getting caught?Sounds unintentional to me.
getting caught?Sounds unintentional to me.
WADA in Polish means FLAWThe head of WADA (Witold Bańka) is Polish by the way.
The head of WADA (Witold Bańka) is Polish by the way.
Yawn.Unacceptable doping allegation. Reported.
Of course it is, but in the infantile world of today's sports fandom, there's just no way other top tennis players in 2024--with the state of sports medicine being what it is--could be using PEDs. If Halep, and now Swiatek have been caught, its not a stretch to hypothesize that top male players such as Alcaraz are also using.It is very fair to ask the question at this point.
Yawn.
Of course it is, but in the infantile world of today's sports fandom, there's just no way other top tennis players in 2024--with the state of sports medicine being what it is--could be using PEDs. If Halep, and now Swiatek have been caught, its not a stretch to hypothesize that top male players such as Alcaraz are also using.
The authorities. We were very close to having the number one player in both leagues banned for years.
They clearly don't want to do that. It would destroy tennis.
They would not care about any of them if they were replaced. No current player not named Djokovic is some transcendent star / known to the general public (and its partially questionable with Djokovic, too). None are household names or the subjects of "must see" sports during the year.Tennis would be just fine. Alcaraz is the biggest thing in the game right now and there are tons of good players the fans want to see.
Sinner is just an emotionless baseline robot out there…he could be replaced by anyone and most wouldn’t care.
They would not care about any of them if they were replaced. No current player not named Djokovic is some transcendent star / known to the general public (and its partially questionable with Djokovic, too). None are household names or the subjects of "must see" sports during the year.
They then wouldn't be able to do the same thing for Carlos the Shepherd if he gets caught doping.Tennis would be just fine. Alcaraz is the biggest thing in the game right now and there are tons of good players the fans want to see.
Sinner is just an emotionless baseline robot out there…he could be replaced by anyone and most wouldn’t care.
Exactly.ITIA should be under investigation now.
I think that they've damaged tennis' reputation much more by giving them such lenient treatment and applying such double standards compared to other players.The authorities. We were very close to having the number one player in both leagues banned for years.
They clearly don't want to do that. It would destroy tennis.
uh oh, here we go now.
I find a lot of people who don't look smart or don't look sophisticated and just think simple are the ones who can be trusted and not afraid of speaking about injustice. (i.e., the grassroot people)The usual Shapovalov who speaks out of turn.
Then one wonders how such a talent is throwing his career in the garbage, with this brain he has he is absolutely coherent.
He and Kyrgios invoke justicialism when together they don't match the IQ of a normal person.
No, the problem is that profiles like Shapovalov and Kyrgios read the headlines of various news and judge without informing themselves, ergo, they speak out of turn without knowing.I find a lot of people who don't look smart or don't look sophisticated and just think simple are the ones who can be trusted and not afraid of speaking about injustice. (i.e., the grassroot people)
People who look sophisticated, who belong in the top elite circle, who speak smartly, or look smart are the ones who often can't be trusted. (i.e., politicians and elite corrupt people, tycoon, dictator, etc)
Another garbage excuse from a doping tennis player and the morons at the ITIA ate it up. Hopefully WADA appeals this decision as well.
Sharapova was just voted into the Hall of Fame, so guess they don't really care about PEDs.Does this mean Swiatek and Sinner won’t be voted into the Tennis Hall of Fame just like Barry Bonds doesn’t get voted into the baseball HOF.
Unlike, for example, a Ruud who first documented himself on the Sinner case by reading all the papers of the first instance sentence of the independent tribunal, and only later had his say on the matter.
A pretty different situation with Sharapova. She took meldonium for a long time, it was added to the list of banned substances on 1 January 2016, and she tested positive at the 2016 Australian Open. Sharapova called a press conference in March 2016 to announce that she was would not be playing Indian Wells and to announce the news about her positive test. She got an initial 2 year ban for that, reduced to 15 months on appeal. Swiatek and Sinner have had kid gloves treatment by comparison. Was it because Sharapova still represented Russia, and hadn't switched to the USA?Sharapova was just voted into the Hall of Fame, so guess they don't really care about PEDs.
ITIA's decision was wrong according to the rule.No, the problem is that profiles like Shapovalov and Kyrgios read the headlines of various news and judge without informing themselves, ergo, they speak out of turn without knowing.
Unlike, for example, a Ruud who first documented himself on the Sinner case by reading all the papers of the first instance sentence of the independent tribunal, and only later had his say on the matter.
Yeah, a cheater is always a cheater.A player that waves her arms on court is caught doping? Shocking!
Some of the "excuses" are true. See Coria (nandrolone in multi-vitamin without it being listed on the label) and Canas (given medicine with a banned substance on the court in Acapulco by an ATP trainer).ITIA's decision was wrong according to the rule.
I support Shapo and Kyrgios for voicing their concerns about double standards in tennis.
I never support people who are tested positive in doping and I don't believe in any excuses they made.
Exactly. Shame on ITIA.I think that they've damaged tennis' reputation much more by giving them such lenient treatment and applying such double standards compared to other players.
That about covers it all.Sharapova was just voted into the Hall of Fame, so guess they don't really care about PEDs.
Because WTA needs money.How is Sharapova banned for 2 years but Iga is let off with a slap on the wrist?
![]()
What is trimetazidine, the drug at center of Valieva's doping drama?
Trimetazidine, known as TMZ, is a drug used to treat angina and other heart-related conditions. Why is it banned in sports?www.nbcolympics.com
I mean, if it takes place starting in the next week or so it might eat into the warm up wta events in Aus.After her time is served, I'm sure everyone here will be decent about the whole thing.
Seriously though, what the hell is a one month ban supposed to be? Does the ban at least take effect in January, or is she being banned from... Exhibitions?
I mean, if it takes place starting in the next week or so it might eat into the warm up wta events in Aus.
Yep, because they are not afraid to be themselves and don't hide anything cause they don't care what you think.I find a lot of people who don't look smart or don't look sophisticated and just think simple are the ones who can be trusted and not afraid of speaking about injustice. (i.e., the grassroot people)
People who look sophisticated, who belong in the top elite circle, who speak smartly, or look smart are the ones who often can't be trusted. (i.e., politicians and elite corrupt people, tycoon, dictator, etc)
It's called doping, not contamination. You lack skepticism and critical thinking if you simply believe their ad hoc excuses of contamination. No matter how small the dosis is, it's always more likely the result of intentional doping than of a supposed contamination.We will see if some more have the basic decency to at least read the ITIA report and to try to process it. Maybe somebody has learned a least that after floods of embarrassing posts after the Sinner case.
Some time ago I wrote that contamination is becoming an ever bigger problem for professional athletes as there is a very simple formula: more of more sensitive tests of more substances will result in far more false positives in the sense of doping. In short the great development of making doping more difficult will naturally also taint more players innocent of it.
Sharapova represented Russia.How is Sharapova banned for 2 years but Iga is let off with a slap on the wrist?
![]()
She will miss nothing. She has only 8 days left to serve. WADA needs to appeal this decision to CAS…
While the goal of destroying Russia is laudable taking down a Floridian tennis player is not a rational way to approach it.Sharapova represented Russia.