What are your criteria for a player to be a "pigeon" for another player and (controversial) would you say Murray and Federer are pigeons of Nadal?
No Murray and Fed are not pigeons of Nadal. That is incorrect usage of the term.
Berdych and Ferrer are pigeons of Nadal. i.e. players who often do not try their best vs particular opponent and give them free pass, instead of playing hard and fighting for the win.
Berdych and Ferrer are also pigeons of Djokovic.
Don't forget Tsonga![]()
Berdych and Ferrer are also pigeons of Djokovic.
Funny you mention Ferrer who beat Nadal 2 times recently on hardcourt and clay, while he didn't beat Djokovic for ages.
The double standards of Chico, nothing new![]()
How did I ... he is pigeon number 1 for Djokovic (just in front of Granollers, lol).
Tipsa you should be ashamed of yourself :lol:
You are both misusing the word. Pigeon is not someone who losses most of the time to one player, but one who gives up before stepping on the court vs particular player.
Two quite different things.
No they are not. They always give 110% vs Djokovic, but barely 50% or even give up and retire (Berdych) vs NAdal.
That is the difference of Pigeon vs Non Pigeon.
I like when Djokovic plays Granollers, I always bet a massive amount on Djokovic, Granollers never win more than 2 games a set.
and Tsonga doesn't give up?? look at their last 4 meetings
You are not a real Djokovic fan![]()
Last 2 meetings have been 6-3 6-0 6-0 and 6-1 6-2, so that's not a bad bet at all![]()
I was joking..... I hope u r too :lol:
I like when Djokovic plays Granollers, I always bet a massive amount on Djokovic, Granollers never win more than 2 games a set.
But he does try hard and play his best. Contrary to real pigeons like Berdych.
But he does try hard and play his best. Contrary to real pigeons like Berdych.
im sorry but djokovic has crushed granollers spirit in his last 2 meetings with him
Berdych and Ferrer are also pigeons of Djokovic.
Funny you mention Ferrer who beat Nadal 2 times recently on hardcourt and clay, while he didn't beat Djokovic for ages.
The double standards of Chico, nothing new![]()
But he still tries his best.
Does not lay down roll over and surrender or intentionally lose or retire like Berdych.
But he still tries his best.
Does not lay down roll over and surrender or intentionally lose or retire like Berdych.
Berdych has given djokovic a fight in their last 3 matches. Beat djokovic in rome, 7-6 6-4 6-3 win for djokovic at Wimbledon last year and davis cup was also a tough match for djokovic 6-4 7-6 6-2. Yes I know the scoreline is one sided but if you watched the matches you would know it was not easy at all.
WTF are you talking about. Berdych is Nadal's pigeon. Not Djokovic's. He always plays more than hard and gives 120% vs Djokovic. Vs Nadal he just rolls over. So I don't get your point.
Also once more. I beg you don't fall into their trap.
WTF are you talking about. Berdych is Nadal's pigeon. Not Djokovic's. He always plays more than hard and gives 120% vs Djokovic. Vs Nadal he just rolls over. So I don't get your point.
Also once more. I beg you don't fall into their trap.
so why did you mention Ferrer for Nadal ? Ferrer is not his pigeon.
Berdych for Nadal = Tsonga for Djokovic, that's it.
Tsonga does not sent love adoring and worshiping messages to Novak over twitter.
Tsonga plays hard vs Djokovic - RG 2012 for example.
Berdych is happy to hand a match to Nadal on a silver platter every time.
Quite different.
Ferrer beats Nadal only when Nadal decides to tank. i.e. has no chance of winning a slam (USO 2007, AO 2011), or on not important tournaments where Nadal wants to preserve energy (Bercy)
Tsonga does not send love, adoring and worshiping messages to Novak over twitter.
Tsonga plays hard vs Djokovic - RG 2012 for example.
Berdych is happy to hand a match to Nadal on a silver platter every time.
Quite different.
Ferrer beats Nadal only when Nadal decides to tank. i.e. has no chance of winning a slam (USO 2007, AO 2011), or on not important tournaments where Nadal wants to preserve energy (Bercy)
oh sorry. I thought that was relevant against djokovic as well.
Apologises my dear chico!!![]()
ok yes I agree. But Tsonga has been djokovics pigeon ever since![]()
As said. You misuse a word "pigeon" here.
indian wells 2013. A joke of a match against djokovic. Shanghai 2013 Close to a joke. Roland garros 2014 I wont even talk about that. Ok Wimbledon 2014 he put up a pretty good fight but 3 out of the last 4 have been pathetic performances against a player djokovics calibre
Only because Djokovic was that much better than Tsonga, who was in bad shape and form. Tsonga did try his best on the day to beat Novak. Go back and watch their RG match this year. It was all brilliance of Djokovic, not that Tsonga didn't try. He did try but Novak was just that much better.
Berdych on the other hand...
No they are not. They always give 110% vs Djokovic, but barely 50% or even give up and retire (Berdych) vs NAdal.
That is the difference of Pigeon vs Non Pigeon.
There is no difference to any reasonable poster. I honestly believe that you are not trolling and that you truly believe that the above is true...but your extreme bias for Djokovic clouds your ability to see the truth once again.
He literally cannot ever be wrong. I think the opposite of you. I often think he HAS to be trolling because nobody can be that biased and not be aware of it.
No they are not. They always give 110% vs Djokovic, but barely 50% or even give up and retire (Berdych) vs NAdal.
That is the difference of Pigeon vs Non Pigeon.
Didn't Tsonga beat Djokovic like 4 times in a row at one point in time?I prefer to say Tsonga has been Djokovic's squab (a baby pigeon that has never flown).
Sad to say it, but Hewitt and Roddick were Federer's pigeons.
a stout seed- or fruit-eating bird with a small head, short legs, and a cooing voice, typically having grey and white plumage.
Sad to say it, but Hewitt and Roddick were Federer's pigeons.