Interesting Gulbis Interview, speaks of dislike for Djokovic among other things

President

Legend
http://www.onthegotennis.com/home/ernests-gulbis-doesnt-like-novak-anymore.html

About giving interviews

I never say "no" to positive and interesting interviews. What I don't like is to talk to tabloid papers or to sports journalists who ask same questions about same topics every time. But I also feel like I need to achieve more in my career to be able to tell something more. At the moment I'm like 30th in the world, when I'll reach more then maybe I will open up more in interviews.

About feelings for the success of other tennis players.

I'm really happy for some of the guys. I'm really happy for Wawrinka for reaching semi final, for Gasquet too. I know those guys well, they are cool. Some of the top guys like Novak I don't like too much.


About dislike for Novak Djokovic.

I've known him since I was 12 years old. We trained and lived together in the same room in Munich. I remember he was a normal, cool guy. But when he achieved his first big success then the look in his eyes just changed. You could just feel it. It's not like we argued or anything, I just feel like he has changed and I don't like that in people. I like strong characters who don't change when first success or money appear - that's the most important quality for me and it's also important for myself not to change.


About money and success in sports

Everybody has their own preferances and ideas where to spend their money. We shouldn't look into other people's wallets and count their money. We should always respect sportsmen because they achieve everything on their own - you can't buy success in sports. And you have to work really hard and say "no" to many things - have to say "no" to parties, have to say "no" to most things normal people could afford to do. For example, office worker could afford to not sleep one night and then just carry on working the next day - we can't afford it. When I was 18-20 years old, I thought I could do it all, but it doesn't work like that. In this last year I've come to a realisation that only through saying "no" and through pain you can get something out of this life. I have finally started to think the right way.


About motivation and changes

There have happened few things in my life that made me think. I try to find positives in every negative. I now like what I do, I like the way I think now. I'm maybe... yeah, I'm a little bit different man now. I hope I'm better.


About mental toughness of tennis

In my opinion tennis is one of the toughest sports - mentally, because you are always alone. You are very alone on court, you don't have anybody to blame or to ask for help to, you are all alone and if you happen to have a bad day then you have a bad day and you have to deal with it. In team sports if you have a bad day, your team can still win - you could give a pass or cheer your teammate, he will score and everything will be alright, team will win and you'll still get that winning feeling. In tennis you are alone. That's the most tireing thing.


About the support of coach and father

Coach is sitting by the side. Of course there is eye contact, maybe few exchanges of words. You can see most players emotionally communicate with their box during matches. All of your team is sitting there and they too are almost like playing. My coach and my father after matches are both exhausted, tired and emotionally drained following the match and thinking about the result. Of course sometimes it's helpful to get a cheer at the right moment or eye contact from father, it helps. But for the most part you are still alone on the court.


About tennis schedule

That's why tennis is so terrible (reffering to interviewer mentioning that there are matches over 4 hours long). I really envy other sports - basketball, hockey, football (soccer) - big team sports. They always have constant time when they are going to play, they have constant schedule, they know their full schedule like a year in advance. They can plan for everything - like when they'll reach their peak form. And they have constant match duration.


About tennis expenses

You pay for plane tickets, your coach, eating - you have to pay for everything. And it just seems like if you play GS and get 20 000 dollars for losing in first round that you have 20 000 in your pocket and it's all good. If I you were from USA or England then if you play well, tennis federation helps, gives money, supports you. Raonic, for example, gets like half a million a year from tennis federation to cover all his expenses and everything he wins he gets to keep. It's just nice that you can keep some money for winning.


About reasons for playing

Everyone has their own reasons for playing tennis. Someone plays for the fame, others for records or money. When you reach your goal, you need to find another reason to continue to play for. Roger definitely played for money for some time. Then he got the money, he played for the fame, got the fame and played for records. Now that he has fallen in the rankings I think he plays to prove that he can make a comeback. I don't know if he can manage it, but you always have to have some kind of motivation. And money can't be the ultimate goal - it's not right, it's not a pure goal. If you think about money as a tool for helping yourself being a better person, helping people around you then it's a pure goal, but if you need money just to buy a new purse (reffering to things said earlier in the interview) then I don't understand those kind of people and why they do it.


