Interesting article: Henin faces tougher road than Clijsters

Augustus

Hall of Fame
Perrotta: Henin faces tougher road than Clijsters


The news we’ve all expected for weeks will soon become official: Justine Henin, the former world No. 1 and seven-time Grand Slam title winner, will return to professional tennis next season, according to two Belgian newspapers. An announcement is reportedly scheduled for Tuesday.

Henin recently congratulated fellow Belgian Kim Clijsters on her stunning comeback to the WTA tour, which netted a U.S. Open title after less than a month of competition. Henin, of course, was a better player than Clijsters, and so one might assume that her return to the top might take even less time, and bring her even more spoils.

Perhaps, but don’t be surprised if this Belgian finds her second act more difficult. While it’s true the competition at the top of today’s tour isn’t as strong as it was when Henin and Clijsters left the game, Henin’s tennis is not tailor made for instant success. To wit:


*She’s high style, but also high risk. Henin is the most versatile player of her generation: She hits the ball cleanly off both her forehand and backhand, slices well, snaps off crisp volleys, moves incredibly well, and even serves with power, no small feat for a woman her size (she is listed at a shade shorter than 5-foot-6, but in person seems closer to 5-foot-4). The problem is that Henin plays a bigger game than her body ought to permit. At her best, as she was when she defeated both Williams sisters on her way to the 2007 U.S. Open title, she took a lot of risks and received many rewards. But it took Henin a long time, and a lot of fine-tuning, to reach that point in her career, and there were many tournaments (the 2004 and 2005 U.S. Opens come to mind) when she pushed herself to her limit and didn’t produce the desired effect. Clijsters is a different sort of player. She’s a bigger, stronger athlete than Henin, and one always gets that sense that she’s playing within her limits, or even conservatively. Clijsters can win more matches by simply keep the ball in play. Henin plays tennis on the edge, and often that results in brilliance. The price she pays is having many more mediocre performances.

* She’s prone to injury. Henin always struggled to stay healthy, and that’s not going to get easier this time around. Next June she’ll turn 28, which is fast approaching “elderly” on the women’s tour. If she’s going to make a big splash, she’ll have to get in top shape, play just the right amount of tournaments, and remain healthy for at least six or seven months on her first attempt, because any serious setback would probably preclude her from making another go of it.

* Her confidence is easily shaken. Clijsters earned a reputation as a choker in her first stint on the tour, while Henin rightly became known as a champion. It was Henin, though, who seemed to expend more nervous energy on court and at times look physically ill when the last days of a tournament rolled around. She always stared at her coach, Carlos Rodriguez, in her box and generally seemed unconvinced of her ability to win. When I wrote a profile of Rodriguez for the June 2008 issue of TENNIS, the most striking thing Rodriguez said to me was this: “She doesn’t believe, even today.” Henin often lacked confidence, even after she reached the final of six out of the last eight majors she had played (she won three of them). If Henin’s comeback gets off to a rocky start, her doubts might quickly turn into surprising defeats.

Add to all this that the expectations will be much greater for Henin, especially now that Clijsters has made a return to tennis look so easy. Henin has as much talent as any player in the world, and an equal amount of determination. Tennis is a much better sport for her presence. Still, I’ll be surprised if she can carve up her former rivals as quickly, and as convincingly, as Clijsters did this summer.

Tom Perrotta is a senior editor at TENNIS magazine.


http://www.tennis.com/features/general/features.aspx?id=187096

Sorry if this has been posted before... I thought it was an interesting article, although I think Henin will be back on top at the end of 2010.
 
Last edited:

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
The article actually gets at one of the reasons Henin retired. She said that to be that good with her size disadvantage, it was exhausting. She had to be in tip-top shape to be able to generate the power she needed, it didn't come as naturally as it does to other players. The mental focus to execute her game to beat more naturally powerful players and the training took a lot out of her.

To her credit, she made it look incredibly easy. But, it was far from it, and it eventually wore her out.

That said, I think she'll be plenty successful upon her return. I don't think she'll absolutely dominate like some think, but she'll do very, very well.

Welcome back Justine.
 

Elegant_Roger

New User
I agree with the article. It seems like the women who rely on finesse are having a much tougher time out there nowadays. I am overjoyed she is back, and I would be happy to see her winning again, but I have a feeling her comeback is going to be more like the one by Martina Hingis. She will get back in the top 10, but I don't see her regaining #1 or doing as well as Kim.
 

