2012AOI would change
- 2008 Wimbledon final
- 2009 Aus Open final
- 2019 Wimbledon final
What about you ?
You can break the entire Universe if you go back and change something....ever heard of Flashpoint?
2012AO
2014AO
2018Wimb
A tear in space time continuum ? Ok that is the concept of the new movie I guess.... the sequel to the Snyder cut.
I was thinking these 3 matches would make the slams race more interesting
Fed - 23
Novak- 21
Rafa - 20
But you are right, 1 outcome changed might affect the motivation levels or preparation or outcomes of other events too...
I know it's not Open Era, but 1877 Wimbledon final
TTW would still have the same historian, but his user name would be William Marshall.I know it's not Open Era, but 1877 Wimbledon final
AO 2012 everytime.
RG 2013
USO 2013
USO 2021
Wimbledon 2007I would change
- 2008 Wimbledon final
- 2009 Aus Open final
- 2019 Wimbledon final
What about you ?
The Serbian wolf is turning into a fierce vulture.swap wimbledon 08/09 results and 2019 for federer
wimbledon 18 and rg 21 for nadal
AO 13 and 20 for djokovic
21 slams for fed
23 for nadal
17 for djokovic
That's what fans of the Swiss player always say: "He should have won x match" but they forget the times that he could have (and should have) lost like against Acasuso or Haas or Del Potro at RG, against Roddick at Wimbledon, to give only the examples of 2009 because there are more before and after that year.AO 2009 would be my first pick as a Fed fan. Yes, pretty clearly ahead of Wimbledon 2019. It’s the single match that most hurt his resume imo.
He shouldn’t have lost the match. Better player going into the final, better player during most of the final, but a few missed opportunities in the third set and that dumpster fire of a fifth set sealed the deal. If he wins that he could stall Nadal’s momentum in the rivalry and secure a huge win for his legacy. Plus he probably gets the NCYGS (08 USO - 09 W), although there could still be a domino effect. For instance, Nadal might put all his chips in RG after a loss at the AO to try to keep hold of his turf.
Wimbledon 2007
AO 2012
AO 2017
Wimbledon 2018 (the "real final)
![]()
Id rather AO19. Same result and Rafa has a 3 slam year.
2013 RG semi-final (That stupid Djokosmash be damned! Were it not for that It would have been almost guaranteed first career grand slam for Novak! Unless you are gonna convince me Ferrer would have been able to do anything with Djokovic in the final, which is laughable...)
2015 RG final (If not for that chances are CYGS would have been already completed at least once...And most importantly Djokovic would not have received bad rep for his losses to Wawrinka in slams as he ended up receiving...And Fedal fanbase wouldn't be nearly as smug as they are now...)
2021 USO final (Well for dead obvious reasons...)
hola... nadal o'connor?You can break the entire Universe if you go back and change something....ever heard of Flashpoint?
10 AO + 4 FO + 7 W + 4 USO
2 CYGS and QCGS
Godly resume with 25 slams.
1995 USO final (no explanation needed)
1999 WB final (NCYGS for Agassi do you realize how absurd that would be)
2005 USO final (becomes USO GOAT, going out on the most epic blaze of glory of any tennis player, eat it Pete)
Honorable mention to RG 1991 F
hola... nadal o'connor?
![]()
FO 2007 Final
FO 2011 Final
FO 2013 SF
[QUOTE="Sudacafan, post: 17151306, member: 75I would change
- 2008 Wimbledon final
- 2009 Aus Open final
- 2019 Wimbledon final
1970-
no way what tennis has been suffering in recent years was meant to happen... this tragedy needs to be fixedIn Terminator though, this sequence of events was meant to happen. The whole point was that John Connor was going to born because of the Terminator and Kyle going back in time.
no way what tennis has been suffering in recent years was meant to happen... this tragedy needs to be fixed
![]()