How many tennis players can run one mile in under 5 minutes 30 seconds?

Matthew Lee

Professional
Wait, are we talking recreational players or professionals or both?

I think 99.99% of pros can do it, but I genuinely have no idea or concept of what the percentage would be for recreational people.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
Tennis is high effort and then low effort. Rest between points, 90 second break on change overs. 5:30 minutes is much longer than how long points last.

A general principle is 'specificity'.

I have a book on nutrition and it discusses the various energy modes of the body. There is a mode for short time effort, up to many seconds and there are other overlapping modes as the duration time increases. ("anaerobic metabolic pathways") Suggest that anyone interested in this subject study those energy systems (and identify the one(s) for 5:30 seconds and the one(s) for short to long tennis points.
Advanced Sports Nutrition, 1st Ed. (2006) Dan Benardot. The book is in its 3rd edition in 2021 and has been enlarged. Highly recommend, especially for discussions of the body's energy systems and their durations.

I was tested on a treadmill for a heart stress test and another time on a pedal machine for VO2 max.

These tests checked out continuous performance for a few minutes. I believe that both tests gradually increased the required effort and I would try to keep doing the increasing levels. I have severe asthma and was not trained for the tests. They could tell from my heart rate and other measurements (including blood oxygen level?) when I was reaching the point where the test would soon end, at some point I was pushing it but could not sustain the push for long. These tests for minutes were not like tennis because they were sustained for longer times and the effort required kept increasing. I guess in a 5:30 minute mile you try to save that last push for just before the finish line.

I would look into those tests and see which of the body's energy modes were failing so that I had to stop for 5:30 minutes vs, say, tens of seconds.

Publication, Kovacs
-------------------------------------------------------------


This graph shows the average time between points in matches including time between points, and some delays, match time/total points. The time of playing a point on average must be a smaller fraction of ~40 seconds. What is the average time playing a point? 10 seconds, more? less?



sec_per_point_2020_cinci.png


On rally length with stats quoted from www.tennisabstract.com

Intensity of tennis match play
J Fernandez, A Mendez‐Villanueva, and B M Pluim
Link -
 
Last edited:

RVT

Rookie
the above study (the last one) makes some suppositions that simply aren't supported in modern literature. ATP resynthesis doesn't occur at the rate that the author(s) suggest. In short, this is perfect active if you're playing a 10 point tiebreak and nothing else..

While the primary component in tennis is anaerobic, there is a still a large aerobic component that should not be ignored--and it would be foolish to limit off-court training to 5-20 second efforts (even if those should be a major focus). And it's worth noting that the aerobic component becomes more important at the end of the match--which typically matters quite a bit...
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
the above study (the last one) makes some suppositions that simply aren't supported in modern literature. ATP resynthesis doesn't occur at the rate that the author(s) suggest. In short, this is perfect active if you're playing a 10 point tiebreak and nothing else..

While the primary component in tennis is anaerobic, there is a still a large aerobic component that should not be ignored--and it would be foolish to limit off-court training to 5-20 second efforts (even if those should be a major focus). And it's worth noting that the aerobic component becomes more important at the end of the match--which typically matters quite a bit...

I assumed that the premise of the OP was that running for 5 minutes & 30 seconds was a plus for tennis conditioning.

I looked up some data that indicated the percentage of the time that the players were exerting themselves. The percentage looks low on average and the times for points are much less than 5:30 minutes.

Is running a mile a plus for tennis conditioning? Why?

For myself, when I played singles, I discovered that I ran out of energy in the second set because of how I ate before & during the match. Fixed that.
 
Last edited:

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
I think tennis coaches asked their players to do long distance runs more than 20-30 years ago. Now that the mix of anaerobic vs aerobic exertion is better understood, the focus is much more on short-distance sprint and interval training to develop speed more than endurance especially with in-season training. Players might work on their endurance and cardiovascular capacity more during the off-season, but practicing 4-5 hours on-court daily automatically builds up endurance also apart from any gym work that they do.
 

