How serious are we ??

chalkflewup

Hall of Fame
Very true. But are we following the players close enough to make predictions anyway?

For example, Tomic was posting results as a 15-16 year old, as was Nadal. So many would have predicted they would make money in tennis. But I do not pay enough attention to the ITFs and Euro tournaments to pull other guys out.

Its also possible to reverse engineer it. Pull the 20 youngest top 100 players out and see if they had success at age 15-16.

You mention exceptions not the rule?

Was Isner? Was Todd Martin?
 

chalkflewup

Hall of Fame
Tell me the name of a 14, 15 or 16 yr. old with no ATP rank or a very low one that will make it? Then let's track it.That will be impressive. Other than knowing the pitfalls of trying to play any professional sport when on emarks on that path, I see very little value in tooting that horn.

Saying (insert players name) won't make a living on the pro tour is like saying you won't win the lottery.

Exactly! That's why this discussion is ridiculous.
 

playsmart

New User
Tell me the name of a 14, 15 or 16 yr. old with no ATP rank or a very low one that will make it? Then let's track it.That will be impressive. Other than knowing the pitfalls of trying to play any professional sport when on emarks on that path, I see very little value in tooting that horn.

Saying (insert players name) won't make a living on the pro tour is like saying you won't win the lottery.

Well, comparing two statements:
1/ Saying (insert players name) won't make a living on the pro tour is like saying he won't win the lottery

2/Saying (insert players name) will make a living on the pro tour is like saying he will win the lottery

Still #2 looks more likely to me.
 
One factor we are leaving out in development is coaching. Hard to believe that someone who never played, never picked up a racquet, had no interest in the sport until 12 years ago, is equal to coaching32yrs- who has spent thousands of hours on the court competing and is regarded by his peers as a classic tennis overachiever- great tennis mind woefully short on talent. Somehow the guy who never played understands tennis better? Makes no sense. There are levels, as in playing. Coaching 32 vs Jeff Salzenstein who played years on the pro tour, great thinker- he's light years ahead of coach32. Gilbert is ahead of Salzenstein. Yet a player whose coach never played, never picked up a racquet is fully developed? Explain.
 
One factor we are leaving out in development is coaching. Hard to believe that someone who never played, never picked up a racquet, had no interest in the sport until 12 years ago, is equal to coaching32yrs- who has spent thousands of hours on the court competing and is regarded by his peers as a classic tennis overachiever- great tennis mind woefully short on talent. Somehow the guy who never played understands tennis better? Makes no sense. There are levels, as in playing. Coaching 32 vs Jeff Salzenstein who played years on the pro tour, great thinker- he's light years ahead of coach32. Gilbert is ahead of Salzenstein. Yet a player whose coach never played, never picked up a racquet is fully developed? Explain.

makes no sense to you makes complete sense to me , just because you never played does not mean you cant master it and know it better then a lot of guys that have been teaching it 20 or 30 years , to me tennis is very simple to teach , half of what I really believe about how to build a player I never share with people and what I know is best I only work on in private with my player .

Let everyone do there own homework but I agree coaching is a huge part and thats why I take credit for what my player has done !
 

Misterbill

Semi-Pro
Let everyone do there own homework but I agree coaching is a huge part and thats why I take credit for what my player has done !

Things like credit and respect can't be taken or claimed. They are earned.

In most cases I have seen, those who try to take credit or claim respect end up losing more of it than they gain. I think we are seeing a real life example of that right here.

Why don't you just give your player all the credit and let it go at that. Isn't his success enough reward for you. Or do you really need to read posts you have written on a message board calling yourself the greatest coach to get full satisfaction from your boy's tennis
 
Not sure Coach. Uncle Toni drive Rafa like a maniac. Made Coach #1 look like tinkerbell. Rafa's parents wanted to stop it a few times. It's in Rafa's book. Also, I saw Rafa at age 17 with those bulging biceps. Would Rafa's talent blossomed with you or I? We are *****cats compared to Uncle Toni.
 

chalkflewup

Hall of Fame
Not sure Coach. Uncle Toni drive Rafa like a maniac. Made Coach #1 look like tinkerbell. Rafa's parents wanted to stop it a few times. It's in Rafa's book. Also, I saw Rafa at age 17 with those bulging biceps. Would Rafa's talent blossomed with you or I? We are *****cats compared to Uncle Toni.

