I do have concerns about 400. Its very light SW may produce some light balls. It maybe speedy but light. you can use the Head IG instinct and produce heavy balls and yet the weight of the frame is very manageble.
also You can pump some iron and you will feel like IG instict is featherly light too.
Well a funny thing happened the last couple of days. The DC Pro has emerged as my favorite. I even like it more than the IG Instinct lately. It serves great. Groundstrokes are effortless and its just a great baseline stick. Feels more solid and substantial than the Instinct. Not really feeling the V1 Classic either. The DC Pro just plays the best for me right now so I am going to give it a long hard look.
I find the Instinct has to be swung pretty fast to hit a heavy ball. It doesn't have as much plow as I would like. Thats where the DC Pro does a better job.
TM- which racquets work best for someone who hits a forehand with a continental or eastern forehand as opposed to those designed for the full western or massive brushers as you mentioned in your earlier post?
I got the DC Pro after demoing the BB London (larger head one), X8 315, Youtek Radical OS and Pro, and the DC Pro. Went with the DC Pro. My former stick was a roddick pdgt but it along w/polys was murdering my arm.
The DC Pro is similar, lets me do the same stuff, very aggressive baseline, heavy serving like the roddick pdgt but is much much easier on my elbow. I do agree with a previous poster that the DCP seems like a "club" but I love that aspect of it, and even mentioned the same word in a discussion on tennis elbow.
http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=399215
Also Tennis Mav suggested 0.5 grams at 2/4/8/10 because one issue with the DCP stock is that to me it did not seem as stable, maybe torsional issues (which i found the roddick pdgt had as well for me). That recommendation made the racquet unreal. I was nursing some TE going itno a tourny and just said forget it, went w/a poly set up w/the DCP modded w/the lead tape and it was a monster. W/o even me asking, the guy I played just commented about how much heavier the balls were coming from my end. For me Tennis Mav's recommendation on LT positioning was really huge, it really took the DCP to another level.
hey your avatar is offensive to lots of people here. Are you american ?
I do have concerns about 400. Its very light SW may produce some light balls. It maybe speedy but light. you can use the Head IG instinct and produce heavy balls and yet the weight of the frame is very manageble.
also You can pump some iron and you will feel like IG instict is featherly light too.
Yes I tried the PB V1 and liked the V1 Classic better, but they were very similar. I have a V1 Classic I could sell you for cheap and you can playlist it for as long as you like. Don't like it then just resell it for same or more?
The Dunlop 300, 400 and 500 are all Players racquets. I am trying to stay with something that is for my level, not over my head.
Jack - The 400 and 500 are no more players rackets than the IGI.
I agree. That's why I've been testing some racquets that are meant more for 3.5 level play, like the V1 Classic and the Organix 6 and Becker DC Pro. The IG Instinct and Bio 400 and 500s are slightly easier to use than more hard core players sticks like the Bio 200 or Prestige.
Just to update....after playtesting these 3 sticks I am going with the Becker Delta Core Pro for the foreseeable future.
Here is my rundown on the 3 racquets...
3rd place: V1 Classic
Nice feeling racquet. Impact feels nice. Not mushy - not stiff. Feels like a racquet that almost anyone could use. High powered but not uncontrollable. I struggled at first with the "higher launch angle" that it seems to have with my normal swing.
Works really well for hitting flat, but not the best for the modern topspin game IMO. For an 3.5 rec player with traditional, compact strokes, this is perfect. I'm sure I could adapt to it if given enough time, but it just didn't seem to fit with my game.
2nd place: Head IG Instinct
Not going to get rid of these just yet, just in case things don't work out with my top choice. Not much to complain about with this racquet...I have just come to realize that while I want a racquet for my level (3.5) I also like a decent amount of swingweight behind the ball. Many 11 oz racquets just dont feel right too me...too flimsy or whippy feeling. My swing is not "whippy", but not slow either. It's a medium speed, smoother swing and I like to use some of the racquet's mass to get my power. Lighter racquets that need swingspeed to generate power aren't for me. The Instinct does get better with added lead, but I don't want to get into an endless lead tape experiment trying to find that balance of plow and not too heavy. That said...this is a great all around racquet that does everything well. It's got a nice blend of power & control and a muted, dampened feel on impact that belies it's high stiffness rating. This one should have a large audience, especially those that want a semi-player's racquet with a lower swingweight. If you want a more substantial feeling racquet, lead is a must.
