Interesting article on success and popularity of Babolat

vlad101

New User
I thought I'd share this with everyone.

Buy It and Be Great

By JOE NOCERA
Published: August 19, 2007

“Psychology is very strong in tennis,” Eric Babolat was saying. He was speaking to me from France, where his family-owned company, Babolat, has its headquarters; at age 37, Eric is from the fifth generation of Babolats to run it.

How did Babolat become such a hot racket company so quickly? Luck, and some brilliant fantasy tennis.

True enough, psychology is important in any tennis match. But that's not really what Babolat was referring to. Rather, he was talking about the relationship between a player and his racket, how the right racket can bring to mind that line from “Sweeney Todd”: “At last, my right arm is complete!” And from a commercial point of view, he was talking about another kind of psychology, the kind that can cause a piece of sports equipment to become the “it” racket.

Eric should know. Though his company has been around since the dawn of modern tennis itself — his great-great-grandfather, who sold strings for musical instruments, created the first natural gut string in 1877 — it was only 13 years ago that his father, the late Pierre Babolat, made the decision to manufacture a racket. Six years later, in 2000, the company began selling its Pure Drive line of rackets in the United States.

In retrospect, this surely ranks as one of those Harvard Business School case-study moments. With the tennis industry in the dumps, and the racket business dominated by Head, Prince and Wilson, most people thought Pierre Babolat was nuts to get into rackets. Now he looks like a genius. From a standing start, the company has reached about 16 percent market share, and it is closing fast on Head. (Wilson is the leader, with just under 30 percent of the market, but it sells to big-box stores like WalMart, which Babolat refuses to do.) Since it introduced rackets, Babolat's revenue has more than tripled, to $117 million in 2006 sales. “They have taken tennis by storm,” says Mark Mason, the longtime proprietor of Mason's Tennis Mart in Manhattan. “I've never seen anything like it.”

If you play tennis, or even just watch the pros, you've surely noticed the Babolat phenomenon. The rackets are everywhere — at your local courts, and at this year's United States Open, where a huge number of players will be using them.

Babolat will tell you that its secret sauce is its patented Woofer technology, which it says keeps the ball on the strings a split-second longer, imparting a trampoline-like rebound. Others note the rackets' “good looks,” with their clean and distinctive colored lines (depending on the model). But if I were writing the Harvard case study, I would stress something else: pure dumb luck. Sometimes, as the old saying goes, it's better to be lucky than good.

Do you know about James Blake and Dunlop? Years ago, Blake began using Dunlop rackets, eventually signing an endorsement deal with the company. But in 2004 he had his annus horribilis — the broken neck, the death of his father, the shingles — and Dunlop dropped him. The following year, when Blake staged his remarkable resurgence, he signed with Prince. The problem was that Blake could never get comfortable with his Prince racket. There were even rumors that Blake was painting Dunlop rackets to make them look like Prince rackets. Finally, this past May, psychology won: he officially returned to Dunlop.

The moral of the story should be obvious: when a player finds a “stick” he really likes, he is loath to switch — even when someone will pay him millions to do so. For racket companies, there is another moral: the earlier you can get your racket into the hands of young, promising players, the more likely they are to keep using it as they rise through the ranks.

Each of the four big racket manufacturers, including Babolat, has a grass-roots program for getting promising juniors to use its rackets. Golf and ski companies have their own junior programs, but only the elite of the elites get free equipment; in tennis, the companies compete to distribute rackets to not only the top 20 juniors in every country, who usually get them free, but the top 100, who can buy rackets at a reduced price.

Why? Because tennis marketers are convinced that when people watch good players, they want to try their rackets. “A player who is ranked 80th nationally could be the best player in some city or some big tennis club,” says Max Brownlee, who started up Babolat's United States operation in 2000. And when juniors see higher-ranked juniors using a racket, they often want to try it, to see if it raises their game as well.

Most juniors eventually flame out, but some turn pro — and thus create another marketing opportunity. While companies build ad campaigns around top players like Andre Agassi (Head) or Roger Federer (Wilson), club players also notice what racket their favorite player is using and often buy an amateur version of it. (The pros' rackets are rarely identical to those sold at retail; pros usually customize their rackets.) Which brings us back to Babolat.

Babolat came to the racket business with a big advantage: it had a lock on the market for natural gut strings, which are what most serious players want to use. Babolat strings are in such demand that the company has never needed to offer endorsement deals and has given them away only in the rarest of circumstances. (Pete Sampras was one of the few players who received free strings.) So when Babolat started its grass-roots program, it had the lure of free or reduced-price strings to get juniors to use its rackets.