About making a history for Latvian tennis

No matter what I do now, I'm making a history just because I'm the first Latvian player to be in the top 100. I hope I don't stop here - now I'm 30th, I hope I'll get to be 1st some day - that's my ultimate goal.


About the length of his career

I could play till 30 years old, for sure. For example, there's German Tommy Haas who is 35 years old and close to top 10. I don't think I'll be like him, but still everything changes - maybe when I'm 29 I will be thinking differently than what I'm thinking right now. Maybe when I'll be 29 I will find some additional motivation and will want to play another 5 years and if my body allows it - why not?


About preperation for Davis Cup

I don't want to upset any fans or something, but I don't prepare for this Davis Cup this week. I have come here with my coach and he says to me "I don't care how you will feel Friday or Saturday before the matches. It's important for you to feel good all year long and we work systematical work".


About distractions during matches

I have said some things that I feel like I've been wrong about. I have to be the one to deal with the problems that are around, not even problems, more like situations. I can't make someone do something I want them to. If someone feels the need to talk or walk around at a certain time then I have to accept it - it can't bother or affect me. I don't want to teach anybody of how they should act.


About provocations between players

To be honest I actually like to provocate others sometimes. I said few times about Nadal and other top players that they are boring in their interviews and such. Everybody just acts the same, everybody's the same. I don't want to be like all the others, I want to be different. Top players are money earning machines - if they would say something "not right" then they could lose contracts, sponsors and they are afraid of it. If you have started to act one way then you have to continue to act that way - Roger started to act as Swiss gentleman and now he has to continue to act like one, if he did something different, nobody would understand that. I'm all for individualism, I don't like if everybody's the same - acts the same way, talks the same way - human beings are different, I don't like when they act, I don't like when people achieve something and then suddenly start to act differently.


About how serious tennis has gotten

A While back I had a coach Pilic who remembered times when players trained, but there were no doctors, no physiotherapists. At the time it was almost like more talanted players always won, nowadays hard work makes up about 70-80% of results.


About American fans

In America people are just more open, they come up to you to talk. In Europe people are much more distant. I like when people know where Latvia is, I like when they know some of our sportsmen. Maybe some day they will know Latvia because there was Ernests Gulbis.


About making a family

Of course I think about it. But do I want to do it right now? No, I don't - I'm not ready for it, not so much emotionally with my mind, but more so money wise. I'll want a family when I'll be able to afford it, when I'll be able to give it the comfort and would like to give.


About women and language

To be completely honest, I like women from post-soviet states the most - Latvia, Russia, Belarus, Ukraine. Russian speaking women because I don't have any problems with the language and of course Latvian speaking too. Language bonds people - you can't open up in a language you don't master. I know English well, I can talk freely, but I can't clearly put my thoughts in words, I can't, I don't know, use my black humour so that they would understand in English. In Russian - everything's fine, in Latvian - everything's fine.


About future plans after tennis

Money is not my goal. But it's like a tool for me to reach my highest goals. My main objective is to be happy just like everybody else - but you have to understand it deep. How could I be happy? By doing what I enjoy and if I can help people, who I love and are close to me, be happy and find their purpose.

Translation courtesy of ROB1S at MTF.
 
Last edited:

Chico

Banned
LOL Someone is jealous of Novak's success. Guilbis should STFU and start practicing. He needs to fix that ugly forehand first.

Also he never had to change, since he lives of his daddy's money since he was born. There is nothing worse than spoiled taycoon brats passing judgements and lecturing other people.
 
Last edited:

tipsa...don'tlikehim!

