Why not? We don't know how long vaccine mandates will last.As things stand, Djokovic won't be allowed to play there at 36, 37 and 38
Don't see him winning 39 onwards
Ban can be easily overturned. Said so by Alex Hawke himself.Bad trolling OP since Djokovic is not going to play in AO again due to 3 years ban.
Ban can be easily overturned. Said so by Alex Hawke himself.
Ban can be easily overturned. Said so by Alex Hawke himself.
Yes. If he gets vaccinated then appeals the ban, the appeal will be accepted.Just to confirm, as of today, Djokovic has a 3 year ban to enter Australia, or not?
Does this mean, if he vaccinates today and waits the needed time, could he enter Australia?
Just to confirm, as of today, Djokovic has a 3 year ban to enter Australia, or not?
Does this mean, if he vaccinates today and wait the needed time, could he enter Australia?
So the three year ban is on as of today, if nothing is done.Yes. If he gets vaccinated then appeals the ban, the appeal will be accepted.
I think people are not looking to the future and just focusing on recent events. It would really really shock me if Djokovic is not playing AO next year.Too many variables at this stage ...
1/ We may see new COVID-19 variants or a new pandemic of a different virus appear that necessitate new vaccines.
2/ New vaccines may necessitate ongoing Vaccine mandates.
3/ Alex Hawke and his political party may not be in power by the time the next AO comes around. Who knows what Law will rule then.
4/ Djokovic may decide to turns his back an any future AO appearances.
5/ Djokovic may sustain an injury that prevents him from playing at the AO again.
Unless something really unexpected happens with SARS-CoV-2, it is unlikely we will see any political obstacles to Djokovic playing the AO again.
But then, SARS-CoV-2 was highly unexpected ... at least by most members of the public ... and we know what happened with that.
(I think it funny that most people think SARS-CoV-2 is a "one off" and that we are over this, we won't see another one for another 100 years. Science suggests otherwise. As the world opens up more and more, and humans penetrate deeper and deeper into unknown territories, the likelihood of the spread of deadly viruses actually increases significantly.)
Correct.So the three year ban is on as of today, if nothing is done.
After Nole’s recent statements, it would not shock me as something improbable.I think people are not looking to the future and just focusing on recent events. It would really really shock me if Djokovic is not playing AO next year.
Not as I understand it. He has to have grounds for the ban to be set aside, namely compassionate or compelling reasons. Wanting to play sport isnt a compassionate or a compelling reason.Yes. If he gets vaccinated then appeals the ban, the appeal will be accepted.
So many days between now and the next AO. I guess I'm just counting on Novak wisening up by then. I think he'll realise at some point that the "risk" of getting a vaccine is well worth it. Billions of people have had vaccines and are fine, logically how could it be worse than being infected with the coronavirus? He's also not going to enjoy missing so many slams and that's going to get to him if he starts to realise his chances of winning the slam race are becoming non-existent.After Nole’s recent statements, it would not shock me as something improbable.
Alex Hawke said it himself as well as many others after his ban. I trust him more than the article. But the article says in the second paragraph below the ban remove section that you can still apply for a visa under certain grounds.Not as I understand it. He has to have grounds for the ban to be set aside, namely compassionate or compelling reasons. Wanting to play sport isnt a compassionate or a compelling reason.
No matter whether he gets vaccinated or the vaccine restrictions are lifted, he’s subject to a re entry ban and doesn’t seem to fit the criteria for appeal.
Which would count him out of the AO until 2025
It doesn’t really matter what the politicians say, the law is the law and he’s no exception to it.Alex Hawke said it himself as well as many others after his ban. I trust him more than the article. But the article says in the second paragraph below the ban remove section that you can still apply for a visa under certain grounds.
One variable is the result of the Australian elections later this year. Different governments might take different views of his case. The far left, authoritarian, liberal-communist-fascist government of the Liberal-National Coalition is pursuing the hard border policy, but given that politics are like a horseshoe, the even further left, authoritarian, socialist-communist-fascist Labor opposition might be more moderate because it's so far left, it's right.
It totally does matter and it matters more than an article. He can play AO23 if he is vaccinated. That is the only certainty.It doesn’t really matter what the politicians say, the law is the law and he’s no exception to it.
Do you mean apply for a permanent visa instead?
It’s not an article, it’s an immigration lawyers website lol. It states what the law is. He can’t get his ban lifted unless he has grounds under Australian law. Not sure why that’s so hard to grasp.It totally does matter and it matters more than an article. He can play AO23 if he is vaccinated. That is the only certainty.
Our prime minister is right wing...
Why funny? I thought you said in another thread that you want to see him competing in the majors again?As funny as it would be if he is banned for 3 years, it's just not going to happen.
Unless we keep our vaccine mandates in place for next year's Aus open, he'll be here.
Nah, he's not banned for 3 years just yet. And I doubt he will be.He won't ever play AO again.
1. He's technically banned for 3 years with extremely unlikely chance this change for 23 so he'd be allowed back 24 at the earliest and popular support unlikely.
2. Why would he want to come back unless he felt he couldn't be Slam leader without it? It would be downright pathetic to stoop down.
That said it is absolutely the old man Slam with Rosewall winning it at 36/37, Agassi won it at 32, Lendl at 30, etc.
Nah, he's not banned for 3 years just yet. And I doubt he will be.
It's still fixable. He can always apply for another visa.
What I've heard (and others here have stated as well), is that the 3 year ban was enforced the moment he lost the deportation appeal. They're open to lifting the ban, probably if he vaccinates, or if the pandemic is over, but as of now he is banned for three years.Nah, he's not banned for 3 years just yet. And I doubt he will be.
Why funny? I thought you said in another thread that you want to see him competing in the majors again?
I hope he refuses to return.
If I were he I would definitely come there and get #10. At the end of the day who cares about what happened? People only talk about numbers and legacy. And wouldn't it be epic should he come back and annihilate everyone at his pet slam to show that what happened didn't affect him badly? What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Period.If I was djokovic I wouldn’t want to go back after how they treated him.