Tennis_Bum
Professional
Socal Junior Sectionals... 4th Seed B18s.
Is the draw posted yet? I don't see it.
Socal Junior Sectionals... 4th Seed B18s.
“Tennis is now all about defense,” Kovacs said. “It’s about lateral movement. And this in turn requires foot speed, along with power in the hips and core.”
Here is from the above NY times article, real nice article around US open last year.
Good article. Of course, they fired Mayotte,( although before the firing they said he was the greatest thing since sliced bread),
so the article does have some bias in him slamming the USTA PD.
I heard his biggest complaint was that the place was like a revolving door with the coaches.
It's Robert Lansdorp not Lansthorp hahaha... Pete said he would send his kid to him if he wanted to play tennis. Says something.
http://backyardtennis.blogspot.com/
Where were my facts wrong ? A misspelled name ? Robert is a better coach then all the USTA coaches combined "Thats a fact" ? Or are you here to promote your great academy?
^^^do you really not know how to look up a tournament and draws? What is next, what is he wearing?
Junior development is a roll of the dice. Champions are born not made. No?
Junior development is a roll of the dice. Champions are born not made. No?
The U.S.T.A. will earn an estimated $200 million from the Open this year, and a good deal of it will go into player development, as it has since 2008.
“I can’t tell you the overall figure,” Blackman said. “Our regional training centers receive anywhere from $8,000 to $100,000 a year depending on the program and players. I don’t know how that compares to programs overseas.”
Babys are born , talent is spotted ,then and athlete is built and that becomes a Champion.
You never break even at a Futures event, unless you're sleeping 4 to a room or manage to find a family that'll house you for the week. Its pretty bad. $500mill to renovate a centre that was brand new back in 1998? No comment.
^^^ I don't know about talent... it's all hard work, a bit of luck and doing some right stuff on the way ... when Sampras and Davenport started tennis,their parents didn't dream that they would be tennis champions .. they were lucky to be around Robert L., he had a good thing back then and he disciplines the kids to do everything right.. only Tracy Austin was bred to be a tennis champion(same with A.A.) , it was all a bit of 'brain-washing' and hard work.. just like the Williams sister and Tiger Woods.. their parents told them everyday that they were to become great champions and they all bought it,believed it,and work hard on a singular goal... same thing now is going on with Deit B. .. keep working hard and have the inner belief that ''you can do it" and it will be done.. just keep looking up and don't let people drag you down... keep going bro..
If the USTA is that awful, it's the parents' faults for being so shortsighted.
Thanks, I'll be there to watch the DB. It will be nice to see how his game is developing.
So what was your conclusion ?
Having more tennis players doesn't lead to more champions. The USTA PD money should go to just those players that are trying to make it professionally. Fund ITF traveling teams with players mostly 15 and up, 14 for the girls. Have the top teams play ATP/WTA events as well. We would dominate the ITF rankings and the players can receive the professional coaching input they need at the right time, on the road playing matches.
Players will learn to love the life or not, and excel or fall off accordingly.
If you going to put money into kids' tennis, then go to the poor areas and recruit some of the best future athletes in the world into tennis. This may be our only way to have US players become world champions in today's athletic tennis arena.
I was only talking about Player Development money. Of course the game needs to be develop and grow to help the industry thrive and make more USTA members. This part of the USTA is going well. The PD money needs to have a more direct effect on professional success. When 90% of the kids being trained don't really want to be pros, you are being ineffective with the pro goal. Boca seems to be working well.
^^^Would it be fair to have PD kids/parents sign an agreement accepting the fact that USTA/PD investing into develping the talents into pro tennis career and (hopefully) to be the next American champion(s).
If it will turn out that junior accept college scholarship and never turn pro within 4 years of college, junior or the family has to pay PD back the money(even low as 50%).
This might help prevent PD pouring money into a wrong candidate or youth/family abusing the privilege.
Might upset some people currently in PD but just a suggestion.
I don't think it's about being fair or unfair. The fact is that very few teenagers turn pro and make it. College was a great "minor league" for Isner. Should every academy that invests in a player make a parent sign the same agreement?
I'll drop Isner as the college poster child if you stop playing the height card. Height alone does not make one a great tennis player. College is the best path for 99.99999% of the kids.
The reason Isner is ranked where he is, and has had the results he's had, is because of his serve, which is because of his height, not a result of him going to college. If Isner was about 6'2"-6'3", we wouldnt be talking about him.
While people bring up Isner, they don't mention the many 6'4+ junior players that hardly get to a good college and the many that quit because they deal with so many back issues and other related maladies. Knees, feet, shoulders - all related to the spine being torqued and it more susceptible because of the height. Height means a lot in bball, in tennis, at some point, it can be a liability not an asset, plain and simple.
Isner is not 6'2 or 6'3 so the IF argument while convenient, is pure silliness. Besides, height does not guarantee a dominant serve nor does height guarantee that the rest of your game is in order. The reason Isner is ranked near the top is because he put the required work into his game and his fitness, he has a game plan that is built around his strengths, and he beats many of the players in front of him on the draw sheet.
Whatever. What would you consider to be Isner's most devastating shot??? Do you think that shot would be what it is if he were 5'9"'???
Nothing silly about what I said. Roddick said the same thing.
Whatever. What would you consider to be Isner's most devastating shot??? Do you think that shot would be what it is if he were 5'9"'???
Nothing silly about what I said. Roddick said the same thing.
Isner's best shot is his 2nd serve on the Ad side. And your question about Isner's best shot if he were 5'9... well he's not 5'9 so it's a pointless discussion.
I don't care what Roddick said about Isner as I'm not a huge Andy fan. Sure Roddick had a nice serve but he could've had a much better career had he worked on his volleys, his backhand and his fitness earlier in his career.
Excluding the rare exception of a freak of nature, juniors should go to college. The Cahill's and the Gilberts of the world are of the same mindset. College afforded John Isner, Todd Martin, John McEnroe, James Blake, etc... the opportunity to work on their games. Go ahead and use whomever you want to in your examples.It's not pointless. This started with you using Isner as an example why jrs should go to college. My pt is Isner's height has way more to do with his success than going to college. Why not use guys like Sweeting, Levine, Russell as examples of why you should go to college???
This point started with the USTA PD paying a fortune to train many kids who have little intention of turning pro. College tennis is an excellent option for almost all juniors, but the ones with the fire, skills, size and aptitude that are being USTA funded should go on the rode and build pro careers.
As for size, Isner's is the best on tour because of his size. Isner is a great player because of many factors.
This point started with the USTA PD paying a fortune to train many kids who have little intention of turning pro. College tennis is an excellent option for almost all juniors, but the ones with the fire, skills, size and aptitude that are being USTA funded should go on the rode and build pro careers.
This point started with the USTA PD paying a fortune to train many kids who have little intention of turning pro. College tennis is an excellent option for almost all juniors, but the ones with the fire, skills, size and aptitude that are being USTA funded should go on the rode and build pro careers.
.