World Beater

Hall of Fame
henin will prove that haters wrong.

in an era of dinara safina and ana ivanovic, jankovic...i think justine stands a chance
 

drwood

Professional
Article raises some good points, but I believe Henin will do better than Kim in their respective comebacks.

Good article. Henin will do very well, but she won't do as well as Clijsters -- I don't expect her to own Clijsters in majors as she did before they both retired.
 

NamRanger

G.O.A.T.
Good article. Henin will do very well, but she won't do as well as Clijsters -- I don't expect her to own Clijsters in majors as she did before they both retired.


It's a much weaker field. 80% Henin is fully capable of beating everyone short of Clijsters. Henin will easily dominate the clay season next year (as there is no clear dominant woman on that surface), and will have her chances at every other slam.



I actually think Henin will still beat Clijsters. Henin was simply a very bad match-up for Clijsters.
 

drwood

Professional
It's a much weaker field. 80% Henin is fully capable of beating everyone short of Clijsters. Henin will easily dominate the clay season next year (as there is no clear dominant woman on that surface), and will have her chances at every other slam.

I actually think Henin will still beat Clijsters. Henin was simply a very bad match-up for Clijsters.

Even prime Henin struggled with Kuznetsova on clay, so I don't think she'll just dominate everyone on clay (although I expect her to win the French next year).

Henin was only a bad matchup for Clijsters b/c Kim always choked in big occasions...Kim has always had the game to beat her, and now that Kim is playing more offensively and less retrieveresque than before (i.e. less sliding and splits and more flat offensive FHs), plus a Slam for her confidence, I don't expect her to routinely choke against Henin as she did prior to their retirements.

I think this is also great news for Safina. Now no one will be talking about her, and she'll be able to sneak up on people again, just like in 2008.
 

elquien

New User
I have read it many times before:

Everyone gets nervous. What is important is how you handle it.

I would add that some people like Henin and even Graff (who would speed up and and get more annoyed with her sorroundings) show it but generally perform the same or better unders stress. Although they do not always win.

Look at Safina. I think she is like a robot and her mannerisms do not show her nerves. But but her performace sucks in pressure moments. Her outbursts are just as likely to show up when she is playing well or poorly.

I do not care for Henin's persona or questionable tennis etiquete. But I love to watch her play so I hope she does well.

I thinks she will do extremely well against the mental cases today. Add Serena and Venus to that bunch.
 
Last edited:
Even prime Henin struggled with Kuznetsova on clay, so I don't think she'll just dominate everyone on clay (although I expect her to win the French next year).

Henin was only a bad matchup for Clijsters b/c Kim always choked in big occasions...Kim has always had the game to beat her, and now that Kim is playing more offensively and less retrieveresque than before (i.e. less sliding and splits and more flat offensive FHs), plus a Slam for her confidence, I don't expect her to routinely choke against Henin as she did prior to their retirements.

I think this is also great news for Safina. Now no one will be talking about her, and she'll be able to sneak up on people again, just like in 2008.

Even without the choking Henin was and is a better overall player than Clijsters. The mental edge Henin had was part of her dominance over Clijsters, but a superior game was also part of it. It is not like Clijsters would have won most of their matches from spring 2003 onwards without choking.
 

drwood

Professional
Even without the choking Henin was

Definitely true

and is a better overall player than Clijsters.

We'll see

The mental edge Henin had was part of her dominance over Clijsters, but a superior game was also part of it. It is not like Clijsters would have won most of their matches from spring 2003 onwards without choking.

We'll soon find out.

Would be interesting if they met in 1st rd of Australian :).
 
Good article. Henin will do very well, but she won't do as well as Clijsters -- I don't expect her to own Clijsters in majors as she did before they both retired.

Justine is twice the player Clijsters is, and totally owned her. Your logic doesn't make sence.
 

drwood

Professional
Justine is twice the player Clijsters is, and totally owned her. Your logic doesn't make sence.

Justine WAS twice the player Clijsters WAS...that's definitely true (although even then, the H2H was very close -- only 12-10 to Henin). We simply don't know what will happen next year.

Serena and Venus both owned Clijsters before she retired, yet Clijsters has handled both of them since returning to the game.

Bottom line: You don't know yet how Henin will do against Clijsters in 2010. Is she the favorite? Absolutely (5-2 H2H in slam meetings). But people are making it sound like its a gimmie, when that thinking couldn't be further from the truth.
 

rocket

Hall of Fame
Clijsters can win more matches by simply keep the ball in play. Henin plays tennis on the edge, and often that results in brilliance. The price she pays is having many more mediocre performances.

