He's still practically unstoppable. He's the favorite to win each and every tournament he enters regardless of how many times he's lost this year.
He will.
No way are Nadal's chances that high. No way in h*ll.
Who cares if he's favourite when he gets beaten? You're sort of saying he's unstoppable because he's favourite for everything, even if he actually got beaten in everything.
I'm being generous to Djokovic here, Nadal has 7 RG titles, won the last 3 in a row, killed Djokovic in the clay season, and according to Nadal fans only lost a set cos it ws raining. You yourself siad it "got real" for Djokovic in clay season. So really his 2011 clay success over Nadal is a total one off.
So let's recap - Djokovic favourite for everything even if he were to lose 20 matches in a row. Nadal not a chance in hell even when he constantly kills people on clay and there is no sign of this stopping. Incredible reasoning.
Well,why isn't he? Who's going to beat him? I still think you're worried about Fed's slam count,and you should be.
Same people who beat him in 3 out of 4 slams this year?
So what that he only won 1 this year? He was also in 2 other slam finals,and is lock to win the AO for at least the next 3 years,if not more. He will also always be the favorite to win the USO,and also RG.
so? Nadal was in 3 finals in 2011 and made it 4 in a row this year in Australia. But losing in finals meant jack, right? In fact a while ago you were arguing with Veroniquem saying Djokovic had had a terrible 2012 because it was practically the same as Nadal's 2011. So can you make your mind up whether he had a terrible year this yearor whether it was relly good and shows promise for 2013?