Amen786
Semi-Pro
I never said banHe didn't say homie IIRC, he said a more controversial word that nevertheless doesn't deserve a ban.
I never said banHe didn't say homie IIRC, he said a more controversial word that nevertheless doesn't deserve a ban.
This proves it. Federer is GOAT. Debate is over.I know Djokovic's run this year was the most dramatic because he took it down to the very last match out of the 28 grand slam matches needed to achieve the CYGS, but he fell 3 sets short of what was needed. Federer, actually came closer to Novak's '21 run twice. In fact, Novak was closer in '15 than this year.
Here is the breakdown of how the Big 3 have fared in getting the necessary sets required to win all four GS:
Federer:
2006: -2 sets required
2007: -2 sets required
Djokovic
2015: -2 sets required
2021: -3 sets required
Nadal:
2010: -9 sets required
2019: -7 sets required
Peak Fed would have destroyed this version of Medvedev. Djokovic to be honest wasn't playing best all the year. He was winning cos the inability of NextGen to hold their nerves under pressure.Even as a huge Federer fan this is a giant over reach. Novak let the moment get to him and had less left in the tank than we all thought, but even two sets down he had better odds of beating Medvedev than Fed ever had of beating Rafa in ‘06 or ‘07 at RG. Heck, give me this version of Novak down 2 sets vs Medvedev over any version of Fed up two sets vs ‘06 or ‘07 Rafa at RG. That’s actually still easy money, you’d have to give Fed 3 or 4 games and a break point in the final set against this year’s Nadal for 50/50 odds.
Add 2009 to it as he one set away in both AO and USO Final.Federer was definitely closer.
Its why i do not think Djokovic wins a slam again. When he realises what a golden chamce he had at both Olympics and Uso to make history i really think it will break himAdd 2009 to it as he one set away in both AO and USO Final.
Djokovic had cakewalk draws till SFs this year but his performance proved that he wasn't that good against a deflated field to win CYGS
Good lord, so many likes for an OP so devoid of logic. What I just said is staring you in the face in the data you have yourself compiled and yet you claim Fed got closer to the CYGS than Novak TWICE.I know Djokovic's run this year was the most dramatic because he took it down to the very last match out of the 28 grand slam matches needed to achieve the CYGS, but he fell 3 sets short of what was needed. Federer, actually came closer to Novak's '21 run twice. In fact, Novak was closer in '15 than this year.
Here is the breakdown of how the Big 3 have fared in getting the necessary sets required to win all four GS:
Federer:
2006: -2 sets required
2007: -2 sets required
Djokovic
2015: -2 sets required
2021: -3 sets required
Nadal:
2010: -9 sets required
2019: -7 sets required
Bunny Roddick took him to four at the USO. With CYGS pressure, could well turn into a Roddick victory.Assuming he wins the FO and Wimbledon without Nadal which he probably would have... He would be going for 6 in a row at the USO along with the CYGS.. Pressure would be immense but then again his biggest competition on Hard courts then was his bunny Roddick so you are probably right.
LOLI know Djokovic's run this year was the most dramatic because he took it down to the very last match out of the 28 grand slam matches needed to achieve the CYGS, but he fell 3 sets short of what was needed. Federer, actually came closer to Novak's '21 run twice. In fact, Novak was closer in '15 than this year.
Here is the breakdown of how the Big 3 have fared in getting the necessary sets required to win all four GS:
Federer:
2006: -2 sets required
2007: -2 sets required
Djokovic
2015: -2 sets required
2021: -3 sets required
Nadal:
2010: -9 sets required
2019: -7 sets required
This wrestling & wwe spam on the other hand though, need to be deleted as soon as posted, michal.
Not everyone watches those staged craps & get context.
As @Rosstour said, this is a tennis forum, not wrestling.
No. I can't love fake things.You better learn to love it bestie
No. I can't love fake things.
And thank you for terming me bestie after whatever happened some days ago. You're a very good person.
اللہ آپ کو خوشیوں سے نوازے۔
You're a food lover. So you'll love thisI'm a good Christian boy, you are most certainly forgiven
Domi looks the most like it. Really seems to be done after winning a slam. He looks like he will wind up even more of a one slam wonder than Delpo, like the kind of player who will later make you wonder how he even won that one slam. Sissy and Zed are presently slamless wonders so nothing to comment. Med looks good for another at minimum.which one of these players are one slam wonder like delpotro
med
theim
tsipisas
zeverv
add of your own
Coming close to CYGS means you won the first 3 slams in the first place lol.
It's possible Federer actually felt the RG final was the defacto CYGS match, which could explain why he seemed so nervous after the 1st set of the 2006 final.Nah, he never did. Novak was stopped near the finishing line, Fed never even got to that point.
Fed was close in 2006 though, would bet good money on him winning CYGS if he had won FO that year (and the gap between him and Nadal on clay wasn't as big compared to other years).
What a poor lie and defence after being caught out for open racism. "I'm black homie". No way I'm believing this.
I thought you were a good poster from whatever interactions we had in last 2 weeks or so.
but seriously, this is a SHAME...
I HOPE ALLAH GRANTS YOU WITH NON RACIST MENTALITY.
It's possible Federer actually felt the RG final was the defacto CYGS match, which could explain why he seemed so nervous after the 1st set of the 2006 final.
Peak Fed would have destroyed this version of Medvedev. Djokovic to be honest wasn't playing best all the year. He was winning cos the inability of NextGen to hold their nerves under pressure.
Djokovic got exhausted because of his own game style. Fed never used to win in those grinding fashion. And if he were in djokovics position he could have easily beaten any Next Gen final ..providing that 33-34 yr old Federer Peakovic a run for his money in 2015. Guess what Federer played over 150 matches in the tour with 2014-15 combined.
Pretty sure he did, he was also coached by Roche in those years who probably told him many first hand stories about Laver. Fed was gunning for CYGS in 2006, no doubt in my mind.
@MichaelNadal has already forgove me for that. Because I wasn't acknowledged about it & didn't know him much.What, he's racist against himself
And MN posted his picture (even video) many times on the forum, don't play dumb.
He beat djoker 3 times on HC and performed way better than 34 year old djoker in 2015 open. He thrashed peak Stan in straight sets in USO.Fed gave 2015 Peakovic a run for his money on faster surfaces, he lost to Seppi at AO and got smoked by his pigeon at the French. He wasn't even a contender on slower surfaces.
I know Djokovic's run this year was the most dramatic because he took it down to the very last match out of the 28 grand slam matches needed to achieve the CYGS, but he fell 3 sets short of what was needed. Federer, actually came closer to Novak's '21 run twice. In fact, Novak was closer in '15 than this year.
Here is the breakdown of how the Big 3 have fared in getting the necessary sets required to win all four GS:
Federer:
2006: -2 sets required
2007: -2 sets required
Djokovic
2015: -2 sets required
2021: -3 sets required
Nadal:
2010: -9 sets required
2019: -7 sets required
No, actually Djokovic is the only one that came close to that. Federer and Nadal failed before that last event took place )))
But it doesn't matter. At the end, none of them won CYGS.
)))