We've been listening to your awful hatred and it's despicable. No logic in your arguments whatsoever. Just pure bashing at its best.
First of all, mr. "murraymo" - You've been on, what... 2 days on TW? You've never heard my arguments..
If you want to hear the logic behind my argument, here it is -
I dislike Murray for the following reasons;
His game - I don't particularily like how defensive Murray's game is. Where Nadal can play defensively, he gets into offensive position once the point is neutralized and the opportunity arises to be aggresive. Murray, on the other hand, has the tools and ability to play aggresive but choses to play defensively because it is the easy way out. This style won't ever win him a grand slam. Also, Murray occasionally plays like something that we all know as a "pusher". He doesn't always play like this, but when he is bossed around and is losing badly enough (like he was in the last 2 sets with Cilic), Murray seems to lack any plan "B" and gets picked apart, strategically, by his opponent. Also, Murray's second serve leaves much to be desired and Murray's inability to adjust his game costs him not only against aggressive big hitters at the slams (like Verdasco, Gonzalez, and Cilic), but also against focused players willing to play aggressive despite the conditions (Wind in Indian Wells in the final match against Nadal this year)
This goes to my second point.
Overhyping - Despite the gaping holes in Murray's game, he is often referred to as a great "tactician", "brilliant", a "genius", and possesing "deft touch" and "great hands". He is often touted as the next best thing in tennis a multiple slam winner. Much of the hype behind Murray can be attributed to the British press, which is no fault of Murray's, but is annoying nonetheless. Murray himself does little to tone down the hype (unlike Nadal when managing hype - example: questions of winning Grand Slam at beginning of the year). Murray suggested that his goals this year included (at various points); reaching #1 in the world (he said this while at #4 in the midst of Rafa domination), winning Wimbledon, and winning the US Open. Murray also tipped himself as a potential upset to win the French Open title.
Attitude - despite claims of being a gentleman, it has become apparent, to all but ardent Murray fans, that Murray has an attitude problem. On court, when things aren't going his way, Andy can act very bratty and very annoying. A great example of this is the Wawrinka-Murray match at Wimbledon earlier this year when Wawa pushed Murray to the brink and Murray would yell "c'mon" as loud as he could in the face of any unforced error or double fault coming from Wawrinka's way. In Indian Wells, Murray acted like a complete brat when debris from the stands was flying around far from the court out of the umpire's view during a point. Murray argued for a "let" call, but it was not granted. Murray proceeded to act like a brat for the entire match, put on a sour face, and completely tank - this was contrasted by Nadal who was very focused, did not let Murray fase him, and dominated the match.
------------------------
Those are my reasons. Pick them apart as you wish, but don't write off my arguments and opinions as "hating" and "illogical" if you've got nothing better to say in response.
I didn't just wake up one day and say "hey I really dislike this guy Murray". I initially was neutral to him. You might even say I kind of liked him. But as I've seen more and more of him in 2009, I have to say I really dislike him and there are few players I dislike and have ever disliked like I do Murray. I am not generally a hater - as a Nadal fan, I resist the natural urge of most Nadal fans on TW to bash Federer.
So, please consider what I've said, if you will
Thanks