T
TCF
Guest
==========================
Last edited by a moderator:
Very true. But are we following the players close enough to make predictions anyway?
For example, Tomic was posting results as a 15-16 year old, as was Nadal. So many would have predicted they would make money in tennis. But I do not pay enough attention to the ITFs and Euro tournaments to pull other guys out.
Its also possible to reverse engineer it. Pull the 20 youngest top 100 players out and see if they had success at age 15-16.
Tell me the name of a 14, 15 or 16 yr. old with no ATP rank or a very low one that will make it? Then let's track it.That will be impressive. Other than knowing the pitfalls of trying to play any professional sport when on emarks on that path, I see very little value in tooting that horn.
Saying (insert players name) won't make a living on the pro tour is like saying you won't win the lottery.
Tell me the name of a 14, 15 or 16 yr. old with no ATP rank or a very low one that will make it? Then let's track it.That will be impressive. Other than knowing the pitfalls of trying to play any professional sport when on emarks on that path, I see very little value in tooting that horn.
Saying (insert players name) won't make a living on the pro tour is like saying you won't win the lottery.
One factor we are leaving out in development is coaching. Hard to believe that someone who never played, never picked up a racquet, had no interest in the sport until 12 years ago, is equal to coaching32yrs- who has spent thousands of hours on the court competing and is regarded by his peers as a classic tennis overachiever- great tennis mind woefully short on talent. Somehow the guy who never played understands tennis better? Makes no sense. There are levels, as in playing. Coaching 32 vs Jeff Salzenstein who played years on the pro tour, great thinker- he's light years ahead of coach32. Gilbert is ahead of Salzenstein. Yet a player whose coach never played, never picked up a racquet is fully developed? Explain.
Let everyone do there own homework but I agree coaching is a huge part and thats why I take credit for what my player has done !
Not sure Coach. Uncle Toni drive Rafa like a maniac. Made Coach #1 look like tinkerbell. Rafa's parents wanted to stop it a few times. It's in Rafa's book. Also, I saw Rafa at age 17 with those bulging biceps. Would Rafa's talent blossomed with you or I? We are *****cats compared to Uncle Toni.
Things like credit and respect can't be taken or claimed. They are earned.
In most cases I have seen, those who try to take credit or claim respect end up losing more of it than they gain. I think we are seeing a real life example of that right here.
Why don't you just give your player all the credit and let it go at that. Isn't his success enough reward for you. Or do you really need to read posts you have written on a message board calling yourself the greatest coach to get full satisfaction from your boy's tennis
Maybe in your world ! In mine "reality" when people asked who built his forehand I say I did , I studied video ,I showed it to him ,he followed my instructions he has a nice forehand who gets credit me , when he goes out and win a match he gets credit he did the work out there , funny when he won Bornas coach came up shook my hand and said coach "you" did a great job with him then he went on and shook DB's hand and said great win , great fight !
so do I take credit sure why not ?
I don't call myself the greatest coach its Number1coach to you !
I get it. This is about you.
so do I take credit sure why not ?
Maybe in your world ! In mine "reality" when people asked who built his forehand I say I did , I studied video ,I showed it to him ,he followed my instructions he has a nice forehand who gets credit me , when he goes out and win a match he gets credit he did the work out there , funny when he won Bornas coach came up shook my hand and said coach "you" did a great job with him then he went on and shook DB's hand and said great win , great fight !
so do I take gredit sure why not?
You need to forget about the past. His success or failure in futures and challengers is all that matters now.
On the topic of picking out guys at 15-17 with bright futures and possibly making money some day:
Seventeen-year-old Yoshihito Nishioka of Japan. Won the $15,000 Futures in Mexico last week without dropping a set in any of his eight wins. Reached the finals of other futures after just turning 16. Semis in a Jr. Slam at age 16.
has DB dominated at the 18s level?
Not sure that Futures are the next level. In a month, he turns 17 and ages up into the 18s. No more claims of "playing two age divisions up" at that point. He has two years in the 18s before aging out. Can he win a super-national USTA event in the 18s, or a comparable non-USTA (ITF) event? That would be a great indicator.