And it had luck. In 1999, a year before Babolat came to the United States and began signing up juniors, a Babolat executive named Luca Appino started talking to a tennis coach named Tarik Benhabiles about having his 17-year-old player use Babolat. Appino, who no longer works for the company, and Benhabiles, who no longer coaches the player, were old friends. At the time, the only pro using Babolat was the Spaniard Carlos Moya, from Majorca. He was “a good-looking, flamboyant dude,” in the words of tennis agent Ken Meyerson, but not someone who was going to move a lot of product outside Europe.

Benhabiles's player was an American junior almost no one had heard of, Andy Roddick. “I didn't know much about him,” concedes Brownlee, who at the time was working for Prince. Back then, Roddick didn't have a big reputation; in 1999, he lost in the first round of two of the junior grand slam tournaments. Volkl was the only other company willing to give Roddick a racket, but he chose Babolat because of his coach's relationship with Appino.
 
"continued"


A year later everything changed. Roddick won three out of the four boys' majors and became the No. 1 junior in the world. Other juniors took notice, especially of his monster serve. Some actually phoned Babolat in France, to see if they too could get “Andy's racket.” “If he had been out there with a broomstick,” says Rick Macci, who coached Roddick between ages 9 and 14, “I think people would have wanted to try a broomstick.”

Over the next three years, Roddick was the hottest thing in tennis, an electrifying player with a crowd-pleasing personality. And — how blessed can Babolat be? — he was American. If you are going to sell rackets in America, you need an American star.

Needless to say, it wasn't long before Babolat was doing something it doesn't often do: paying Roddick to endorse its rackets. His agent, Meyerson, negotiated a small six-figure deal in 2000, shortly after Roddick turned pro, and then a much larger deal in 2003, right around the time Roddick won the United States Open. That deal nets him millions a year. Would Roddick have changed rackets had Babolat low-balled him? Probably not. But the company decided not to take that risk. A happy endorser is always better than a grouchy one.

Eric Babolat was running the company by then. His father, Pierre, had died in 1998, in a plane crash returning from the United States Open. Pierre got to see Carlos Moya win the French Open in 1998 with a Babolat racket, but he died well before Babolat took tennis by storm. “I regret the most for my father that he never got to see the success,” Eric Babolat says. “He was vindicated after his death.”

Roddick is still a hugely important endorser for Babolat, even as he has slipped in the rankings and Federer and Rafael Nadal have come to dominate the men's tour. He has a signature racket, called Pure Drive Roddick, which earns him royalties. When Eric Babolat decided to get into the highly competitive tennis shoe business a few years ago, he quickly got Roddick to agree to wear the shoes and signed him up as an endorser. Today, if you go to the Babolat display in any tennis store in the United States, you'll see ads for Roddick and his racket and shoes.

But you'll also see ads for someone else: Rafael Nadal. And here you can only shake your head in wonder. Nadal was missed by the grass-roots programs of the big racket makers, yet wound up with Babolat.

Why? Because he comes from Majorca. His idol is none other than the original Babolat man, Carlos Moya. Is it any surprise, then, that Nadal would use the same racket as Moya? Not to anyone who markets tennis rackets.

Today, at age 21, Nadal is one of the great forces in tennis, the one true rival to Federer. The pace and spin with which he hits the ball generate the same kind of awe as Roddick's service. That in turn leads juniors — and lots of club players — to the Babolat Aeropro, which is Nadal's racket. Not long ago, Babolat locked up Nadal with a 10-year deal, for a multimillion-dollar sum that makes him among the top racket endorsers (obviously Roddick is in the same category).

Sales of the Babolat Aeropro, Brownlee told me, are 18 months ahead of projections. Then he let out a small chuckle and added, “What can you say?”

Harvard Business School couldn't have put it better.
 
very interesting and informative article.
sporting talent and giving them the trust they need.

and your flowers will bear fruits. hee
 
It really is all about sponsoring the right pros at the right time. This is the exact blueprint that Tecnifibre is following....Verdasco is their Moya; although I don't think Verdasco will bring TF into the limelight the way Moya did for Babolat in the 90's..
 
I'm struck by a paragraph in the article that includes the following sentences; '...the company has never needed to offer endorsement deals...' and '(Pete Sampras was one of the few players who received free strings)'. There were a lot of pros who were sporting the 2 line logo on their strings before Babolat started making racquets. I can also remember players who had the the 2 lines and a big 'VS' logo in their racquets--I don't think they did it just because it looked cool. A set of VS gut had a list of players who used their strings on the packaging (I still have some of those unopened packages). I played satellite circuits with players you never heard of who got free strings from Babolat. So, I don't believe the article is entirely accurate.
 
