# How much weight equals how much balance change?

Discussion in 'Racquets' started by wolfpackfive, Mar 10, 2005.

1. ### wolfpackfiveNew User

Joined:
Feb 13, 2005
Messages:
44
In general, how much weight at 3 and 9 o'clock equals how large a balance change. For instance, would 3 grams at 3 and 3 grams at 9 (6 total) make a 6 points head light racquet even balanced? Probably not so simple and depends on the overall starting static weight as well as its distribution throughout the racquet, huh?

2. ### Steve H.Semi-Pro

Joined:
Feb 25, 2004
Messages:
756
Here's the formula for shift in balance point

shift = d*m/(m+M)

where M = mass of the frame (g)
m = mass of the weight added (g)
and d = distance from the balance point you add the weight

hope this helps

3. ### gregravenSemi-Pro

Joined:
Apr 22, 2004
Messages:
617
Uhh, Steve H., he asked for an answer in general, not in specific.

4. ### tedmeisterRookie

Joined:
Jan 7, 2005
Messages:
330
Location:
Where I am at
In General, the lighter the frame, the less weight it will take to move that balance point. In Private...that will take some time, a lot of math and a calculator among other things :mrgreen: Better to just visit our shop for a free consultation.

5. ### Steve H.Semi-Pro

Joined:
Feb 25, 2004
Messages:
756
That formula _is_ the general answer, guys, and it's not rocket science. By all means go to a shop if you want, but you can learn more just fiddling with your own frames.

You can approximate without a calculator: let's say the racquet is 300 grams and 6 points (2 cm) head-light. You add 6 grams about 20 cm from the balance point

so the balance shift will be 20*6 / 300+6 = 120/306 = about 0.4 cm
(a point or two, still nowhere near even balance)

In general, if you want to alter the balance of your racquet adding tape to the hoop isn't a great way to do it because it will make a much bigger difference to swingweight than to balance. Adding or removing weight at the handle, however, will have an equal effect on balance but won't change swingweight much because the handle is at the axis of rotation.

6. ### rich sHall of Fame

Joined:
Feb 18, 2004
Messages:
2,528
Location:
ATL
Steve- I'm with you!

You can't get much more general than that.

7. ### Kaptain KarlHall Of Fame

Joined:
Sep 17, 2004
Messages:
5,235
Location:
Steve - Thanks! I've "suspected" there was a formula to gauge what weightings would do. Knowing this, I may even try tweaking my frames this Spring.

- KK

8. ### tedmeisterRookie

Joined:
Jan 7, 2005
Messages:
330
Location:
Where I am at
There are some folks out there where you really have to whip out the tools of the trade such as the balance board and scale before they will be satisfied. They want the numbers to look right before they start having confidence in the stick. I've used the racquet customizer tool for my own racquets before, the numbers looked right but it somehow doesn't feel right. I still had to do some minor adjustments to get it to go through the air like I wanted.

If one takes a closer look at Steve's formula. the smaller the mass of the frame which is the denominator in this formula, the larger the shift in balance will be which was my point in my first post. This quantifies what we know for a fact from experience that it is so much easier to customize a lighter frame than a heavier one. I was half kidding when I mentioned that we'll be needing a calculator to compute this :grin: