I would think that’s because the Men’s final was on at the same time as the NFL gamesI know this forum is heavily skewed towards men's tennis but Raducanu (& Leylah to an extent) really took the internet by storm over the last 2 weeks......even in US, Women's final between 2 teenagers (who are not even from US and were not even in top50) had better ratings than Men's final where one of the top2 greatest players of all time was going for his calendar slam & all time GS record against No2 ranked player in the world.
Women's final was also clashed with College Football which also attracts huge numbers on TV. On Thursday, Women's Semifinals clashed with NFL opening game of season(which did involve Cowboys and Brady) and it drew around 1.45M. On Friday, when there was no NFL and basically no College Football (other than couple of games), Men's Semi Finals attracted around 1.75M.I would think that’s because the Men’s final was on at the same time as the NFL games
you better shut your phuck upWomen's final was also clashed with College Football which also attracts huge numbers on TV. On Thursday, Women's Semifinals clashed with NFL opening game of season(which did involve Cowboys and Brady) and it drew around 1.45M. On Friday, when there was no NFL and basically no College Football (other than couple of games), Men's Semi Finals attracted around 1.75M.
Considering, one of the top2 greatest players of all time is going for such historical records, it's kinda unexpected that a Women's final involving 2 players ranked outside top50 who aren't even Americans have drawn better ratings. This is not a first time though. Even in some of recent years, Women's finals did draw better ratings than Men's finals in US. Even last year, Women's final had better ratings than Men's final.
Congrats to you, the OP and every other big WTA fan out there. This must be big day for you guys. CongratsHA. Where are all those trolls who said the viewership for the men's final for history would be way higher and I said the WTA had the best final?
Vindicated.
That's only Channel4 viewership which obtained the rights on the morning of the final...if you include Prime Viewership, it would be much higher.Also, in the U.K the Raducanu/Fernandez final hit 9.2 million viewers. Yes, 9.2 million.
.
OP Pls explain why men’s semi final had a higher draw with the same Djokovic?
finals- once they know the dishwasher was dominating, people would have moved on. There is no motivation to see Medvedev win because he has no personality or attractive game.
Has to be. Zedzilla is DA MAN thenBecause of Zverev, obviously. He's extremely popular.
Men's Semifinal wasn't going up against anything...not even College Football (most of College football games happen on Saturday) whereas Women's semifinal was directly clashing with NFL's opening game of the season which is like one of the top10 sporting games (ratings wise) in US in the entire year. Still, it did draw 1.45M, whereas Men's SF drew 1.75M. This is not the first time women's finals had better ratings. Women's finals had better ratings than Men's finals in last 3 years but atleast those involved Serena, Naomi. This was a final between 2 teenagers ranked outside top50 whereas Novak was going for tennis history against No2 player in the world.OP Pls explain why men’s semi final had a higher draw with the same Djokovic?
finals- once they know the dishwasher was dominating, people would have moved on. There is no motivation to see Medvedev win because he has no personality or attractive game.
HA. Where are all those trolls who said the viewership for the men's final for history would be way higher and I said the WTA had the best final?
Vindicated.
If this continues? Yes.They should pay the women more than the men.
If it was Federer or Nadal in the final the ATP would have won easily. But Djokovic is not a draw at all for mainstream folks. Most have never heard of him.
Not sure how this is the WTA's fault that both ladies were from big nations? Doesn't that just show the failings on the men's side that no American, British or Canadian men are making slam finals? The men's final wasn't available for you for free because the broadcasters knew it wouldn't rate well so didn't bother paying and promoting it but knew the women's would be box office and it was. It's like here in Australia, the Wimbledon final was hugely promoted as Barty was in the final, Djokovic/Berrettini final did not draw the same hype.Also viewership for this paticular final had a bonus because it was two young girls from big sporting countries and also the WTA final was streamed on a British TV channel here (Channel 4) which is avalible to anyone and the Men's final? No such luck. I had to resort to paid amazon prime to watch it. It wasn't on normal tv, so that CLEARLY had an impact on viewing figures here.