Talk Tennis Guru
I'm fan of Gulbis, he says what he really thinks we need more players like that.
Janowicz also said similar things at the beginning of the year about Federer and Djokovic.
 

tipsa...don'tlikehim!

Talk Tennis Guru
J Janowicz: "I don't have any idols, I'm not following the examples of anyone. I liked Sampras for style, Safin for character. I like watching Federer, but lately I am missing Nadal because he hasn't playing for 8 months."

Then Jerzy elaborated that he liked Nadal "Because there is no fake, he behaves like in life"

Djokovic is a fake

"Djokovic is fake, he shows off and acts. Federer is a guy who wants to be above everything. In this context there might be something unnatural of him, hard to feel he is one of us" said Jerzy

"When lower ranked players were protesting because Slam organizers were paying us only 14% of their income, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic were on our side, though there are millionaires, Federer said that according to him is OK"


To be honest i'm surprised of what he says about Djokovic, but about Federer not surprised at all ! :D
 

Chico

Banned
Gulbis is a spoiled brat and Janowicz is just stupid. He thought he would get a piece of fame by thrashing top players in his local newspaper. He will get that back with interest.

Neither of them will ever win anything meaningful.
 

Backspin1183

Talk Tennis Guru
What is with these players showing no respect for Djokovic! I remember what Janowicz said about Djoko too. Or maybe they know better than we do.
 

Graf=GOAT

Professional
Gulbis is a spoiled brat and Janowicz is just stupid. He thought he would get a piece of fame by thrashing top players in his local newspaper. He will get that back with interest.

Neither of them will ever win anything meaningful.

Why are you so butthurt? :???:

Gulbis was just expressing his opinion, nothing wrong with that.
 
F

FedererWinsWimbledon2014

Guest
Delete

10gulbis
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TimeSpiral

Professional
I like Ernests quite a bit. He's earned me as a fan with his performance in Delray Beach and Cinci, specifically. There is real brilliance in his game when all cylinders are firing.

And frankly, I enjoy his counter-gentleman attitude towards the game. It's interesting.

People think his forehand is ugly because it's different. Sure, it's a flamboyant looking swing, but he's made it work, and his BH is a true weapon.

This was an interesting interview. As for his thoughts on Novak--none of us could possibly relate to that. It's personal for him. They used to be friends.
 

granddog29

Banned
That sounds about right. Djokovic used to seem like a nice guy, but by the time he got to #1 for the first time he already acted like an cocky twat. There is a reason crowds cheer for his opponent in virtually every match he plays anywhere but Serbia.
 

Backbored

Hall of Fame
Can anyone find the original source link for this interview? All it says is it was a French website. So where is the rest of it?


Ernests Gulbis gave an interview to the press in his country there are few days. Asked how he lived with the success of other players, the Latvian did not keep his tongue in his pocket. This time, it's Novak Djokovic takes for his grade.

"I'm really happy for some players. For example, I was very happy that Wawrinka reached the semifinals at the U.S. Open, ditto for Gasquet. I know these guys, they're cool. But there some other great players that I do not like that much, as Djokovic. I know since I was 12. it was trained together in Munich, we even lived in the same room. at the time it was a normal guy, a cool guy. but when he got his first big hit, his eyes, his eyes had changed. was never yelled or anything, but I just felt that it has changed because of this success. and I do not like people like that. I like strong characters that do not change based on success or money. this is an essential quality for me and that's why I'm careful not to change myself. "
 
Last edited:
F

FedererWinsWimbledon2014

Guest
"When lower ranked players were protesting because Slam organizers were paying us only 14% of their income, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic were on our side, though there are millionaires, Federer said that according to him is OK"


To be honest i'm surprised of what he says about Djokovic, but about Federer not surprised at all ! :D

In the end Federer did help with the prize money, organically he was reluctant (as a Swiss neutral) to get involved.