Last edited:
Like the article but Im missing something. With very very stiff racquets and nothing below 630 cm2 Babalot seems to have filled an empty hole left by other manufacturers. Could that be the other reason for their success ?
 
Like the article but Im missing something. With very very stiff racquets and nothing below 630 cm2 Babalot seems to have filled an empty hole left by other manufacturers. Could that be the other reason for their success ?

That's a very good point there. Babolat is 98-100" where as others were either 93-95 and then jumped to 105-110" in their racquet lineup. Babolat did fill the void and also racquets that are not too Player like nor too tweener like with the Pure Drive especially. I really liked Max Brownlee and his son and it's sad to see him go. Only time will tell which direction Babolat will be heading this year.
 
Nice article.

I still dont see the huge popularity (locally) though.

I tried several of the racquets and just cant seem to like them. In my area I only know of 2 people who use Babolat racquets male or female and absolutely zero of the pros at the 3 tennis facilities I play at use Babolats. I have taken drills from several of the club pros and asked them about racquets and they all unanimously hate Babolat because they are so stiff and pingy.

Wilson and head(for some unkown reason) seem to be the dominate racquets of choice in my area.
 
Nice article.

I still dont see the huge popularity (locally) though.

I tried several of the racquets and just cant seem to like them. In my area I only know of 2 people who use Babolat racquets male or female and absolutely zero of the pros at the 3 tennis facilities I play at use Babolats. I have taken drills from several of the club pros and asked them about racquets and they all unanimously hate Babolat because they are so stiff and pingy.

Wilson and head(for some unkown reason) seem to be the dominate racquets of choice in my area.

Wilson and Head sponsor the most teaching Pros I would think. Head gives contracts to USPTA pros now, and Wilson use to sponsor the USPTA before Head. Babolats are an acquired taste for those that have used other brands previously. Babolat racquets are all about preference.

Next time someone tells you that they hate a particular brand of racquet ask how many different racquets from the brand they have tried. For some, one racquet, or apple, can spoil the entire bunch.

-SF
 
Wilson and Head sponsor the most teaching Pros I would think. Head gives contracts to USPTA pros now, and Wilson use to sponsor the USPTA before Head. Babolats are an acquired taste for those that have used other brands previously. Babolat racquets are all about preference.

Next time someone tells you that they hate a particular brand of racquet ask how many different racquets from the brand they have tried. For some, one racquet, or apple, can spoil the entire bunch.

-SF

yeah, i remember i asked my coach last year if he was ever offered any sponsorships, becuase my former coach used to get 1 tour level racquet a year from prince for coaching. the reason i asked my coach is he had two of the prince graphite 2's and broke one. he ended up signing up with wilson, and chose a wilson npro open x, then bought a second. he later told me he could have signed with head and recieved two fxp prestige frames.

the thing that bothered me the most was that i can easily beat my coach, and am more skilled than he is in every way except he is a little better at aiming on the serve. but i dont get noticed b/c i didnt get to state :/
 
yeah, i remember i asked my coach last year if he was ever offered any sponsorships, becuase my former coach used to get 1 tour level racquet a year from prince for coaching. the reason i asked my coach is he had two of the prince graphite 2's and broke one. he ended up signing up with wilson, and chose a wilson npro open x, then bought a second. he later told me he could have signed with head and recieved two fxp prestige frames.

the thing that bothered me the most was that i can easily beat my coach, and am more skilled than he is in every way except he is a little better at aiming on the serve. but i dont get noticed b/c i didnt get to state :/

There are two reasons to give partial sponsorships / preferred packages to players:

Primarily it is to lock a tournament player into their brand by giving them a reasonable discount. They hope the player will windup buying more and more gear, which due to the sizable investment as well as the contract it locks the player into their brand. Secondarily, they hope the player using their brand will increases brand awareness.

The big reason to give teaching pros contracts:

As well, when a brand signs a teaching pro to a contract they do it to increase sales, and brand awareness. These contracts are a bit like pyramid schemes. A signed pro receives certain goods upon signing. Usually it's a racquet, some string, shirt, hat, etc. The teaching pro then recommends that brands racquets to their students, who then hopefully stay with the brand, play tournaments, get the preferred packages, so forth. The pro gets a kick back in form of more goods. Bottom line is that they can be considered to be on commission. Some pros actively try to participate and others do not. It varies.
How good a player the instructor is does not matter. Only that they sell student's their brand's racquet, and hopefully instruct a kid that can sell products.

