That's another good Argentinian player; Calleri.Who is that Cal guy at 1.20? His one hander is amazing..
Extremely impressed after watching this video. How good was he ? Why his career was over so early? In my opinion this guy definitely had enough game to win multiple Slams.
That's another good Argentinian player; Calleri.
He was mentally scarred after one of the biggest chokes ever in the RG final vs Gaudio. Got the yips on his serve and despite a few good tournaments like Rome 05 he circled the drain for a while and dispapperaed.
The yips became a consistent issue after the 2005 clay season. The legendary loss/choke to Gaudio hurt Coria but he still had good reason to believe he had another chance. The arrival of Nadal ruined that completely and sent him into the final mental tailspin that ate his career.
The "only three-year peak" could've been much longer had it not been for the "unfair doping suspension". He was young, when the anti-doping agency beeped him. Perhaps, he could still have played today. Few realize that he's a year younger than Roger Federer.He only had a three-year peak, 2003, 2004, and 2005. He started having issues with his serve and mental issues as well and was never the same. Before that, he had an unfair doping suspension that hindered his progress as well and he had to climb back in the rankings again when he had entered the top 30.
That's another good Argentinian player; Calleri.
Great, great mover and groundstrokes with the variety of an all-courter, only weaknesses being power and the serve. They don't call him the magician for nothing. I will forever be partial to him despite his struggles.
Coria is a worse choker than Federer. At least Federer has 20 slams to his name.Coria must be thankfull for the 40-15 event or he would be considered the greatest choker of all time.
This is the same question I wanted to open a thread about, just the other day.Extremely impressed after watching this video. How good was he ? Why his career was over so early? In my opinion this guy definitely had enough game to win multiple Slams.
I wonder - of Coria had not burned out and continued competing then would Nadal still be considered the "king of clay"? What a great rivalry they would have had!
That is true. But Fed is more famous and that is why his choke will be remembered more.Coria is a worse choker than Federer. At least Federer has 20 slams to his name.
Had some of the heaviest groundstrokes on tour. He was such a fun player to watch as was Coria.
That 62.1% is more indicative of Coria's level in '03. Again very good, but not exactly out of the ordinary vs. top FO contenders past and present.
And '03 was also the only CC season where he averaged over 80% in SGW%. As with Ferrer that lack of firepower makes him vulnerable to big hitters having a field day, let alone actual FO champs. Of course we can't completely rule out a dirtballer of either guy's caliber pulling off a Gaudio, but winning the whole shebang would be very tough for El Mago or Ferru regardless of era.
He was the loser in probably the greatest clay court match of all time against a rising Nadal so pretty good I’d say. Played another pretty good match with Nadal right before that too.
If he hadn’t had those injuries and the yips I feel he’d have been a consistent challenger for the big titles on clay.
Coria is a worse choker than Federer. At least Federer has 20 slams to his name.
I think your definition of “consistent challenger” is a little different from mine.Not even close. Up to '06 Bull was still the proverbial dirtballer who was happy to trade endless groundies and run down everything. That allowed him to play the %s and post that crazy winning streak cuz he was so much better at it than everyone else, but he also had to work harder for it.
Of course the Ls came as he (gradually) upped his aggression, but that was to be expected even on this surface. The fact of the matter is that '08/17 Bull would've made mincemeat of Coria, which can't be said of ATG dirtballers.