How many slams for Sinner in next 3 years ?

How many slams for Sinner in next 3 years?


  • Total voters
    34

dking68

G.O.A.T.
Djokovic had 6 at age 25.
Djokovic won 1 in 2008, 3 in 2011, 1 in 2012 and 1 in 2013
I think 4-6 for Sinner at age 25
Something like - 2 in 2024, 1/2 in 2025, 2 in 2026
 

dking68

G.O.A.T.
You're selling him short , Djokovic has competition that denied him many slams. Sinner won't have anyone to challenge him.
True. I think Sinner will have more success than young Novak did at Wimbledon, equal/slightly less success at AO, equal success at RG, more success at USO

Yeah 4-6 slams by age 25 for Sinner
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
True. I think Sinner will have more success than young Novak did at Wimbledon, equal/slightly less success at AO, equal success at RG, more success at USO

Yeah 4-6 slams by age 25 for Sinner

I think Sinner will have 10+ slams before he reach 28 and if he gets a weak era post 28 like Djokovic did then he only sky is the limit .
 

tudwell

G.O.A.T.
@tudwell I have Sinner at 5-6 slams at age 25. What do you think?
I’ll guess 3-4 (2-3 more). Could be higher but we’ll see. I don’t think he’s head and shoulders above Novak, Medvedev, or Carlos even on hard courts, and we’ve yet to see how he translates his recent level-up to clay and grass. I think we’re gonna enter a period of relative parity, without any one player dominating for very long.

6 of 12, as OP predicts, would be nuts. I mean it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility, but that’s Big 3-level domination. He only just won his first. A year ago he hadn’t even made a slam semi. He’s on a hit streak but that won’t last forever and then we’ll really see what he’s made of.
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
Some people think Sinner is like one slam wonder Med lol comparing Sinner with such player is like comparing Messi with Harry Kane .
 

dking68

G.O.A.T.
I’ll guess 3-4 (2-3 more). Could be higher but we’ll see. I don’t think he’s head and shoulders above Novak, Medvedev, or Carlos even on hard courts, and we’ve yet to see how he translates his recent level-up to clay and grass. I think we’re gonna enter a period of relative parity, without any one player dominating for very long.

6 of 12, as OP predicts, would be nuts. I mean it’s certainly not beyond the realm of possibility, but that’s Big 3-level domination. He only just won his first. A year ago he hadn’t even made a slam semi. He’s on a hit streak but that won’t last forever and then we’ll really see what he’s made of.
Sinner has won 88% of his matches on hard court in the last 52 weeks

Novak - 87%
Medvedev - 80.4%
Carlos - 76.2%

He’s head and shoulders above Medvedev and Carlos. And he just defeated Novak
 

tudwell

G.O.A.T.
Sinner has won 88% of his matches on hard court in the last 52 weeks

Novak - 87%
Medvedev - 80.4%
Carlos - 76.2%

He’s head and shoulders above Medvedev and Carlos. And he just defeated Novak
He's done better than Med and Carlos over the last year, for sure. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he ends up being the most successful hard courter out of the three. But by head and shoulders I guess I meant something like, I don't know, Novak being 6-1 against Murray at hard court slams. A rarity for the underdog to get the win or really even just to push the victor all that hard (five of those seven matches ended before a fifth set – in Novak's favor).

A head-to-head of, for example, 4-2 isn't exactly what I would call head and shoulders. One player was clearly better, but the margin isn't massive. I could certainly see that for Sinner against Medvedev and Alcaraz, as things stand now. If he completely shuts them out from winning hard court slams over these next three seasons I'll be surprised. Of course he could keep improving and the other two could stagnate long-term or even start declining – anything's possible. But I want to see a larger sample size of Sinner dominating. If he keeps winning 90% of matches against the top five for the next three seasons, then he's not just better than Med and Alcaraz – he's the best tennis player that's ever existed. I think far more likely is he's on a hot streak at the moment and will come back down to earth at some point. Where that floor ends up being once he cools off for a bit is what I'm really curious about.
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
He's done better than Med and Carlos over the last year, for sure. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he ends up being the most successful hard courter out of the three. But by head and shoulders I guess I meant something like, I don't know, Novak being 6-1 against Murray at hard court slams. A rarity for the underdog to get the win or really even just to push the victor all that hard (five of those seven matches ended before a fifth set – in Novak's favor).

A head-to-head of, for example, 4-2 isn't exactly what I would call head and shoulders. One player was clearly better, but the margin isn't massive. I could certainly see that for Sinner against Medvedev and Alcaraz, as things stand now. If he completely shuts them out from winning hard court slams over these next three seasons I'll be surprised. Of course he could keep improving and the other two could stagnate long-term or even start declining – anything's possible. But I want to see a larger sample size of Sinner dominating. If he keeps winning 90% of matches against the top five for the next three seasons, then he's not just better than Med and Alcaraz – he's the best tennis player that's ever existed. I think far more likely is he's on a hot streak at the moment and will come back down to earth at some point. Where that floor ends up being once he cools off for a bit is what I'm really curious about.

Vote !!
 
So, is the WADA thing over? I think he could win 1-2 slams for the next three years, putting him at 3-6 more. I don't think that'll happen if he has to serve any sort of suspension.
 

TheSlicer

Hall of Fame
3 or 4 max, once carlos matures a bit, he can be just as consistent as sinner (remember sinners consistency at alcaraz age? carlos can just do the same until proven otherwise) and once that happens ginger blood will be spilled, hability wise theres no comparison and we all agree on that, even if some lie about it
 

KingCarlitos

Hall of Fame
3 or 4 max, once carlos matures a bit, he can be just as consistent as sinner (remember sinners consistency at alcaraz age? carlos can just do the same until proven otherwise) and once that happens ginger blood will be spilled, hability wise theres no comparison and we all agree on that, even if some lie about it
Already happened, thrice this year actually.
 

Subway Tennis

G.O.A.T.
That was absurd by Sinner. Sinner and Alcaraz are on completely different planes of existence from anyone else on tour at the moment.

Sinner looks like he is on a mission to completely embarrass WADA into insignificance by getting better since they tried to take him down over the clostebol nonsense.
 

Subway Tennis

G.O.A.T.
When and where do you think we will see the first SinnCaraz major final? It can’t be that far away now. These guys are just on a collision course at every event from now on.
 

TheSlicer

Hall of Fame
He's a crazy fanboy who refuses to see the reality, HC slam alone will make Dinner win 6-7 slams and he can also win Wimbledon and RG
lol recency bias is making you deluded, hes not gonna win every hard court slam for 3 seasons you man, not even carlos is gonna win every natural surface slam, get off the clouds, next year hes gonna have to play a different role, lets see how the white blood guy handles it, and of course, you still expect alcaraz to get worse instead of better. remember sinners consistency at 21? we can even argue carlos is gonna be even more consistent, and dont come with the early/late bloomer thing, thats just bs, theres no reasoning whatsoever that proves that being good early means you cant improve in your 20s
 
Top