How predictable, the Fed Fanboy circus has come to town.
It was only a week ago that the Fed Fanboys and Djokotrolls were celebrating the difficulty of Nadal's draw. Side effects of Djoker having a joke of a draw were that a) he wasn't in form and b) when he lost there's no one to be in the finals with a strong chance to win.
Whining crying babies is what you are...
How predictable, the Fed Fanboy circus has come to town.
It was only a week ago that the Fed Fanboys and Djokotrolls were celebrating the difficulty of Nadal's draw. Side effects of Djoker having a joke of a draw were that a) he wasn't in form and b) when he lost there's no one to be in the finals with a strong chance to win.
Whining crying babies is what you are...
The fact that the C@pytards say that their guy has a hard draw just shows how many cake walks he's had in the past.
A hard draw for Nadal doesnt exist, unless it is R1 Davydenko R2 Davydenko R3 Del Potro R4 Del Potro R5 Djokovic R6 Djokovic R7 Djokovic
Do you really think guys this heavy Del Potro who can't move his *** enough to beat Bautista would beat Nadal ? haha
Right now, Nadal got 13 grand slams, how many times did he beat Federer and/or Djokovic to win these 13 ? Now compare with Federer. Thanks.
Federer had Roddick.
Roddick = 10Capys.
end of discussion.
Yes of course Roddick with his 1 grand slam ... :lol:
why are you so mad Blob? What you do is troll every Nadal match thread, the mods can attest to that. I do this once!
I think you've got me confused with someone else.
They are all asterisked, Fed's hardcourt slams and claycourt slam.
Self explanatory ...
- Winning without facing inform Nadal
- His nemesis Nadal
- Injured Nadal
In addition
- the unfair imposition of Anna Wintour's debilitating medusa stare on opponents
- the presence of Gavin Rossdale .... he is just unacceptable.
He is just mad nadal is winning the tournament
if nadal wins this slam the op will look like asterisk
Be really funny if Nadal d. Federer on the way to the title :mrgreen:
The hate will really flow around here then
Self explanatory thread..
- Winning without facing inform Delpo
- His nemesis Novak
- Injured Murray
In addition
- on court Coaching
- Time Violation
Nice backpedal rose petal.LOL at people claiming no luck is involved.
I am not saying that Nadal will not deserve the major. What is the harm in accepting it was with a good dosage of luck ?
Nadal has not won the tournament yet (hope he does though)
But Djokovic quest for the #1, has just taken a huge tumble.
If Nadal does win the AO, he will be 4610 point clear of Djokovic.
The pressure Djokovic said Nadal would be feeling in April, is the pressure Djokovic is feeling right now.
Moot point after Stan lifts the trophy.
Big asterisk.
It says "double career slam".
Maybe you switched off your telly/stream when Fed was serving for the match in the third at 5-4.I actually think Fed is winning this. OP twisted his panties prematurely.
Man, was Fed playing well. Vintage Fed + Huge Blister on Nadal's hand that looks like Rosie O'Donnell's face after 3 tequilas = No need for asterisks.
Your signature! :lol:
Maybe you switched off your telly/stream when Fed was serving for the match in the third at 5-4.
Thanks about the sig. I miss Chico, btw.
edit: If Fred wins this I promise never to troll Nadal fans again. I'll be a Nadal fan henceforth. I've always respected him as a person, I'd hate to see him go away.
However, if it's a Fred-Wawa final, i might just root for Stanley to win his first. I'd love to see the ecstacy on his face.
Self explanatory thread..
- Winning without facing inform Delpo
- His nemesis Novak
- Injured Murray
In addition
- on court Coaching
- Time Violation
you are a sore loserSelf explanatory thread..
- Winning without facing inform Delpo
- His nemesis Novak
- Injured Murray
In addition
- on court Coaching
- Time Violation
Big asterisk.
It says "double career slam".
Nadal only won because Dimitrov missed a simple put away forehand at the net with an open court
Rafa has beaten Djokovic in the last three slam finals....
I don't think anything about Murray ever sparkled, but heck, I am hearing this expression for the first time, so cut me some slack.Unless Nadal was doing a sparkling impression of Murray, I think you'll find it was the latter who beat Djokovic at Wimbledon.
Have we ever seen an asterisk in tennis?
Yeah, 1941-45, not played because of WWII.
Aus Open date change 1977, etc....maybe 98 bc of possible doping findings?
But i have never seen an asterisk on a completed slam simply because of the distinct sound of the whine of a gaggle of fanboys.
Unless Nadal was doing a sparkling impression of Murray, I think you'll find it was the latter who beat Djokovic at Wimbledon.
Ooh, atp boycott, yeah.Add 1973 W to the asterisk list.