Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by 5555, Jul 22, 2013.
If he's coming from Canada, then from the north...
Lol, you are crazy man. But that is why I like you.
Why did he lose an argument? Is that your opinion that not replying to you is losing an argument or is it a fact?
Also ,is you saying someone losing an argument a fact that he lost an argument or is it only your opinion that he lost an argument?
I think it's a fact that it is only your opinion that not replying to your argument is losing the argument.
You have problems with reality and perceptions of reality. Also there is a difference between baseless opinions and opinions based on facts and logical reasoning.
Sometimes we don't have enough facts and things are subjective. In that case ad populum argument is valid.
If you read this sentence, you lost the argument.
Nevermind, I was beaten to it.
He should approach Cincinnatti via Cincy Tourney director. TW forum is no help in that regard.
What a stupid question. Do you believe Novak did not put more effort win the last RG than Rome?
I explained why he lost the argument in my previous post.
In this case it's a fact.
No, I have not.
No. He put equal effort into both.
Assuming he's coming from the east, take I-70 to Columbus then bear left onto I-71.
1st is rogers m1k then cincy m1k,,since they are close together, he should take nytol and got lots of zzzz's
No, he has not.
Djokovic will kill the current version of Federer. Murray is the guy to worry about and i wouldn't be surprised if Murray won Cincinnati and the uso.
Is that a fact or an opinion?
Is it a fact or an opinion that this thread is pointless?
He should approach the way he usually does- win match by match.
Separate names with a comma.