Bambooman

Legend
The idea is that if you can sustain endurance performance in a continuous manner it is easier to then transfer it to shorter bursts repeated for hours. Plus you can then do more training of repeated sprints etc.
The more mileage a runner does, the more interval volume they also tend to do. Because they can.
 

RVT

Rookie
I assumed that the premise of the OP was that running for 5 minutes & 30 seconds was a plus for tennis conditioning.

I looked up some data that indicated the percentage of the time that the players were exerting themselves. The percentage looks low on average and the times for points are much less than 5:30 minutes.

Is running a mile a plus for tennis conditioning? Why?

For myself, when I played singles, I discovered that I ran out of energy in the second set because of how I ate before & during the match. Fixed that.
I thought it was more of a question of "it a mile time a good proxy for tennis fitness". Honestly, It's a pretty good one. A 5:30 mile will be approximately 40/60 anaerobic/aerobic, and if you look at the overall energy demands of tennis over 3 sets, the breakdown is probably similar.

The principle of specificity is a real thing; so is the principle of overload--which is why some endurance training makes sense. I wouldn't recommend going regular all out miles though, just due to the injury factor.

The higher intensity, the longer the recovery period and less overall work one can handle. It's a tricky balance, since all athletes have limited resources. Time you're training is time you aren't recovering.
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
I thought it was more of a question of "it a mile time a good proxy for tennis fitness". Honestly, It's a pretty good one. A 5:30 mile will be approximately 40/60 anaerobic/aerobic, and if you look at the overall energy demands of tennis over 3 sets, the breakdown is probably similar.

The principle of specificity is a real thing; so is the principle of overload--which is why some endurance training makes sense. I wouldn't recommend going regular all out miles though, just due to the injury factor.

The higher intensity, the longer the recovery period and less overall work one can handle. It's a tricky balance, since all athletes have limited resources. Time you're training is time you aren't recovering.

If a poster has a publication bearing on the rationale for 1 mile runs for tennis, that is what we need. That would seem to have been researched and exist. ?

Figuring it out on the forum.................

I read on the subject of periodization a few years ago and it seemed to be advanced, too complicated for first thought forum analysis. Better to search the internet.

Periodization lends itself to an off time and then a seasonal time. It is difficult for tennis pros or rec players because tennis is played so much of the year. Curves like this probably exist for pros and seasonal college tennis.

Long runs - while pros are playing tennis 10 months a year - seems very risky if they get a ding in the knee. ? What do they do?


traditional-periodization-model2.jpg
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
I was once on an exercise machine at the gym and overheard two serious tennis players, in 30's?, talking about their competitive tennis together with strength training at the gym. They said it was rough to do both at the same time because of various pains. ? One guy had quit tennis because he could not do both.
 
Last edited:

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
I was once on an exercise machine at the gym and overheard two serious tennis players talking about their competitive tennis together with strength training at the gym. They said it was rough for doing both because of various pains. ? One guy had quit tennis because he could not do both.
Met that guy,
1200x0.jpg
 

RVT

Rookie

See that little guy lifting weights? This is really where periodization works best.... Having spent the last 25+ years racing bikes and the last 15+ coaching cyclists, I can tell you that this is one of the most mis-used concepts out there. I mean, if you're one of 3 or 4 guys in the world targeting a Grand Tour, it makes some sense. For everyone else, including 99% of professional riders, you're expected to be good from late February though October. Your contract requires it. You can have some "mini-peaks" around key events, but the traditional Bompa periodization scheme is simply not relevant to athletes who compete year-round. Tennis players certainly fall into this category (with the exception of a couple of guys and gals, who CAN just focus on a few key events).

While it's an N=1 thing, Wozniacki demonstrated that a top 10 tennis player can handle quite a bit of run load. I think she was running ~50 mpw while in the top 10--and I think it coincided with when she was playing her best tennis. I don't know how much the average tennis player runs these days. When I was in college, it was typical to do 3-4 30 minute runs a week, at a ~7:30 pace, so a high-tempo pace but not all out.

