Tennishacker
Professional
TCF, are you saying Kudla, Smyczek, Johnson, Ebden, Klahn, Sock all have no chance of top 50-75...
Every year a player stays in the futures/challengers, the less likely they will break into the tour...
TCF, are you saying Kudla, Smyczek, Johnson, Ebden, Klahn, Sock all have no chance of top 50-75...
Every year a player stays in the futures/challengers, the less likely they will break into the tour...
Please detail what the " front door" is for the board here to understand , as I know the way to the top of this sport is through the future " gathering points" ,then the Challengers and on to the 250 , 500,1000 , unless you win the Zoo you are going through the futures !!!
So please explain how your daughter is going through your imaginary front door?
You mentioned 6 guys, perhaps one of them will pull off an extended stay (lets say that means 7-8 years) in the top 50.
Example of the front door to the ATP.....sixteen-year-old Christian Garin of Chile won his first match at the ATP main draw level today.
Most of the players that make it show substantial rankings rises year after year. Almost no top 80 pros spent year after year at the futures level.
By the way BB, I think I have been quite clear lately. I am only interested in the ideas of those tennis coaches/parents whose kids have legitimate shots at going straight to the pros at a precocious age, and not coaches of those whose plan entails year after year of banging it out in low level tournaments trying to scrounge for pro points.
By the way BB, I think I have been quite clear lately. I am only interested in the ideas of those tennis coaches/parents whose kids have legitimate shots at going straight to the pros at a precocious age, and not coaches of those whose plan entails year after year of banging it out in low level tournaments trying to scrounge for pro points.
So with all due respect, not much we can converse about as we have opposite ideas of what a true plan to develop a great player entails.
Brad, I just have to agree with TCF here. His plan of having his 8 year old win the OB at 12 and then move straight into the top 100 ATP seems like a winner. I don’t know why you insist on playing futures with your 16 year old boy who is #13 in USTA 18’s. You are a real pretender
HERE is reality
We hit with 2 guys that won the OB and EH back to back in the 12's they are both attending college and would be awful lucky to take a set off DB now, they have trouble trying to keep up with him in practice now, winning it at 16 and 18 means nothing also just says your a solid player .
.
Yeah, but some guys need that time, taken Anderson a while to be solidly in the top 50, and other players needed time to reach that level, Janowicz, Soeda. I guess I'm trying to say, front door, side door, back door, if one of them gets you to the show, you are still in the show. Good quote from Raonic coach, "I don't think you can find many players under 22 or 21 that are even top 100 (in the rankings)," Blanco said. "What he's doing is pretty impressive."
Actually, looking at Milos travels he played all over the place in Futures( side note, he lost quite a bit to Mr. Fugate amazing), would Milos be considered a front door or back door?
By the way BB, I think I have been quite clear lately. I am only interested in the ideas of those tennis coaches/parents whose kids have legitimate shots at going straight to the pros at a precocious age, and not coaches of those whose plan entails year after year of banging it out in low level tournaments trying to scrounge for pro points.
So with all due respect, not much we can converse about as we have opposite ideas of what a true plan to develop a great player entails.
TCF has a very high performance standard for a good coach. But his insights for boys having a dream of playing professional tennis may be right, namely a great player needs to be able to break into "big league" in a few short years playing minor league. A boy may need to break into top 300 by 18. If not, it's time for Plan B, do what Anderson did, namely, pick up a top D1 college to continue to develop your game, your mental and physicality. If you are an All-American and have good results in Futures in the summer, you keep your pro dream alive... Anytime, you break into top 300, you quit school and test your improved games in Challenges. Give yourself another 2 years to break into top 100 by qualifying and winning matches at ATP and a couple of Challenges. If you could not do so, finish your school, become a teaching pro or spend a few years to get your MD or MBA.
Agree Chemist, but I think as players get bigger, stronger, the days of a 16-18 boy coming out and handling top 150 players on a regular basis are or have passed. Also, the plan you are stating is the one that TCF now does not want to discuss, and as players get bigger, stronger they need the extra years to get their game in sync with their bodies. Girls a whole other story.
After a few ITF the one thing I saw compared to most of our young players is the way they approach fitness , a lot of the Jrs from other countrys were already weight training at a solid level ,our boys have know idea of what that is here in the USA , I was down in Fl. and saw that at 18 and 19 they were just starting to get serious about their fitness at Boca ,
There were 8 guys there, I talked with 2 of them and they explained what they were now doing and its kinda to late to be working on building that at this point breaking your body down on a serious level and then trying to play events ? good luck !
Anyone seeing Nadal come on the scene at 18 ripped and thinking he was born that way I will get my real estate licence and work part time in Fl. and I will give you a ripping deal on a lot of that wet land stuff .