Joe Montana's peewee football coach won all those super bowls for Joe. And Uncle Toni hit every winner that earned Rafa a birth to the las petite finals vs gasquet as a young teen. Coaches play a part but please, kids win matches.
 
Things like credit and respect can't be taken or claimed. They are earned.

In most cases I have seen, those who try to take credit or claim respect end up losing more of it than they gain. I think we are seeing a real life example of that right here.

Why don't you just give your player all the credit and let it go at that. Isn't his success enough reward for you. Or do you really need to read posts you have written on a message board calling yourself the greatest coach to get full satisfaction from your boy's tennis

Maybe in your world ! In mine "reality" when people asked who built his forehand I say I did , I studied video ,I showed it to him ,he followed my instructions he has a nice forehand who gets credit me , when he goes out and win a match he gets credit he did the work out there , funny when he won Bornas coach came up shook my hand and said coach "you" did a great job with him then he went on and shook DB's hand and said great win , great fight !

so do I take credit sure why not ?

I don't call myself the greatest coach its Number1coach to you !
 

Misterbill

Semi-Pro
Maybe in your world ! In mine "reality" when people asked who built his forehand I say I did , I studied video ,I showed it to him ,he followed my instructions he has a nice forehand who gets credit me , when he goes out and win a match he gets credit he did the work out there , funny when he won Bornas coach came up shook my hand and said coach "you" did a great job with him then he went on and shook DB's hand and said great win , great fight !

so do I take credit sure why not ?

I don't call myself the greatest coach its Number1coach to you !

I get it. This is about you.
 

Chemist

Rookie
so do I take credit sure why not ?

I will ask my son to give me more credit for his tennis development. He only gave me 1% credit after he won four 3-setters in 2 days:cry:

Honestly, parents or parent-coaches can play more important role in our kids development than their coach, because we care more and we know more than any coach how our kids win, how they lose, what needs to be improved...
 

WoodIndoors

New User
Maybe in your world ! In mine "reality" when people asked who built his forehand I say I did , I studied video ,I showed it to him ,he followed my instructions he has a nice forehand who gets credit me , when he goes out and win a match he gets credit he did the work out there , funny when he won Bornas coach came up shook my hand and said coach "you" did a great job with him then he went on and shook DB's hand and said great win , great fight !

so do I take gredit sure why not?

Basically what you say is true. You can mold a forehand, to an extent.

But can we say that Toni Nadal made Rafa?

Toni would propably answer 'yes', Rafa 'no' (depending who's asking) - who's more right?

(Rafa gives gredit to Toni, sure, and says without him impossible, and that's correct but that doesn't justify Toni's answer)

In a way I see this a cultural thing. Mr B thinks like japanese here
 

ClarkC

Hall of Fame
You need to forget about the past. His success or failure in futures and challengers is all that matters now.

Not sure that Futures are the next level. In a month, he turns 17 and ages up into the 18s. No more claims of "playing two age divisions up" at that point. He has two years in the 18s before aging out. Can he win a super-national USTA event in the 18s, or a comparable non-USTA (ITF) event? That would be a great indicator.

On the theory that you dominate at one level, then move on to the next level, has DB dominated at the 18s level?
 

Chemist

Rookie
On the topic of picking out guys at 15-17 with bright futures and possibly making money some day:

Seventeen-year-old Yoshihito Nishioka of Japan. Won the $15,000 Futures in Mexico last week without dropping a set in any of his eight wins. Reached the finals of other futures after just turning 16. Semis in a Jr. Slam at age 16.

He seems to be able to do well only in Mexico. How about the 16 yr old Aussie kid who played Fed Cup for US and reached the final of Jr AO?
 
Not sure that Futures are the next level. In a month, he turns 17 and ages up into the 18s. No more claims of "playing two age divisions up" at that point. He has two years in the 18s before aging out. Can he win a super-national USTA event in the 18s, or a comparable non-USTA (ITF) event? That would be a great indicator.