-SF
 
yeah, i remember i asked my coach last year if he was ever offered any sponsorships, becuase my former coach used to get 1 tour level racquet a year from prince for coaching. the reason i asked my coach is he had two of the prince graphite 2's and broke one. he ended up signing up with wilson, and chose a wilson npro open x, then bought a second. he later told me he could have signed with head and recieved two fxp prestige frames.

the thing that bothered me the most was that i can easily beat my coach, and am more skilled than he is in every way except he is a little better at aiming on the serve. but i dont get noticed b/c i didnt get to state :/

Dude you have to do a lot more than get to your high school state tournament to get discounted, let alone free, racquets. I was part of the Babolat Competition Team in Juniors. You can get it if you are ranked high enough or if you play college tennis. Generally in college tennis the team buys all the players gear. Or at least at our school.

Your coach is probably a USPTA level 2 or higher. I think that if they are a level 2 or higher they can sign a contract with head and they get 2 racquets free. They can also sign with another company if they choose. It sounds like your coach choose to sign with Wilson. Wilson is very good to their pro's. They get points every year and they can use those points to buy racquets, strings, bags, clothing or what ever else they want from Wilson. My coach for example gets 3 frames, a bag, tons of clothing and shoes, and all the string that he'll ever need. They also can purchase any Wilson gear for very discounted rates. As far as head goes I dont know much but I do know that pros that have signed with Prince get a bag and 2 frames. Im not sure about string but Im sure they get some.

Now back to the original subject of this thread. I think that Tecnifibre is trying to follow the ways of Babloat. In college tennis right now its hard to find a team that doesn't at least use TF strings. Also I have friends that are trying to make it on the pro level right now and TF has helped them a lot. At first they gave them tons of free stuff and now most of them have signed contracts with them worth some serious cash. (well serious compared to how much they are making from their prize money) TF has literally made it possible for most of them to stay with it.
 
Nice article.

I still dont see the huge popularity (locally) though.

I tried several of the racquets and just cant seem to like them. In my area I only know of 2 people who use Babolat racquets male or female and absolutely zero of the pros at the 3 tennis facilities I play at use Babolats. I have taken drills from several of the club pros and asked them about racquets and they all unanimously hate Babolat because they are so stiff and pingy.

Wilson and head(for some unkown reason) seem to be the dominate racquets of choice in my area.

Because they sell Wilson and Head at Sports Authority.
 
Dude you have to do a lot more than get to your high school state tournament to get discounted, let alone free, racquets. I was part of the Babolat Competition Team in Juniors. You can get it if you are ranked high enough or if you play college tennis. Generally in college tennis the team buys all the players gear. Or at least at our school.

Your coach is probably a USPTA level 2 or higher. I think that if they are a level 2 or higher they can sign a contract with head and they get 2 racquets free. They can also sign with another company if they choose. It sounds like your coach choose to sign with Wilson. Wilson is very good to their pro's. They get points every year and they can use those points to buy racquets, strings, bags, clothing or what ever else they want from Wilson. My coach for example gets 3 frames, a bag, tons of clothing and shoes, and all the string that he'll ever need. They also can purchase any Wilson gear for very discounted rates. As far as head goes I dont know much but I do know that pros that have signed with Prince get a bag and 2 frames. Im not sure about string but Im sure they get some.

Now back to the original subject of this thread. I think that Tecnifibre is trying to follow the ways of Babloat. In college tennis right now its hard to find a team that doesn't at least use TF strings. Also I have friends that are trying to make it on the pro level right now and TF has helped them a lot. At first they gave them tons of free stuff and now most of them have signed contracts with them worth some serious cash. (well serious compared to how much they are making from their prize money) TF has literally made it possible for most of them to stay with it.

Thats interesting how much TF has invested in them as little known as they are...if you don't mind do they have world rankings or any kind of rankings...what range are they in?
 
The article says they refuse to sell to big box stores like Walmart (and I"m guessing Sports Authority and ***** is off the list too) I'm calling BALONEY on that one... I guess they will "refuse" until any one of those stores decide to stock a Bab racket.
 
The article says they refuse to sell to big box stores like Walmart (and I"m guessing Sports Authority and ***** is off the list too) I'm calling BALONEY on that one... I guess they will "refuse" until any one of those stores decide to stock a Bab racket.

I know, they refuse to sell in stores like Walmart, yet they make recreational racquets...

How does that work out?
 
I didn't think Sport Chalet was such a "choice" tennis store but since they stock Babolats, they must really be something? hahah
 
They really created an amazing racquet with the Pure Drive it appealed to a lot of amateur players with it's combo of power and serve delivery. It sold itself and won several awards. Then they created the APD which did the same for topspin. The created 2 very appealing racquets for amateur players out there. That really helped them. The por players associated with them would only help sell some racquets at best because if those 2 racquets sucked - they would never have become best selling racquets (no matter who used them in the pros)!
 