I don't actually think tennis alone is going to be that effective for aerobic training. There's not enough overload to elicit a response. That's why I think some supplemental training makes sense. As far as what that looks like, I think "it depends". If you're a player who can stay sharp by doing 1.5-2.5 hours a day training on the court, I'd probably run. If I were a player who was in the 3-5 hours a day on-court category, then I'd look at something lower-impact, like the bike.

For a rec player (including serious rec players), If I were on court fewer than 12 hours a week, I'd absolutely be supplementing with something--probably 2-3 runs of 20-30 minutes at 85% intensity. If I were a competitive rec player really going to maximize performance and balance it with real life commitments, I'd probably run 2 days a week, 30-40 minutes, and do two two days of high intensity, either on the bike or running lines, focusing on efforts in the 10-30 second range.
 

Bambooman

Legend
7:30 pace is high tempo? That's a low bar for an athlete.

Sebastian Korda mentioned his more old school training and said he did up to 15 miles in a run. Not bad.
 

RVT

Rookie
7:30 pace is high tempo? That's a low bar for an athlete.

Sebastian Korda mentioned his more old school training and said he did up to 15 miles in a run. Not bad.
No, it's not... That's roughly the tempo pace for someone running a 3:15 marathon. That approximates to a vo2 max in the 60 ml/kg/min range (approximately, depending on running economy). That's right in the range of the average vo2 for an elite male tennis player.
 

RVT

Rookie
deja vu thread


Still, the science moves along................

Having spend the last 25+ years immersed in exercise science, I have to say I'm not sure that is much new actionable information out there with respect to training the alactic, anaerobic and aerobic energy systems. People talk about "HIIT" like it's some new thing--never mind that Billat and Tabata's most influence work is 20-25 years old at this point...

The energy demands of tennis are pretty well-understood. So are the methods to improve fitness. Yet some seem intent on searching out individual studies that are (barely) tangentially related to explain why they shouldn't do workouts which they simply don't want to do. It's not complicated: if you want to maximize your potential, you have to do some off-court training
 

Demented

Semi-Pro
I play this guy once every other week, he's 70 years old and as of 2 years ago he could complete the Army PT qualifications of 2 miles in under 11 minutes, I think he said he was close to 10:10. He shattered his foot falling off a ladder and then retired because he couldn't do the PT anymore.
 

RVT

Rookie
I play this guy once every other week, he's 70 years old and as of 2 years ago he could complete the Army PT qualifications of 2 miles in under 11 minutes, I think he said he was close to 10:10. He shattered his foot falling off a ladder and then retired because he couldn't do the PT anymore.

You mean 10:10 for each mile, not for 2 miles, correct? Because no one that age is running 2 miles in that time.
 

Demented

Semi-Pro
no, 10:10 for both miles. He had to meet the PT quals to stay in the army. He was still running marathons and iron mans as well... The first time I played him, I thought he was in his 50's... He's like 5'8 maybe 140 lbs.. and was willing to grind out every point for hours..
 
Last edited:

RVT

Rookie
no, 10:10 for both miles. He had to meet the PT quals to stay in the army. He was still running marathons and iron mans as well...

Yeah, sorry--that's not possible.


World record time for 70+ was broken not that long ago. 5:29 for a stand-alone indoor mile. A 68 year old is not running 2 miles at 10:10, or anywhere close to it.

I don't think people understand that a 5:30 mile is actually really fast.
 

RVT

Rookie
additionally, the army requirements are no where close to these times? I mean, unless he's in the Kenyan army??!


If running 2 miles under 11:00 were required to be in the Army, we'd be in big trouble, because I'd bet there are fewer than 1,000 people in the army who could manage that time. And that's being generous.
 

Demented

Semi-Pro
I think it was part of the particular area he was in that had 'enhanced' requirements. I've personally seen him run in 4.0-4.5 singles matches for 2+ hours in the 90 degree Louisiana heat and humidity. He's not even breathing hard.
 

bobleenov1963

Hall of Fame
I play this guy once every other week, he's 70 years old and as of 2 years ago he could complete the Army PT qualifications of 2 miles in under 11 minutes, I think he said he was close to 10:10. He shattered his foot falling off a ladder and then retired because he couldn't do the PT anymore.

complete B.S.
 

