I saw Murray won a 4th slam

[Micheal Federer]

This isn't just a prediction thread. This is a thread made from what I saw and have conviction about. I know physically, it doesn't look like it. But it's the same way I saw and was convinced before making this thread.

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/federer-to-win-a-slam-in-2017.579075/

Fed was out for six months and hadn't won a slam for five years. Yet it came to pass.
Even though Murray isn't currently a favourite and he's just returning to fitness, I saw that he'll win a 4th slam, even though I can't say which slam or when.
The thread will be bumped when he wins it.

 

[weakera]

Not going to happen. It would be monumental if he ever reaches a QF again at a slam.

 

[Micheal Federer]

Not going to happen. It would be monumental if he ever reaches a QF again at a slam.

Same way Fed was never going to win a slam again, yet he's won 3 slams since I made this thread. https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/federer-to-win-a-slam-in-2017.579075/

 

[Born_to_slice]

Tipsarevic said the same in some podcast last year. That Murray will win another slam, that is. After seeing him play in Cincy*, I think it's possible.

 

[TheNachoMan]

Murray can definitely win Wimbledon again. None of the youngsters are any good on grass

 

[weakera]

Same way Fed was never going to win a slam again, yet he's won 3 slams since I made this thread. https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/federer-to-win-a-slam-in-2017.579075/

I'm happy for you that you made that thread. Clearly, it means a lot to you.

However, Andy Murray will not be winning another grandslam nonetheless.

 

[Micheal Federer]

I'm happy for you that you made that thread. Clearly, it means a lot to you.

However, Andy Murray will not be winning another grandslam nonetheless.

Lol. It doesn't necessarily mean a lot. It only shows that I saw something that seems impossible and it came to pass against all odds.
I saw another one on the 20th of September 2020 against all odds too that Murray will win a 4th slam.
Time will tell if it'll come to pass or not.

 

[Mainad]

This isn't just a prediction thread. This is a thread made from what I saw and have conviction about. I know physically, it doesn't look like it. But it's the same way I saw and was convinced before making this thread.

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/federer-to-win-a-slam-in-2017.579075/

Fed was out for six months and hadn't won a slam for five years. Yet it came to pass.
Even though Murray isn't currently a favourite and he's just returning to fitness, I saw that he'll win a 4th slam, even though I can't say which slam or when.
The thread will be bumped when he wins it.

Of all the threads ever started on this forum this is the one I most want to see bumped!

 

[Deleted member 22147]

There's as much chance of Murray winning another slam as there is someone like Guido Pella.

It would be a huge achievement for him to reach another quarter-final stage.

 

[James P]

I'm in the "X to doubt" camp too.

 

[rUDin 21]

Honestly I don't believe it's going to happen.But it would be awesome if he somehow does it.

 

[Liam Grennon]

If he hits a hot streak and stays healthy I think he can do it again. He's a champion, no matter how many hip surgery's he has he will remain a champ.

 

[PilotPete]

Did you also see the depths of your anuss during this vision?

 

[BeatlesFan]

Not going to happen. It would be monumental if he ever reaches a QF again at a slam.

Anyone who saw Andy’s movement at the USO knows he can’t win another slam. Sadly he’s as slow as a crippled snail these days.

 

[Born_to_slice]

Anyone who saw Andy’s movement at the USO knows he can’t win another slam. Sadly he’s as slow as a crippled snail these days.

He beat Tiafoe and Zverev in Cincy. If Zverev can make a slam final, Murray can too, at least in theory.

 

[heninfan99]

If he ever faces Schwartzman his other hip will break.

 

[MeatTornado]

He's already overachieved by even being able to compete at the Masters and Slam level again.

It's great just to see him on court again doing what he loves. We shouldn't even be talking about titles with him.

 

[Lleytonstation]

He's already overachieved by even being able to compete at the Masters and Slam level again.

It's great just to see him on court again doing what he loves. We shouldn't even be talking about titles with him.

I really dont think he is either. He just seems to be enjoying himself again.

 

[Deleted member 771911]

I'm a bit worried that Federer and Murray are being put in the same camp here.
Federer did it because he's, er, Federer.
Murray and Federer are world's apart in what they have achieved and what they are capable of.

 

[r2473]

Of all the threads ever started on this forum this is the one I most want to see bumped!

Bump

 

[Mainad]

I'm a bit worried that Federer and Murray are being put in the same camp here.
Federer did it because he's, er, Federer.
Murray and Federer are world's apart in what they have achieved and what they are capable of.

Advise you stop worrying and go and take a chill pill.

 

[Liam Grennon]

I'm a bit worried that Federer and Murray are being put in the same camp here.
Federer did it because he's, er, Federer.
Murray and Federer are world's apart in what they have achieved and what they are capable of.