1st Place: Becker DC Pro.
This surprised me for sure. It wasn't "love at first hit" with this one and I almost discarded it quickly. It felt a little "club-like" as someone else said, but it just does everything so well and what drew my attention was the way it served. I was hitting the inside and outside corners with pace, like I never have before. Normally I get 1,2 aces per match. With the DC Pro, that number is more like 4-6. I just have more confidence playing service games with it and feel like I can control the point from the getgo.
Wonderful racquet from the baseline. My normal paced swing from the baseline gives me the right amount of power without overdoing it. It has a healthy 325 swingweight and is only 3-4 pts headlite and that puts some decent mass behind the ball without feeling sluggish. It also volleys nicely and doesn't flutter much on mishits. Seems to be one of the more stable 11 oz racquets I have ever hit.
The impact feeling (which is huge for me) is very nice. Pockety feel that is not harsh and not mush...just right. The DCP is one of those racquets exactly in the middle of the stiff/flexible spectrum. The wide hoop reminds me a little of the Head Speed's shape, so I didn't have any trouble adjusting there. Time will tell if the DC Pro will stick, but so far I don't see anything to complain about, other than the funky Becker handle, but I will get used to that again like I did while using the London. If you do a search here for the DC Pro, you cannot find hardly any negative comments about it anywhere. Everyone who tries my racquet likes it. Anyone who thinks they have the same racquet likes/dislikes as me should jump on this thing. For $89 brand new, it's the deal of the century.
BTW...check the F/S section for some good deals![]()
yep, I as able to take a few swings with the delta core pro and hated the rectangular grip shape. the rectangular grip shape makes for the the smallest feeling 4-3/8 grip I've ever felt. really funny pallet choice!
unfortunately, I didn't get to hit any balls cause they didn't demo. it was at a tennis tournament.
anyway, let me know how you change the shape of the grip? I assume your gonna try a square it up a bit. kinda of like dunlop! they have the best grip shape I think!
I think wilson is too rectangular for a semiwestern grip also, just hard to lock my grip in especially on slice. (tend to float)
when I demoed dunlop my serve slice and topspin forehand where way better. icaouldn't miss a slice with the dunlop.
wonder if you could graft a dunlop pallet onto the dcp?
Thanks for the reviews. I've been following along on the Organix threads for a while now. Your impressions of the V1 were spot on to mine from a few years back. Solid and easy to hit with good power but a little lacking in easy spin. Well suited for the flat hitter...of which I play with a few being in the mid to late 40's demographic.
I also remember liking the Becker Pro but don't recall which version I hit. It was no doubt an earlier version (I'll have to look it up). I remember power and spin but not great feel, touch or volleys. A baseline stick.
This leads me to my question. How do you compare the Becker Pro to the Organix 8 (315)? I hit with decent spin but not extreme western. I reworked my stroke about 3 years ago and modeled it after the Fuzzy Yellow Balls videos. Bit of a loopy takeback, drop and then low to high. Its a longer fuller swing than most I play with. I don't hit as hard through the court as some of the flatter hitters though.
In singles, my preferred game, I move in on short balls and continue to the net. I don't mind rallying if my opponent keeps his balls deep though. I also play quite a bit of doubles though which obviously involves volleying. Right now I switch between the C10 Pro and the Fischer Mag Tour...the C10 is great when I'm fresh and can handle it but I'm quicker on reaction volleys and hit with more spin w/ the Fischer. The Fischer is pretty solid, especially if you consider the low swing weight, but volleys are more controlled with the C10. Return of serve vs. the few hard servers I come across is more solid w/ the C10 as well.
I'm putting together a demo list and looking for input. I've hit w/ the Organix 10...fine but a little dead feeling and felt low powered. I'm actually starting to think I need a little more power than either the C10 or the Mag Tours offer. I also need a comfortable ride for my 1HBH. Thoughts?
All 9 seem like good choices, hiker (possible exception of the BLXPO). I'd be interested to hear what your opinions are once you've demoed them. I should try the Prince Team Tour and see if it lives up to the hype. So far, at around 11oz. or less, nothing touches the X10-295, imo. You said it was dead feeling. Are you talking about the X295 or the X325? I thought the X325 was a little dead feeling. Its weight and balance just didn't translate into a dynamic stick for me. I wanted to see what a more nimble version of the X325 was like and that's the only reason I tried the X295. I'm glad I did. The lighter weight lets more feedback through and higher racquet head speed is easy to generate, resulting in more power and spin than many sticks in its class.Thanks for the reply Jack. How do you like the 327 swingweight of the BDCP? I know you've mentioned 325 before as you comfort spot...not that that's a huge departure...but just curious. I've got 9 sticks on my list right now. The 4 I'm leaning toward trying are:
Volkl X8 315
Prince Tour Team
Yonex VCore 100S
Wilson BLX Pro Open
Considering:
Becker DC Pro
Becker London
Becker V1 Classic
Head IG Instinct
Prince Shark Hybrid
My strokes have changed quite a bit since I last seriously demoed about 3 years ago...though I have tried other racquets here and there. A bit ironically for these boards I think I can handle a lighter racquet now than I could before. Return of serve against hard hitters was always a concern so I liked a heavier racquet to stand up to that. I've improved in that respect now and like to take decent cuts at serves now when I can instead of just blocking back 1st serves. I also think I can control a more powerful racquet better now that I hit with more spin and am looking for more power from less work (than my Fischers) and probably a bit bigger and more forgiving headsize (than my C10 Pros). I still need to keep one eye on arm comfort though due to my 1HBH with full knowledge my form is not always perfect.
All 9 seem like good choices, hiker (possible exception of the BLXPO). I'd be interested to hear what your opinions are once you've demoed them. I should try the Prince Team Tour and see if it lives up to the hype. So far, at around 11oz. or less, nothing touches the X10-295, imo. You said it was dead feeling. Are you talking about the X295 or the X325? I thought the X325 was a little dead feeling. Its weight and balance just didn't translate into a dynamic stick for me. I wanted to see what a more nimble version of the X325 was like and that's the only reason I tried the X295. I'm glad I did. The lighter weight lets more feedback through and higher racquet head speed is easy to generate, resulting in more power and spin than many sticks in its class.
EDIT: Might want to consider Donnays like the X-Dual Gold or X-P Duals.
Thanks for the reviews. I've been following along on the Organix threads for a while now. Your impressions of the V1 were spot on to mine from a few years back. Solid and easy to hit with good power but a little lacking in easy spin. Well suited for the flat hitter...of which I play with a few being in the mid to late 40's demographic.
I also remember liking the Becker Pro but don't recall which version I hit. It was no doubt an earlier version (I'll have to look it up). I remember power and spin but not great feel, touch or volleys. A baseline stick.
This leads me to my question. How do you compare the Becker Pro to the Organix 8 (315)? I hit with decent spin but not extreme western. I reworked my stroke about 3 years ago and modeled it after the Fuzzy Yellow Balls videos. Bit of a loopy takeback, drop and then low to high. Its a longer fuller swing than most I play with. I don't hit as hard through the court as some of the flatter hitters though.
In singles, my preferred game, I move in on short balls and continue to the net. I don't mind rallying if my opponent keeps his balls deep though. I also play quite a bit of doubles though which obviously involves volleying. Right now I switch between the C10 Pro and the Fischer Mag Tour...the C10 is great when I'm fresh and can handle it but I'm quicker on reaction volleys and hit with more spin w/ the Fischer. The Fischer is pretty solid, especially if you consider the low swing weight, but volleys are more controlled with the C10. Return of serve vs. the few hard servers I come across is more solid w/ the C10 as well.
I'm putting together a demo list and looking for input. I've hit w/ the Organix 10...fine but a little dead feeling and felt low powered. I'm actually starting to think I need a little more power than either the C10 or the Mag Tours offer. I also need a comfortable ride for my 1HBH. Thoughts?
Thanks for the reply Jack. How do you like the 327 swingweight of the BDCP? I know you've mentioned 325 before as you comfort spot...not that that's a huge departure...but just curious. I've got 9 sticks on my list right now. The 4 I'm leaning toward trying are:
Volkl X8 315
Prince Tour Team
Yonex VCore 100S
Wilson BLX Pro Open
Considering:
Becker DC Pro
Becker London
Becker V1 Classic
Head IG Instinct
Prince Shark Hybrid
My strokes have changed quite a bit since I last seriously demoed about 3 years ago...though I have tried other racquets here and there. A bit ironically for these boards I think I can handle a lighter racquet now than I could before. Return of serve against hard hitters was always a concern so I liked a heavier racquet to stand up to that. I've improved in that respect now and like to take decent cuts at serves now when I can instead of just blocking back 1st serves. I also think I can control a more powerful racquet better now that I hit with more spin and am looking for more power from less work (than my Fischers) and probably a bit bigger and more forgiving headsize (than my C10 Pros). I still need to keep one eye on arm comfort though due to my 1HBH with full knowledge my form is not always perfect.