SteveI

Legend
I would just love to be able to run 1 mile without pain from my knees and lower back. I can fast walk 1 mile in about 15 mins...:)
 
Last edited:

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
I would just love to be able to run 1 mile without pain from my knees and lower back. I can fast 1 mile in about 15 mins...:)
Bro-in-law still plays full court basketball at 59. Guys ask how. He states he has always worked out in a pool.
 

mental midget

Hall of Fame
guessing like 98% of the tour could run 5:30, no problem. that's like a mediocre high school track freshman time, even at that age the good kids are going under 5. if you're on tour, you're a strong, fast athlete. there are tiers of course but even, say, a dan evans would most likely be able to bang that time out. sub 5 starts to get more interesting
 

RVT

Rookie
guessing like 98% of the tour could run 5:30, no problem. that's like a mediocre high school track freshman time, even at that age the good kids are going under 5. if you're on tour, you're a strong, fast athlete. there are tiers of course but even, say, a dan evans would most likely be able to bang that time out. sub 5 starts to get more interesting
You're comparing apples and garden hoses...

A mile runner is purely focused on aerobic output and running economy. A tennis player has to have a high level an anaerobic power and relays a lot more on fast twitch muscle fibers. Tennis players are also a lot heavier.

Ballpark vo2 required to run a 5:30 mile is ~54 l/ml/kg. The average vo2 male pro tennis players is about 56 l/ml/kg. So it would be really unusual if "almost all" could run a mile in 5:30? Probably more like 50-70%. And vo2max typically drops with older players.

Yeah, 5:30 is not a great time for a mile runner. Tennis players are note milers....
 

mental midget

Hall of Fame
You're comparing apples and garden hoses...

A mile runner is purely focused on aerobic output and running economy. A tennis player has to have a high level an anaerobic power and relays a lot more on fast twitch muscle fibers. Tennis players are also a lot heavier.

Ballpark vo2 required to run a 5:30 mile is ~54 l/ml/kg. The average vo2 male pro tennis players is about 56 l/ml/kg. So it would be really unusual if "almost all" could run a mile in 5:30? Probably more like 50-70%. And vo2max typically drops with older players.

Yeah, 5:30 is not a great time for a mile runner. Tennis players are note milers....

i'm assuming most pros do at least a decent amount of mild distance training for aerobic fitness as well. i could be wrong there but anecdotally i remember reading safin (of all people) did 35 minute 5 mile runs as part of his training. i'm assuming given that he could have toughed out one 530 or better mile...again, i could be wrong. your 50-70% figure could be closer–but in a do or die situation i'm guessing more of them could, than couldn't.
 

Ronaldo

Bionic Poster
You're comparing apples and garden hoses...

A mile runner is purely focused on aerobic output and running economy. A tennis player has to have a high level an anaerobic power and relays a lot more on fast twitch muscle fibers. Tennis players are also a lot heavier.

Ballpark vo2 required to run a 5:30 mile is ~54 l/ml/kg. The average vo2 male pro tennis players is about 56 l/ml/kg. So it would be really unusual if "almost all" could run a mile in 5:30? Probably more like 50-70%. And vo2max typically drops with older players.

Yeah, 5:30 is not a great time for a mile runner. Tennis players are note milers....
.
 

onehandbh

G.O.A.T.
For someone that doesn't run at all, what is a safe way to slowly ramp up to running 1 mile and increasing my speed?

I only run on a tennis court, but tennis doesn't have that much sustained running.
 

tennis3

Hall of Fame
Go out and jog a mile. When it gets easier, go faster.
I read your posts in the thread. You are obviously a long time runner as you say. Only a runner would answer this question like this. Everyone else would quote some nonsense they read somewhere that sounds smart.
 
Top