HERE is reality
As soon as TCF's daughter who hits like Serena can figure out how to get a jr win in the 10's its gonna be pretty cool . ….
btw way you must not understand the process , you can win the OB … lil girl but she needs to figure out how to win a match 1st .
Brad, you continue to believe that just because your kid has always been one of the top 5 boys in his class you somehow know more about the process and the “reality” than TCF. TCF has spent long hours thinking about what he will do to enable his 8 year old too far surpass your feeble efforts. By skipping futures, challenges, and going straight to the ATP at an early age he will have an ATP top 100 player, probably by the time she is 18.
Yep, however some are blessed a la Lebron, Nadal, they were men among boys, with good genes and hard work. Take DB, he can do his physical training now and get stronger and fitter, but he still won't be his strongest physically til early to mid 20's, but great that his building a strong foundation before he gets there, unlike these other kids.
If TCF has a daughter, how is she going to be in the ATP?
No I meant literally. Never mind. I found multiple posts about how he wants her to be on the ATP, and I was confused. I guess it was meant to be WTA.
your talking TCF why are you confused haha
The posts were by others
Both TCF and #1 seem to be really good tennis coaches. Both have unique ways of training their kids to be professional tennis players. Debating who is a better coach would just go nowhere - the tennis community seems to be widely divided... So, I propose that we stop predicting which kid shall fail, stop making fun at each other for now. Let's start a real race between #1 and TCF. The winner shall be determined by their kids, yes, by how well they would do in professional tennis (no, Jr results won't count). How about comparing their highest ATP/WTA ranking? It may take 10-15 years to see the outcome of the race that would crown the title of #1 parent-coach in USA! Well, if another American kid is doing better as a pro and is coached by their parents, then the title would be changed to the 2nd, 3rd... best parent-coach in USA. In any case, we shall know who is a better coach, TCF or #1?
We will be cheering for the race and rooting for both kids.
Crap, ten more years of TCF vs. #1 this board will meltdown by then. Just kidding, it is always interesting to see how it all plays out, we have seen parents of the next greatest player come and go on here and elsewhere on the web. You have to love the passion and intensity of both and don't forget GA tennis, he is also in the race with these two.
Great posts and a lot of fun reading. Chemist, you seem to have a good handle on the subject after reading your last few comments. The unique thing about tennis is that it is totally up to you as a player. If you win matches/tournaments you will move up the rankings at all levels. There is no front door or back door in play here. All the wildcards in the world will only give you opportunity, but if you can't win or are not able to play at that level it is a mute point. Professional tennis is tough to break into due to the points system and the fact that you must defeat an opponent on the other side of the net. Usually they are just as good as you. Win matches and everything else will take care of itself.
100% agree! The top professional tennis players are not only highly talented, they are machines - their fitness level and their mental toughness are simply beyond what an average tennis player can imagine! I start to think that over a thousand minor league players spent year after year in Futures, some of them may not really be chasing their dream of winning a grand slam, they are doing this because of their love for the game of tennis; they enjoy the competition at the highest level! My hat off to those who are still doing this at age of 30 or even older!
I have been saying that for years , my friend new the Williams when they were young he said their dad had them running lots of sprints when they were young 8 ,9 10 yrs of age , him and his buddys shooting baskets would think this old man is tourturing these little girls "all the years later " look what he built!
But there are some who think its some special talent or genes . Same with Federer, he was in Dubai a few years back putting in 6 to 8 hr days kinda ridiculous for someone so talented.
Brad - the clock is ticking - you must have some milestones or benchmarks for DB at this point - a futures event win by 18 - a challenger win by 19 - can you share your thoughts on this at this point - At some point you need to stop talking about development and start focusing on results - are we close to that point -
Right now its a matter of getting into as many futures as possible getting used to them over the next few months then dominating and moving on , that simple and we will .
#1 Coach. You are going down the right path. Don't expect him to start dominating Futures in 6 months. Men are breaking into the top 100 for the first time at a later age than 10 years ago. There are many cracking the ATP top 100 for he first time age 25 or later.
Ya I forgot about GA's two kids. Will be fun to watch GA's daughter battling TCF's daughter. GA's 7 yr old son, though 9 yrs younger, may have a chance of playing #1's son in an ATP match 10-12 years from now.
Having a feeling that GA doesn't care or care a lot less about being named the best parent-coach
#1 Coach. You are going down the right path. Don't expect him to start dominating Futures in 6 months. Men are breaking into the top 100 for the first time at a later age than 10 years ago. There are many cracking the ATP top 100 for he first time age 25 or later.
There you go again. Planning to work your way up through the ranks. Where has that gotten you so far? Sure, you have been top five in your class and are ready to start playing futures at 16 but look at TCF. He has the right plan. His girl will skip all this working up and go straight to the big time. You should listen to him.