Irvin
Talk Tennis Guru
In the series of pictures it is hard to see but the mark moved less than the bottom cross I would guess about half the width of the string and I am not sure why. For each of the three knots (one main and two crosses) I wanted to keep out as many variables as I could so I pulled tension with the tension head at 48 pounds. The racket was strung at 57 pounds.
Now for the bottom cross. Same sequence as the top cross except the picture when I released the clamp does not show the drawback well. The camera was out of focus. But the drawback initially was about the same as the top cross very slight. After jumping and banging on the racket the bottom cross moved more. It moved about the width of the string from when the string was marked. That would be 1.22 mm give or take less than my eye can detect.
I hope I have not been too wordy and have explained this well. Sorry for all the threads.
Irvin
Now for the bottom cross. Same sequence as the top cross except the picture when I released the clamp does not show the drawback well. The camera was out of focus. But the drawback initially was about the same as the top cross very slight. After jumping and banging on the racket the bottom cross moved more. It moved about the width of the string from when the string was marked. That would be 1.22 mm give or take less than my eye can detect.
I hope I have not been too wordy and have explained this well. Sorry for all the threads.
Irvin