How so? No one would argue that they have had comparable careers, but since 2005, there have only been 5 multiple grand slam winners. Fed, Nadal, Novak, Murray and Stan. Stan is a bit of an anomaly, but you have to give Murray some credit. He won't just fade into oblivion, I think he would retire if he thought he didn't have a chance of winning another grand-slam. He's not Fed, you are right, but he just like Fed is a champion, he deserves to be in the same conversation as Roger.

 

[Liam Grennon]

He's already overachieved by even being able to compete at the Masters and Slam level again.

It's great just to see him on court again doing what he loves. We shouldn't even be talking about titles with him.

Murray being back on court doing what he loves is dangerous.

 

[Deleted member 771911]

Advise you stop worrying and go and take a chill pill.

No! People need to be educated. Murray does not belong in any conversation about player potential that features Federer as the main comparison.
Blind fandom and ignorance must not prevail here!

 

[Mainad]

No! People need to be educated. Murray does not belong in any conversation about player potential that features Federer as the main comparison.
Blind fandom and ignorance must not prevail here!

Murray has beaten Federer 11 times in his career (more than any other player outside the Big 3) and that includes in 3 big finals. Go and do your homework while you're taking the chill pill.

 

[Deleted member 771911]

How so? No one would argue that they have had comparable careers, but since 2005, there have only been 5 multiple grand slam winners. Fed, Nadal, Novak, Murray and Stan. Stan is a bit of an anomaly, but you have to give Murray some credit. He won't just fade into oblivion, I think he would retire if he thought he didn't have a chance of winning another grand-slam. He's not Fed, you are right, but he just like Fed is a champion, he deserves to be in the same conversation as Roger.

Aren't you comparing part of their career though?
Federer achieved what he did in 2017 because he is one of the GOATs. A supremely talent played, one of the greatest, with huge fighting qualities and mental strength.
Murray is...Murray. A champion yes, but moderately on the scale of things and when Federer is at the top of the scale and in the conversation. I see now AO 2017 Federer comeback for him. He could barely win slams when he was No.1.

 

[Deleted member 771911]

Murray has beaten Federer 11 times in his career (more than any other player outside the Big 3) and that includes in 3 big finals. Go and do your homework while you're taking the chill pill.

I know this stat.
I am afraid your blind fandom means you are not listening to my argument.
I am not saying Murray is not a champion. I am not saying he cannot beat Federer. I am saying he does not have the qualities Federer has which enabled Federer to win AO 2017. Federer is Federer, One of the greatest players of all time. Murray is top 30 all time. A great player, but no AO 2017 runs for him. A heartwarming early round loss, though.

 

[Rebel-I.N.S]

With a good draw at Wimbledon, and with months of competitive play to improve his conditioning - you just never know.

Look up Murray’s stats on grass. He’s got some unbelievable numbers.

10 consecutive years reaching the Wimby QF is no joke.

 

[Shaolin]

This isn't just a prediction thread. This is a thread made from what I saw and have conviction about. I know physically, it doesn't look like it. But it's the same way I saw and was convinced before making this thread.

https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/federer-to-win-a-slam-in-2017.579075/

Fed was out for six months and hadn't won a slam for five years. Yet it came to pass.
Even though Murray isn't currently a favourite and he's just returning to fitness, I saw that he'll win a 4th slam, even though I can't say which slam or when.
The thread will be bumped when he wins it.

Can't respect your predictions since you can't even spell Michael correctly.

 

[Liam Grennon]

Aren't you comparing part of their career though?
Federer achieved what he did in 2017 because he is one of the GOATs. A supremely talent played, one of the greatest, with huge fighting qualities and mental strength.
Murray is...Murray. A champion yes, but moderately on the scale of things and when Federer is at the top of the scale and in the conversation. I see now AO 2017 Federer comeback for him. He could barely win slams when he was No.1.

I am comparing an attribute which applies to both of them. Fed's injury didn't nearly compare to the severity of Murray's injury, and Fed plays a game which is far less physically taxing. But what exactly are you implying Fed has that Murray doesn't that would let Fed win a slam after injury that wouldn't let Murray. Again, Murray's injury was far more severe, but at the same time this current Era is weaker than it was in 2017.

 

[tennis_pro]

With a good draw at Wimbledon, and with months of competitive play to improve his conditioning - you just never know.

Look up Murray’s stats on grass. He’s got some unbelievable numbers.

10 consecutive years reaching the Wimby QF is no joke.

pre hip numbers

 

[Micheal Federer]

Can't respect your predictions since you can't even spell Michael correctly.

Smiles
I created the account when I didn't think spelling was important.
I've tried to change it to the correct spelling years ago, but they were giving some conditions before I can undergo name change.

 

[FRV3]

Murray actually could have won this US Open that just happened if he were given a draw that suits him. For instance, give Murray Zverev's draw, but replace Coric with Zverev. Murray has a shot if Thiem gets tight like he did in the final. Just sayin fellas.