From your game style, age, and current stick, if you decide to go to a 100in2 topspin rip stick, then go with the X8 315. Even though they are both designed for heavy spin, you can flatten-out the ball with the X8 315 and have a lot of control and plow-thru.
On the other hand, from what you describe, I would suggest the London or the X10 295. They are both perfect transitions for a C10 Pro user. The lighter weights of these two sticks allows for faster racquet head acceleration, and the DC/X material adds crazy stability in-place of the C10 Pro's weight.
Regarding the X10 325: I am baffled that coming from a C10 Pro, that you found the X10 325 to be underpowered and dead. The C10 Pro does not hit a heavy ball, and the pop coming from the X10 325, was actually difficult for me to control. It is very crisp/quick; the dwell time is short. It plays like a more solid Roddick PDGT which can hit flat and can volley well with numerous volley techniques. Coming from the PB 10 Mid and now my London Tour--both of which hit a bigger and heavier ball than the C10 Pro--the only way that I could control the X10 325 was to add a lot of spin or take every ball on the rise, which is not how I play, or lead it up to mimic my mids--which I did--to increase the dwell time, as the lead makes the ball stay on the strings longer. I would argue that whatever string was in your demo was the problem.
All great choices and I tried all but the Prince. The Blx pro open is a great stick and the Becker DC Pro is great if your mostly a baselines. The BLX has a little more control and versatility.
I think I'm going to pass on the DC Pro unless I do two rounds of 4 from TW. I'm looking for more all court I think plus the swingweight scares me off. I can't think of a Wilson I've ever liked but am trying not to let that prejudice me against the Pro Open. In the past I've tended to favor Volkl and Prince with a little Babolat and PK thrown in. Haven't had much success with Wilson, Head or Dunlop.
Believe me I was shocked too re: the x10 325. That's why I stressed that I don't know with what or how tight it was strung. I know you have mentioned it strings up "crazy tight" so maybe it was simply strung too tight. It wasn't a demo but a another player who hits with us once in a while. I got to try it twice, once for just a little rallying one on one and then another time for about 4 games...but of doubles. So with a different set up the power may be there but I'm pretty confident I want to go in a lighter more powerful direction.
Ever since I bought a Becker 11 MP off of Jack I've been fond of Volkls. I even remember liking the V1 and Becker Pro of about 3 years ago when I demoed about 15 racquets. A little while ago I would've said the x8 315 looks to be perfect, more power, bit lighter and a bit larger head. But while I definitely want to try it I want to try some even lighter stuff too...a few things very different than what I have now just to see how a more radical change will work for me. Maybe even the PB7 you mentioned!
The DC Pro does all court very well - it's not just a baseline blaster.I think I'm going to pass on the DC Pro unless I do two rounds of 4 from TW. I'm looking for more all court I think plus the swingweight scares me off. I can't think of a Wilson I've ever liked but am trying not to let that prejudice me against the Pro Open. In the past I've tended to favor Volkl and Prince with a little Babolat and PK thrown in. Haven't had much success with Wilson, Head or Dunlop.
In my opinion, it's better DC Pro
Yesterday I tried IG Instinct and.....I have no feel!
it was deaf, it's impossible to feel the contact with the ball, I could not realize which type oh shot would go out from strings.
I loved DC Pro, in my opinon this is a great frame!
I have just to decide which string is better on it
What are you talking about? It's 327. It's an easy racquet to get moving and that SW puts mass behind the ball resulting in big-time power and spin.DC pro has way too high of swingweight.
What are you talking about? It's 327. It's an easy racquet to get moving and that SW puts mass behind the ball resulting in big-time power and spin.
Have you even played with the DC Pro?
I agree. The sw is not bad at all at around 325. Right in the middle of the spectrum
JackB1 said:this is a great all around racquet that does everything well. It's got a nice blend of power & control and a muted, dampened feel on impact that belies it's high stiffness rating. This one should have a large audience, especially those that want a semi-player's racquet with a lower swingweight..