On the theory that you dominate at one level, then move on to the next level, has DB dominated at the 18s level?
Yes, the Aussie kid is also one to watch.
By the way, the Japanese kid also got to the semis of the US Open jrs. Kid knows how to win.
BB....to answer Clark's question, I do not think you guys are going for Zoos and 18s are you? I thought it was now the futures like the international guys we are talking about.
Looking at the OB field these days it looks like the top ITF boys are going the futures route anyway.
We're off topic. Can we get please get back to discussing the candy and cell phones.
How much can u really say about candy and cell phones?? I would rather hear about DB and other juniors.
I think we have talked about this BB.....people get on me when I mention success in practice settings vs older girls, and now I realize they are right.
None of it matters. All that matters is what players do in structured matches. This Japanese kid is winning....futures, semis in futures, semis in jr. slams.
Totally irrelevant what he does in a practice setting. Tennis is full of stories about how this player or that did great vs some known player in a practice setting.
The only thing that matters is which player wins when they start playing for real, in a tournament with a prize.
I think we have talked about this BB.....people get on me when I mention success in practice settings vs older girls, and now I realize they are right.
None of it matters. All that matters is what players do in structured matches. This Japanese kid is winning....futures, semis in futures, semis in jr. slams.
Totally irrelevant what he does in a practice setting. Tennis is full of stories about how this player or that did great vs some known player in a practice setting.
The only thing that matters is which player wins when they start playing for real, in a tournament with a prize.
andfor....speaking of a broken record, we have been through this. I have said a bunch of times, DBs results are great. I congratulated them over and over. He can go to many colleges now.
But its all relative. BB says no college, the pros, he knows how to raise a champ, said he would have prodigy like results.
Well if that is the standard HE set....please list the accomplishments for a 6'5" guy almost 17 that I should be impressed with compared to the guys week after week Zoo Tennis tells about winning futures and top ITFs at 15-17 years old.
I will wait....go ahead and list the tournament wins over the last year. I listed those of the Japanese kid, the Aussie kid, and have listed others the past month. You list DB's.
andfor....speaking of a broken record, we have been through this. I have said a bunch of times, DBs results are great. I congratulated them over and over. He can go to many colleges now.
But its all relative. BB says no college, the pros, he knows how to raise a champ, said he would have prodigy like results.
Well if that is the standard HE set....please list the accomplishments for a 6'5" guy almost 17 that I should be impressed with compared to the guys week after week Zoo Tennis tells about winning futures and top ITFs at 15-17 years old.
I will wait....go ahead and list the tournament wins over the last year. I listed those of the Japanese kid, the Aussie kid, and have listed others the past month. You list DB's.
Your old trick...change the subject. Stick to the specific topic....you say I belittled his results.
I am asking you to please advise me of ONE, just ONE, tournament win of note for a 6'5" guy who has trained solely for tennis for 12 years.
Then I can see how I belittled the accomplishments.
So you are able to predict two 15-17 year olds who will beyond a shadow of a doubt make it. Congratulations, you're a true tennis clairvoyant.
So if a player does not develop at the ages you come up with, it won't work. I see, you've identified so many pro prospects before they were 15-17 who now make money, why don't you list them?
Same old broken record. Is there anything you're saying that has not been said? Same goes for Brad.
I will say if it was your daughter in the practice games you would see it different. You'll deny it, but you would. You tooted her horn about some great results in some local yocal tournament against 12 year olds. According to your book that means something. You tooted her horn about practicing with older players before, but did not say it did not matter.
You move the bar to suit your position.
Name a player you discovered before they were 15-17,who now makes money on the ATP/WTA. You have to prove it.
Actually, BB and I just look like 2 crazy tennis parents who think our kids will be great. We go back and forth, sometimes apologize, sometimes argue.
You on the other hand keep changing the subject. Your options seem clear.
1. List the accomplishments I belittled....since tennis is about winning tournaments at every level, I expect you to list those wins he has in the 18s, top ITFs, jr slams, futures.
2. Admit you were wrong if you can not find any wins that I belittled.
You say listing the wins will take too long.,...I have time...go for it.