Novak is servian. and americans don't pay much attention to tennis anyway. i will bet if Isner or Tiafoe was playing in the final,,, men's final would have been much more attention getting![]()
Case closed![]()
OP will continue to watch WTA all his life .... LOLOk then. How about making the ATP and WTA seperate tours then hm? Instead of having each slam and event be played at the same time with both men/women. Let's see if having 2 completely seperate weeks for each event has the same viewing figures for all rounds, not just a final.
Also viewership for this paticular final had a bonus because it was two young girls from big sporting countries and also the WTA final was streamed on a British TV channel here (Channel 4) which is avalible to anyone and the Men's final? No such luck. I had to resort to paid amazon prime to watch it. It wasn't on normal tv, so that CLEARLY had an impact on viewing figures here.
Novak is servian. and americans don't pay much attention to tennis anyway. i will bet if Isner or Tiafoe was playing in the final,,, men's final would have been much more attention getting
Not sure how this is the WTA's fault that both ladies were from big nations? Doesn't that just show the failings on the men's side that no American, British or Canadian men are making slam finals? The men's final wasn't available for you for free because the broadcasters knew it wouldn't rate well so didn't bother paying and promoting it but knew the women's would be box office and it was. It's like here in Australia, the Wimbledon final was hugely promoted as Barty was in the final, Djokovic/Berrettini final did not draw the same hype.
here in US, you have to pay to watch ESPN. It's not free to air. USopen used to be carried by CBS. But no free to air channels carry tennis anymore. Infact ESPN dropped French open from their roster . Noody even wants to watch french open anymore. There is one particular player who single handedly managed to kill it.
![]()
Case closed![]()
the men's final goes up against non-cable NFL games (the most popular sport in the US by a wide margin).HA. Where are all those trolls who said the viewership for the men's final for history would be way higher and I said the WTA had the best final?
Vindicated.
Every men's final held on a Sunday for the past 55 years has been played during NFL games.I would think that’s because the Men’s final was on at the same time as the NFL games
Count Raducu seems to have many fans excited. Let’s hope she can win a 250 now.
and yet here we have you making 98% of threads/posts about Djokovic...the only time you mentioned Raducanu is when comparing her to Djokovic![]()
Case closed![]()
Not just no American women...it also only had just 1 top15 player in Semifinalists who isn't even that popular and couple of teenagers whereas Men's Semifinal lineup included all 3 pre-tournament favs + storyline of Novak going for history. This is also first time in ages where there wasn't an American Woman in QF. Women's Semifinals was also up against NFL opening game of season which had like 20M+ viewers whereas Men's Semifinals didn't really have any competition on Friday. Considering all this, Women's SF still drew 1.45M whereas Men's SF drew 1.75M. I expect Men's ratings to increase in next few years though once the current young American men's tennis gen (which does look promising) can breakthrough into top10. Other than top stars, having promising local players really helps with tv ratings.Ben conveniently neglects the men’s ratings outpaced the women this year in the semifinals for the first time in the past 7 years.
It’s no coincidence this was the first time the women’s semifinals did not include an American woman. It’s typically included multiple American women, once all 4 semi finalists.
Always so snide about everything. He's become insufferable.Ben conveniently neglects the men’s ratings outpaced the women this year in the semifinals for the first time in the past 7 years.
It’s no coincidence this was the first time the women’s semifinals did not include an American woman. It’s typically included multiple American women, once all 4 semi finalists.
I recall using a similar excuse for why the women’s final at the Aus Open doesn’t do well against the men’s final e.g. Saturday v Sunday and yet I was ridiculed. Funny that. Also, the final outviewed in many other countries, not just the USthe men's final goes up against non-cable NFL games (the most popular sport in the US by a wide margin).
![]()
Case closed![]()
It's great people tuned in to watch her play. Unfortunately, many of these same people will not watch another tennis match until Wimbledon.
And over the last 55 years the NFL has only gotten astronomically more popular each decade while tennis has been declining.Every men's final held on a Sunday for the past 55 years has been played during NFL games.
WTA>ATPHA. Where are all those trolls who said the viewership for the men's final for history would be way higher and I said the WTA had the best final?
Vindicated.