OK, I am now trying to decide between the Becker Pro and the Wilson BLX Pro Open. I can use either one effectively and both suit my game well. The Becker has a swingweight of 319 and the BLX Open is 322. The Becker feels more polarized, whereas the Open feels more equally weighted throughout the racquet. The Becker may be more of a pure baseliners stick and the Open may be more well rounded for doubles or all-court play.
It's a tough decision! I will play with both for a while and just see which gives me better results on court.
You said that about the IG Instinct - have you put it aside now?
If so, was it the low swingweight that wasn't producing a heavy ball?
And when you say semi-players I reckon I understand what you mean - that it's not too exacting and yet it's not trainer wheels either!
I am wanting to try the IG Instinct.
I am in that frame of mind where I have lost a few matches recently and I want a little more oomph (I am using Wilson kTour cut down to standard length). Darn I am going to pull the pin and get the Instinct in. Bit worried about that low swingweight but am looking fwd to 100 sq in stringbed...
Last q: why the BLX Pro Open over the Instinct exactly?
the ktour is a pretty powerful racquet. my problem with the k factor series is lack of feel and control. the previous model h tour is so much smoother swinging and more controlled I almost never hit the k tour unless I break a string and have to.
something is just wrong with wilson n code and k factor racquets. I haven't hit with the blx yet, but I'm kinda a frustrated with wilson's lack of quality right now so screw them.
What are you talking about? It's 327. It's an easy racquet to get moving and that SW puts mass behind the ball resulting in big-time power and spin.
Have you even played with the DC Pro?
OK, I am now trying to decide between the Becker Pro and the Wilson BLX Pro Open. I can use either one effectively and both suit my game well. The Becker has a swingweight of 319 and the BLX Open is 322. The Becker feels more polarized, whereas the Open feels more equally weighted throughout the racquet. The Becker may be more of a pure baseliners stick and the Open may be more well rounded for doubles or all-court play.
It's a tough decision! I will play with both for a while and just see which gives me better results on court.
You said that about the IG Instinct - have you put it aside now?
If so, was it the low swingweight that wasn't producing a heavy ball?
And when you say semi-players I reckon I understand what you mean - that it's not too exacting and yet it's not trainer wheels either!
I am wanting to try the IG Instinct.
I am in that frame of mind where I have lost a few matches recently and I want a little more oomph (I am using Wilson kTour cut down to standard length). Darn I am going to pull the pin and get the Instinct in. Bit worried about that low swingweight but am looking fwd to 100 sq in stringbed...
Last q: why the BLX Pro Open over the Instinct exactly?
Come'on Jack! It's been weeks already! I want to see your new avatar!
no i have not. but 327 seem high to me. i like 315-320 much better. and yes i do work out in the gym and have some muscles. i just think SW of 330 or higher is way too high for fast paced doubles.
There's a BLX Pro Open on the first page of the "Graveyard" section. No Londons or Becker Pros but a BLX Pro Open. That can only mean one thing . . .
Joking aside, the pluses of the Wilson would be the pallet shape, 16x19 pattern, and for you, the crisper response. But what is your arm telling you to do? I loved the K-Blade and hit it for a year, but my arm didn't thank me for it. Although, I did play too much that year in late Winter, early Spring cold, which may have been more to blame than the frame.
Not selling any BLXs just yet
Both the Wilson and the Becker are the
same stiffness level...firm and not stiff.
The Becker has a impact feeling that reminds me
of the London a little bit but with less cupping feel
and slightly crisper.
DC pro has way too high of swingweight.
But the DCPro's swingweight isn't 330 or higher. You are stating the racquet has "way too high of swingweight", but using your own data, the racquet doesn't even fit the criteria which you set.327 seem high to me. i like 315-320 much better. and yes i do work out in the gym and have some muscles. i just think SW of 330 or higher is way too high for fast paced doubles.
But the DCPro's swingweight isn't 330 or higher. You are stating the racquet has "way too high of swingweight", but using your own data, the racquet doesn't even fit the criteria which you set.
Are you high on something?
I found that I do better with more swingweight and plow. The Instinct is very light and whippy feeling and I figured out I don't do so well with those type of sticks. The Becker DC Pro and the BLX Pro Open are tweeters but they have enough swingweight to allow me to swing normally and enough power to keep the ball deep and have some pop in reserve for when its needed. So far the Becker DC Pro is working out pretty good. I am 3-0 with it and it kind of reminds me of the London but easier to use and better from the baseline.