How many Slams does 2015 Djokovic win in the presence of 05 Federer, 05 Nadal & 05 Safin?

[fedfan24]

@fedfan24 @Razer

Guys you are unbeleeble , why do you persistently prove that you can only think one-dimensionally. If real tennis worked according to your rules, I believe that tennis history would look much different.

If Federer beats Novak in 2011 or 2012, it is an undoubted proof that Federer05 would destroy him (famous phrase of this forum).

It is clear to the sparrows on the branch that Federer15-19 would beat Nadal05-06 in at least one match, only that is not clear to you. The 30-year-old Novak also defeats Nadal05-06

These are enormously experienced tennis players who have Nadal's complete game in front of their eyes, on a tactical level they would simply destroy him until Nadal05-06 would have no idea what hit him or what they are playing against him.

For you, tennis seems to be just a computer simulation, since you persistently try to present that the experience is nothing and that only ages matters.

Straight up trolling or you haven’t watched 05-07 Nadal play. 4/10 for effort.

 

[Feli18]

No, Nadal had already reigned in '08, he was injured in '09 and was inconsistent. He picked up the reign in '10 and dominated Federer.

If Federer picked up #1, he had it by default, with injury to Nadal. I watched tennis back then, everybody knew Federer had no chance against Nadal. So he was second at 26 and never regained #1, that's no way to treat the supposedly greatest in history!

No chance against Nadal. Lmao. You started watching in 2019.
Peak Federer is 6-8 against Nadal, and he is... 1-6 on Clay, of course.

 

[Feli18]

Straight up trolling or you haven’t watched 05-07 Nadal play. 4/10 for effort.

At this point I reckon Djokovic fans have only watched Djokovic 2019-2023 shredding the pathetic 90s gen. Nothing else.

 

[fedfan24]

No, Nadal had already reigned in '08, he was injured in '09 and was inconsistent. He picked up the reign in '10 and dominated Federer.

If Federer picked up #1, he had it by default, with injury to Nadal. I watched tennis back then, everybody knew Federer had no chance against Nadal. So he was second at 26 and never regained #1, that's no way to treat the supposedly greatest in history!

Federer reached number 1 in 2012, bang in the middle of djokovic peak.

 

[RS]

You know the answer. As long as rain, clouds, and Federer being a far superior player don't get in the way, Roddick's got this in 4.

Nah it's 9-1 or 10-0 Federer

 

[RS]

LOL

At least means he probably thinks it probably more than once even. Maybe even 2-3 times.

 

[Racquet_smash]

Federer 2015-2019 would beat Nadal 2005-2007 on RG at least 1 match.

"Prime" Federer was too arrogant to change his game and adapt it to Nadal, that's why he always lost to him.

The older Federer does not have that handicap of excessive arrogance and has adapted his game to Nadal's weaknesses.

Nadal won all 3 matches against the best versions of Federer while only dropping 3 sets.

How on Earth is Federer with a much worse forehand, worse movement, worse footwork and less confidence beating him?

Not to mention 2015-19 Fed did nothing on clay.