Prior to Clijsters' comeback, Clijsters: 1 slam - Henin: 7 slams.

If "mediocre performances" meant she lost in slam finals...
 

flying24

Banned
Serena and Venus both owned Clijsters before she retired, yet Clijsters has handled both of them since returning to the game.

Flawed reasoning. First of all Clijsters barely played Venus and Serena before when Clijsters was in her prime from late 2002-2005. During that time she played both Williams very even. In late 2002-2003 Kim played Serena 3 times and won easily once, lost easily once, and lost one nailbiter were she should have won (up 5-1 in the 3rd set). Venus and Kim were 3-3 from late 2002-2005. So Venus and Serena did not own prime Kim, they played her a limited enough times to keep their lopsided head to heads. Similar to how Venus was able to keep a somewhat bogus 7-2 head to head edge over Henin by playing Henin only once after January 2003.

Secondly Serena and Venus are not anywhere near as good as they were back then. Venus especialy could have already won her final slam title and is a shadow of the player she was from 2000-2005. Serena is nowhere near as good as she was from 1999-2003 either. She has been riding off the wave of a very weak womens field ever since Henin and Clijsters retired, Maria went down with injuries, Venus aged out of contention on non grass surfaces, and basically anyone good outside of Serena went out the door replaced by mediocre headcases who arent very talented to begin with.
 

bluetrain4

G.O.A.T.
I'm not ready to give Clijsters automatic wins over Serena. Sure, Serena isn't as good as she was and Clijsters should do better against her than previously (as she's already shown)

But, I still say Serena beats her in plenty of their matchups. She didn't even play that well at the USO (the serve was terrible) and she was still in both sets.

Again, I think Kim will definitely do much better and beat Serena more, but Serena will still win a lot of their matchups. People, of course, want Clijsters to win more because they like her more, but likability doesn't always mean she'll win.
 
I'm not ready to give Clijsters automatic wins over Serena. Sure, Serena isn't as good as she was and Clijsters should do better against her than previously (as she's already shown)

But, I still say Serena beats her in plenty of their matchups. She didn't even play that well at the USO (the serve was terrible) and she was still in both sets.

Again, I think Kim will definitely do much better and beat Serena more, but Serena will still win a lot of their matchups. People, of course, want Clijsters to win more because they like her more, but likability doesn't always mean she'll win.

Clijsters will be better than she was at the U.S Open in the future too. It was only her 3rd tournament in nearly 3 years remember. You really think that was already the highest level she will reach, LOL! Serena will never look her presumed best against a quality opponent since she isnt nearly as good a player as she used to be, and with her arrogance and the U.S media overhype of her most people have some phantom best of her in their minds which doesnt even exist in reality.

You and others seem almost oblivious to how flat out lucky Serena has been the last 2 years. She isnt that good anymore and the only reason she has won anything is because Justine retired and the rest of the field left sucks today. That is it. Default hollow wins which should be devalued to almost zero worth, and which to many already are. She hasnt won a slam event since mid 2003 with Justine even in the field. If she continues to play the same level she played at the last 2 years and Justine also returns to her old form, Kim as expected improves, and anyone of the up and comers prove to be decent Serena will probably never win another slam. She has coasted off weak competition or key absences to win anything she has won in the last several years.
 
Last edited:
Justine WAS twice the player Clijsters WAS...that's definitely true (although even then, the H2H was very close -- only 12-10 to Henin). We simply don't know what will happen next year.

Serena and Venus both owned Clijsters before she retired, yet Clijsters has handled both of them since returning to the game.

Bottom line: You don't know yet how Henin will do against Clijsters in 2010. Is she the favorite? Absolutely (5-2 H2H in slam meetings). But people are making it sound like its a gimmie, when that thinking couldn't be further from the truth.

Venus' H2h record with Clijsters was 6-4 before the US Open. I don't consider that "owning" her.
 
if justine is rusty, i dont expect her to do well against clijsters, but we will see. maybe kim is good motivation for her to do good, who knows?
 

Riosfan

Banned
Another reason she retired - and this was written in a Brit paper with a source close to Henin - was she wanted to meet a man who liked her for her and not because of her tennis fame. DId she meet a new guy? Hopefully she did.
 
Top