How good was Thiem?

lurker2025

Hall of Fame
He was a phenomenal player obviously with an amazing record against the big three but he underperformed at clay masters and curiously won his biggest titles on hard court which was not his best surface in terms of winning percentage. How does he compare to other one slam winners like Cilic, Del Potro, Medvedev and Zverev?
 
He was a phenomenal player obviously with an amazing record against the big three but he underperformed at clay masters and curiously won his biggest titles on hard court which was not his best surface in terms of winning percentage. How does he compare to other one slam winners like Cilic, Del Potro, Medvedev and Zverev?
Thiem was quite good.
 
I'd rate him far worse than Zverev and Mevedev but also slightly worse than Delpo and even Cilic.
I would also rate him below these playes beause he has only 2 big titles (fewer than Tsitsipas) playing in a less competitive era but are Cilic and Delpo really worse than Zverev and Medvedev? Or did they just play in a more competitive era?
 
I would also rate him below these playes beause he has only 2 big titles (fewer than Tsitsipas) playing in a less competitive era but are Cilic and Delpo really worse than Zverev and Medvedev? Or did they just play in a more competitive era?
Zverev has been a top 10 player for 10 years now, far more than the other three.
 
Thiem was challenging the big 3 in majors consistently 2017-2020 time. Zverev was struggling with best of 5 sets matches at the time.
But 2 big titles is very low for someone with Thiem's ceiling? Even Tsitsipas has more and Hurkacz and Rublev have as many.
 
He was yet another one of those talented players to watch out for. Had just enough big wins that made you think he was going to be the next thing. And then it never really happened. Part of the lost generation.
 
Very very good. Should have won an FO, maybe a bit unlucky. But, luck fell his way at the USO, as that should have been Zerev's title.
 
He was yet another one of those talented players to watch out for. Had just enough big wins that made you think he was going to be the next thing. And then it never really happened. Part of the lost generation.
He won a slam and a masters title and was world number 3, he was hardly a failure
 
Title wise, Thiem, Cilic, and Del Potro are all pretty close. I tend to favor consistency, so I would have Zverev and Medvedev above him with their Masters history and WTF titles. I liked Thiem quite a bit though. I was definitely rooting for him to win RG when he made the finals.
 
I agree about Zverev's underachievement. He had an extremely good return and backhand, and nearly-unique lateral movement, which are three of the hardest skills to learn in tennis, near the onset of his career. But his serve took years to mend and his forehand is still largely unfixed. And his strategy/in-match cognition are...well, the less said the better.
 
Err what two big titles?
I would also rate him below these playes beause he has only 2 big titles (fewer than Tsitsipas) playing in a less competitive era but are Cilic and Delpo really worse than Zverev and Medvedev? Or did they just play in a more competitive era?
 
By far the best lost gen player with incredible record against big 3. Explosive off both wings, but underachieved in bo3 format. Yet was the only player capable of beating very decent versions of Djokovic and Nadal. USO 18 and WTF 19 and 20 against the respective players are among the very best I have had pleasure of seeing.
given his incredible ground strokes. I think he would have been capable of upsetting Sinner and Alcaraz from time to time. My guess is he would have won 30% ish of matches against SinnerAz, that is how good he was when he peaked.
He could have become a second Wawrinka, unfortunately for us tennis fans his career ended prematurely by devastating injury.
 
By far the best lost gen player with incredible record against big 3. Explosive off both wings, but underachieved in bo3 format. Yet was the only player capable of beating very decent versions of Djokovic and Nadal. USO 18 and WTF 19 and 20 against the respective players are among the very best I have had pleasure of seeing.
given his incredible ground strokes. I think he would have been capable of upsetting Sinner and Alcaraz from time to time. My guess is he would have won 30% ish of matches against SinnerAz, that is how good he was when he peaked.
He could have become a second Wawrinka, unfortunately for us tennis fans his career ended prematurely by devastating injury.
Thiem was never going to become a second Wawrinka. That ship had sailed after losing AO 2020.
 
Thiem was never going to become a second Wawrinka. That ship had sailed after losing AO 2020.
He was more like a slightly better Ferrer and it is very unlikely he was going to be a second Wawrinka but we will never be fully sure of what he might have accomplished without his injury
 
Proves my point. He d have at least 4 to 5 years. Provided he would be motivated.
Could have actually defended USO 2021 had he recovered from his early 2021 slump instead of catching a wrist injury at Mallorca. Djokovic would have still faced the same CYGS pressure, and Thiem was one of the few people who knew how to play Medvedev ahead of the tour.
 
Back
Top