Sunny014
Legend
I feel this scenario would have benefitted Roger Federer.
Roger might have lost 2-3 slams to Andre-Pete during his peak, instead of 12 slams he might have won 9 in 04-07, but he would have been mentally tougher, Peter+Andre would have forced Roger to improve his game in 04-08 years and Roger would have compensated those 3 slams by maybe out clutching Novak/Rafa for an additional 4-5 slams, in the long run he might have benefitted and Rafa/Novak would have suffered .....
What do you think ???
Agassi vs Novak matches might also have happened
Peter vs Rafa also might have happened.
Sampras vs Roddick in a Pace Race (with serve).
Peter and Andre would both be using new racquets as well to adjust to modern game
So much drama between 2000-2012
Roger might have lost 2-3 slams to Andre-Pete during his peak, instead of 12 slams he might have won 9 in 04-07, but he would have been mentally tougher, Peter+Andre would have forced Roger to improve his game in 04-08 years and Roger would have compensated those 3 slams by maybe out clutching Novak/Rafa for an additional 4-5 slams, in the long run he might have benefitted and Rafa/Novak would have suffered .....
What do you think ???
Agassi vs Novak matches might also have happened
Peter vs Rafa also might have happened.
Sampras vs Roddick in a Pace Race (with serve).
Peter and Andre would both be using new racquets as well to adjust to modern game
So much drama between 2000-2012