I don't see Alcaraz as anything more than a Jim Courier level player

[BGod]

Nah man - they play when they play. By your point nothing any of the youngsters achieve will be worth anything. Which is bu££sh*t.

Correction, most future players' achievements are below that of older legends for the simple fact that draws get easier due to things such as 32 seeding, pampered scheduling, etc, there is way more money, advanced in medicine and training, etc, etc, etc.

I love when they do experiments that most pros refuse to partake when they even the playing field with old equipment and see how modern players do.

Major props to Andre De Grasse for taking such a challenge several years back.

Now people are under hyping him lol.

He is and always an Agassi level player. Right around 8 slams.

On paper, Agassi was immensely more talented. What's more is he was both a prodigy in his 17-20 period and an old lion in his post 30 years.

 

[FeroBango]

Different papers for different folks. Alcaraz is the most talented since Federer, and Agassi himself is as talented as they come.

So this is a moot argument.