If Nadal beats Fed he has proven he is undisputably better

Luminaire

Semi-Pro
Please don't put unnecessarily high stake on this match.

Nadal has proven he is a superior player than Federer since he was 17.

No further proof is necessary. In general, the records will follow.
TDK can't wait. Everyone on this board must acquiesce tonight.
 
No, nadal was certainly handicapped a little but fed is old. Only matches till end of 2010 count certainly nothing after feds 30th birthday. It is stupid to only count till end of 07 because that excludes most of nadals prime but I think end of 2010 is a fair cutoff for both.
 

FlamEnemY

Hall of Fame
Age completely not a factor for one tournament . You can be perfectly fine for one tournament much less one match.....
This statement is absolutely wrong. Age always plays a role. Though I wonder how much, considering Nadal has been playing seriously since he was 17 y.o.

And just a quick question, is English your native language?
 

Crisstti

Legend
No, nadal was certainly handicapped a little but fed is old. Only matches till end of 2010 count certainly nothing after feds 30th birthday. It is stupid to only count till end of 07 because that excludes most of nadals prime but I think end of 2010 is a fair cutoff for both.
Fed was number 1 in 2012 though.

Anyway, you guys are taking TDK too seriously.
 
Top