RaulRamirez
Hall of Fame
...of contemporary players to ever play (with three great rivalries among Fed, Rafa and Novak), who do you consider to be the next best trio? Or if you think another trio was even better, state your case.
Nadal.More interested in who is the next Big 1 after Roger
They also came to mind for me as second best - wasn't sure whether to put Lendl in with Borg and Mac. To "qualify", I'd say that all three members would have to have at least 6 or so years when they were at the top.Connors-Borg-Mac was pretty good.
I agree. But by "next", I meant that more in the nature of Connors/Borg/Mac (who you would rank as the second best, or next best) than, say, Zverev/Tsitsipas/Shapovalov (next trio in line).I don’t think we’ll ever see a Big 3 like these anytime soon.
Oh, got it. Then it’s what you say, Zverev Tsitsipas and Shapovalov.I agree. But by "next", I meant that more in the nature of Connors/Borg/Mac (who you would rank as the second best, or next best) than, say, Zverev/Tsitsipas/Shapovalov (next trio in line).
Well, actually I meant in more in the Borg/Connors/Mac sense, but both questions/answers work!Oh, got it. Then it’s what you say, Zverev Tsitsipas and Shapovalov.
Has to be this, although Fedalovic have had so much more overlap and so many more good years.Connors-Borg-Mac was pretty good.
Well, maybe not awesome, but Aussie!Kokkinakis-kyrgios-tomic
A vulgar thug, a vulgar thug, and a vulgar thugKokkinakis-kyrgios-tomic
A vulgar thug, a vulgar thug, and a vulgar thug
The gangs all here.
He is not a nextgen playerNadal.
they're not so contemporariesGonzales, Rosewall, Laver is still the best trio, obviously.