On the theory that you dominate at one level, then move on to the next level, has DB dominated at the 18s level?

good question and from my view yes and no we only spend enough time to take care of the commitments to the sponsors ranking means product and then he reach as high as I believe 3 in the nation but once again we have never been in the jrs to dominate in the sense of playing jr event we know we will final in over and over ,

here in So. Cal he won plenty of finals in his respected age group , as for the 18's and our development we were more interested in seeing how he sized up ,strengths , weaknesses, looking for things we needed to work on for the next level . His semis at Clays and Winters round of 16 at the Zoo then quarters at the OB tells me enough at the age of 16 and had we attacked the age bracket with all we had he would dominate and be no. 1 , but that would show we were not after the right things we need to be.
 
Yes, the Aussie kid is also one to watch.

By the way, the Japanese kid also got to the semis of the US Open jrs. Kid knows how to win.

Db played him a lot at IMG , DB won all three sets they played and beat him in most of there baseline games 3 out of 5 format to 11 , he is very quick though and his defense is solid .
 
BB....to answer Clark's question, I do not think you guys are going for Zoos and 18s are you? I thought it was now the futures like the international guys we are talking about.

Looking at the OB field these days it looks like the top ITF boys are going the futures route anyway.

yes we will play the Zoo to attempt to win the wildcard , why wouldn't you ?

You should know by now I don't follow the international guys as a lead , we have seen them up close and the only thing we have in common is the goal .
 
Last edited:

ga tennis

Hall of Fame
I enjoy it. Its great to hear different peoples ideas on player development. TCF makes alot of good points and so does Brad.
 

andfor

Legend
I think we have talked about this BB.....people get on me when I mention success in practice settings vs older girls, and now I realize they are right.

None of it matters. All that matters is what players do in structured matches. This Japanese kid is winning....futures, semis in futures, semis in jr. slams.

Totally irrelevant what he does in a practice setting. Tennis is full of stories about how this player or that did great vs some known player in a practice setting.

The only thing that matters is which player wins when they start playing for real, in a tournament with a prize.

What's funny is when he does have results you belittle them.
 
I think we have talked about this BB.....people get on me when I mention success in practice settings vs older girls, and now I realize they are right.

None of it matters. All that matters is what players do in structured matches. This Japanese kid is winning....futures, semis in futures, semis in jr. slams.

Totally irrelevant what he does in a practice setting. Tennis is full of stories about how this player or that did great vs some known player in a practice setting.

The only thing that matters is which player wins when they start playing for real, in a tournament with a prize.

I agree with you , you need to win in tourneys but you have 2 guys who can do that DB and Yoshi but my point is that the futures are a little deceptive they are pro events but most of the level is like a Nat 2 and you will have a couple of guys that are solid ,, the one in TJ,Mex from what I was told was a weak field , I haven't check that yet , if so that would explains why a guy like Yoshi could blow right through it .
At the next level he will run into guys like DB "size" and who are a little more mature and there is where the roadblocks will pop up .

Once you get closer to this level "age"with your girl you will see this more clearly right now you just look at the stats which are a good measurement but not the end all .
 

andfor

Legend
andfor....speaking of a broken record, we have been through this. I have said a bunch of times, DBs results are great. I congratulated them over and over. He can go to many colleges now.

But its all relative. BB says no college, the pros, he knows how to raise a champ, said he would have prodigy like results.

Well if that is the standard HE set....please list the accomplishments for a 6'5" guy almost 17 that I should be impressed with compared to the guys week after week Zoo Tennis tells about winning futures and top ITFs at 15-17 years old.

I will wait....go ahead and list the tournament wins over the last year. I listed those of the Japanese kid, the Aussie kid, and have listed others the past month. You list DB's.

So you are able to predict two 15-17 year olds who will beyond a shadow of a doubt make it. Congratulations, you're a true tennis clairvoyant.

So if a player does not develop at the ages you come up with, it won't work. I see, you've identified so many pro prospects before they were 15-17 who now make money, why don't you list them?

Same old broken record. Is there anything you're saying that has not been said? Same goes for Brad.