They really created an amazing racquet with the Pure Drive it appealed to a lot of amateur players with it's combo of power and serve delivery. It sold itself and won several awards. Then they created the APD which did the same for topspin. The created 2 very appealing racquets for amateur players out there. That really helped them. The por players associated with them would only help sell some racquets at best because if those 2 racquets sucked - they would never have become best selling racquets (no matter who used them in the pros)!

funny that it was first designed by Prokennex for women back in the 90's or so
 
i've also heard is was an old PK mold as well. Heard it from stringers, sales reps, insiders, you name it. What's your version of the story?
 
From someone working at Babolat (I used to live in Lyons, where the headquarters are located)

He had no reason to lie. And I saw many different soft drive (?) molds (unpainted)
 
From someone working at Babolat (I used to live in Lyons, where the headquarters are located)

He had no reason to lie. And I saw many different soft drive (?) molds (unpainted)

but can you tell us if it used to be an old prokennex frame.... hopefully it is a well known fact in the tennis industry that Prokennex used to make frames for most of the tennis racquet manufacturs

i really need a life.............
 
Thats interesting how much TF has invested in them as little known as they are...if you don't mind do they have world rankings or any kind of rankings...what range are they in?

TF started with them when they first started and they are all now in the 200 range. Some have gone lower, but most are around 200-400.
 
for me, babolat is as popular as it is down to one thing, good advertising. they make good rackets to, but they signed up roddick, nadal, clijsters and other popular players when they were young who all seemed to come through at the same time. as for the rackets, ones such as the drive rackets seem to break easily and there returns in the uk is shocking, ive been at my shop for 3 years, we must have sent back 20 babolats in that time, maybe 3 were replaced. thats not saying more babolats break than other rackets, just thay they dont deal with it properly. however, i used to use aero pro drives and loved them, so there not that bad, they will never stop growing. in the uk, they are massive, all the kids want them and now they are getting better at game improver rackets, the future is looking even better for them.
 
Here in my area of the south, Wilson, still reigns supreme. This is mostly due to Wilson and Head sponsoring teaching pros. Babolat does have a package for USPTA, but it's more like a preferred player package. Not an actual sponsorship. Mostly juniors and older players who come from attending Newcombe camps use Babolats at the facility teach at. It's mostly Wilson, though.

-SF
 
I've never really gelled with any Babolat racquet that I've tried and have never purchased one.

But, I always find the Babolat racquet story amazing. These racquets were NOWHERE on the tennis radar when I was a kid (I'm 35), in college, or even post-college. The small amount of time that Babolat racquets have gone from being a novelty to being such a normal part of the game that you don't even blink when you see one, is phenomenal.
 
I signed with babolat here in the UK in the mid/late 90s, i demo'd the first pure drive paint job but my kit when it arrived was from the second generation.They were making them themselves by then but the guy who signed me up told me at the time that they were originally from a PK ramg that was tweaked for them. You could tell they were small by comparison at the time and had a bizzare set up to place an order (for any amount) I could phone Lyon direct and have them send the stuff to me.Can you imagine picking up the phone calling any manufacturer direct and saying oh send me one pd i'll pay you in 30 days but I knew coaches who'd do it.Obviously changed a bit now.
THey became so big because of excellent marketing, product saturation and a large dose of luck too.
 
Babolat has really done a great job:

they've managed to, for the most part, get juniors and promising youngsters REALLY interested in their product, be it frames or strings, and have a niche in the market as being high-end but still feasible.

Nice.
 
I'm struck by a paragraph in the article that includes the following sentences; '...the company has never needed to offer endorsement deals...' and '(Pete Sampras was one of the few players who received free strings)'. There were a lot of pros who were sporting the 2 line logo on their strings before Babolat started making racquets. I can also remember players who had the the 2 lines and a big 'VS' logo in their racquets--I don't think they did it just because it looked cool. A set of VS gut had a list of players who used their strings on the packaging (I still have some of those unopened packages). I played satellite circuits with players you never heard of who got free strings from Babolat. So, I don't believe the article is entirely accurate.

Free gut?? or Free synthetic???

Also, the article said Roddick won 3/4 jr GS. I'm pretty sure he only won 2, the Aussie & the US Open.
 
When Babolat first started selling racquets in the US in the 90s, the owner of a pro shop told me he had a hard time getting the racquets -- not because they were selling alot of them, which they weren't as yet, but because Babolat gave so many of them to promising young players that there literally weren't enough to go around for the retailers.
 
Back
Top