D Deleted member 21996 Guest Dec 1, 2020 #51 JaoSousa said: Chill bro, it was a joke. Click to expand... keep your day job
RS Bionic Poster Dec 1, 2020 #53 People are so harsh on Thiem. He wouldn’t be winning heaps of majors but nevertheless.
Nadalgaenger G.O.A.T. Dec 1, 2020 #54 mike danny said: We have yet to see Thiem at 34. Click to expand... All players improve with age
Nadalgaenger G.O.A.T. Dec 1, 2020 #55 Breakpointerer said: Nah, he's not getting past Fed or Nadal in those finals Click to expand... Didn’t Thiem push Nadal to 5 tight sets at USO? Haas almost got past Fed on clay in 2009...
Breakpointerer said: Nah, he's not getting past Fed or Nadal in those finals Click to expand... Didn’t Thiem push Nadal to 5 tight sets at USO? Haas almost got past Fed on clay in 2009...
JaoSousa Hall of Fame Dec 1, 2020 #56 Gorecki said: keep your day job Click to expand... Don't have one but ok.
Beckerserve Legend Dec 1, 2020 #57 Really love Thiem. Pains me to say this but in a stronger era he was not winning majors. ROS too weak and too prone to errors on his groundies ans his serve not a reliable consistent weapon on a bad day.
Really love Thiem. Pains me to say this but in a stronger era he was not winning majors. ROS too weak and too prone to errors on his groundies ans his serve not a reliable consistent weapon on a bad day.
Sunny014 Legend Aug 15, 2021 #58 A loser in 1 era is a loser in almost any era. Thiem doesn;'t have the peak levels to win anything. 0 slams for him, not even RG 2009, Federer/Soderling won't let him reach the final.
A loser in 1 era is a loser in almost any era. Thiem doesn;'t have the peak levels to win anything. 0 slams for him, not even RG 2009, Federer/Soderling won't let him reach the final.