I will say if it was your daughter in the practice games you would see it different. You'll deny it, but you would. You tooted her horn about some great results in some local yocal tournament against 12 year olds. According to your book that means something. You tooted her horn about practicing with older players before, but did not say it did not matter.

You move the bar to suit your position.
 
Last edited:
andfor....speaking of a broken record, we have been through this. I have said a bunch of times, DBs results are great. I congratulated them over and over. He can go to many colleges now.

But its all relative. BB says no college, the pros, he knows how to raise a champ, said he would have prodigy like results.

Well if that is the standard HE set....please list the accomplishments for a 6'5" guy almost 17 that I should be impressed with compared to the guys week after week Zoo Tennis tells about winning futures and top ITFs at 15-17 years old.

I will wait....go ahead and list the tournament wins over the last year. I listed those of the Japanese kid, the Aussie kid, and have listed others the past month. You list DB's.

Could you give us Djokes accomplishments through the Jrs and remember we never said we would have prodigy results in fact I believe I was clear we were not "LOOKING to dominate the jrs", TCF if we wanted no.1 we could get it but I am not stupid enough to chase points and spend the money and abandon development of his game , we showed up to OB and 3 guys ranked 300 to 400 spots ahead found out their ranking and their European championships did nothing for them.

Does he need to win yes and he will let him get his feet wet settle in and he will start taking care of business
 

andfor

Legend
Your old trick...change the subject. Stick to the specific topic....you say I belittled his results.

I am asking you to please advise me of ONE, just ONE, tournament win of note for a 6'5" guy who has trained solely for tennis for 12 years.

Then I can see how I belittled the accomplishments.

Name a player you discovered before they were 15-17,who now makes money on the ATP/WTA. You have to prove it.
 
So you are able to predict two 15-17 year olds who will beyond a shadow of a doubt make it. Congratulations, you're a true tennis clairvoyant.

So if a player does not develop at the ages you come up with, it won't work. I see, you've identified so many pro prospects before they were 15-17 who now make money, why don't you list them?

Same old broken record. Is there anything you're saying that has not been said? Same goes for Brad.

I will say if it was your daughter in the practice games you would see it different. You'll deny it, but you would. You tooted her horn about some great results in some local yocal tournament against 12 year olds. According to your book that means something. You tooted her horn about practicing with older players before, but did not say it did not matter.

You move the bar to suit your position.

AndFor he does not get development or how this sport works over all ,DB rose as high as no.3 in the nation without a tournament win and trust me there have been so many college coaches who get what were doing and have made it clear they would love to have him but also have said we see where he can go so if we change our minds please let them know!

Then you take TCF's last player Carlos Boluda won Le Petite won it 2 x I think this was the kid , this was the Messiah , Db would crush that guy right now but once again TCF doesn't understand the "road" to going pro ,he has his own set way that it has to happen.

also Boluda was brought up on clay
 

ga tennis

Hall of Fame
I still think DB has as good a shot as any other American boy. I think Brad has done an unbelievable job with Deit..I really think another voice in Deits ear with experience will be very beneficial at this point.
 

andfor

Legend
Yea^^^. He's belittled DB's results by saying stuff like the OB field was weak, but listing all the others will take too long.

Forgot about Boluda. He's probably all butt but about it. Thinks if that kid can't do it he's now some sort of expert saying no-else can. Explains everything.

I will say you two are the TT equivalent to Spy vs Spy. Y'all should stop. It's like watching two guys measure how high you can jack up your pick up trucks.
 

andfor

Legend
Actually, BB and I just look like 2 crazy tennis parents who think our kids will be great. We go back and forth, sometimes apologize, sometimes argue.

You on the other hand keep changing the subject. Your options seem clear.

1. List the accomplishments I belittled....since tennis is about winning tournaments at every level, I expect you to list those wins he has in the 18s, top ITFs, jr slams, futures.

2. Admit you were wrong if you can not find any wins that I belittled.

You say listing the wins will take too long.,...I have time...go for it.

You congratulate his result and caveat them with a "but". You know it, everyone knows it. Very passive aggressive.
 
Top