This thread helps explain this http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showthread.php?t=467924
 

Mainad

Bionic Poster
That sounds about right. Djokovic used to seem like a nice guy, but by the time he got to #1 for the first time he already acted like an cocky twat. There is a reason crowds cheer for his opponent in virtually every match he plays anywhere but Serbia.

I admit I'm sometimes in 2 minds about him. I basically do like him and find him funny and highly intelligent. In fact, I think he is probably the most intelligent guy who ever played on a tennis court, or at least is up there with the best.

But that self-satisfied smirk on his face can often be an irritant and I think it can get people's backs up and make them want to root for his opponent, if only to wipe it off his face. I do get that feeling myself sometimes. The 'Me Tarzan' chest-thumping and shirt-ripping when he wins a big match often has the same effect. That said, I don't think I have ever come across a more generous loser even if his victory celebrations are often a tad over-the-top!

In the end, I guess he is just a natural show-man and isn't that what many on here claim they want to see in contrast to the more restrained, more 'boring' personalities?
 

snowpuppy

Semi-Pro
J Janowicz: "I don't have any idols, I'm not following the examples of anyone. I liked Sampras for style, Safin for character. I like watching Federer, but lately I am missing Nadal because he hasn't playing for 8 months."

Then Jerzy elaborated that he liked Nadal "Because there is no fake, he behaves like in life"

Djokovic is a fake

"Djokovic is fake, he shows off and acts. Federer is a guy who wants to be above everything. In this context there might be something unnatural of him, hard to feel he is one of us" said Jerzy

"When lower ranked players were protesting because Slam organizers were paying us only 14% of their income, Nadal, Murray and Djokovic were on our side, though there are millionaires, Federer said that according to him is OK"


To be honest i'm surprised of what he says about Djokovic, but about Federer not surprised at all ! :D

I remembered it was the other way around. Federer and some other top players fought for more prize money for lower ranked players while Nadal said it was fine. Just really quickly I was only able to find the following article

http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/8765223/australian-open-ups-prize-money-early-losers

In it Federer, Djokovic, and Murray was named but not nadal. Was Jerzy speaking from biased towards Rafa?

I get the reason for the hate. Djokovic has his never ending showmanship, he really trying his best to cater to fans. Roger with all his fancy endorsements from Rolex and Mercedes with his "fashion".

Nadal on the other hand has a more low key approach to his market. If you are a journeyman, who would you think you can relate to more?

So while there's talk about who thinks who is a fake or ****** or what not, I take pro's opinion of each other with a gain of salt. It is more important for you to form you own opinions.
 

uncooling

Semi-Pro
Poor Djokovic,

he can't win titles now,

he has much less fans than Nadal, Federer (or even Murray on TT),

and now his fellow tennis pros also dislike him, while Nadal gets soooo much support from ATP and WTA players.

I guess this is what he gets for his showmanship and acting for 7 years and now it's all coming back right at him.

I'm glad that Djokovic's personality is finally getting revealed by players (Nadal, Federer, Gulbis, Janowicz, etc.) and even his fans.
 

Clarky21

Banned
Gulbis is just saying what anyone who is decent at reading people already knows. Cvac is phony and the best politician on tour. Too bad there are so many suckers who fall for his bs.
 

vladap

Professional
No one knows Djokovic better than his 12 yo pal Gulbis...and maybe a few Albanian mind-readers. That's just a fact of life.
 

granddog29

Banned
I admit I'm sometimes in 2 minds about him. I basically do like him and find him funny and highly intelligent. In fact, I think he is probably the most intelligent guy who ever played on a tennis court, or at least is up there with the best.

But that self-satisfied smirk on his face can often be an irritant and I think it can get people's backs up and make them want to root for his opponent, if only to wipe it off his face. I do get that feeling myself sometimes. The 'Me Tarzan' chest-thumping and shirt-ripping when he wins a big match often has the same effect. That said, I don't think I have ever come across a more generous loser even if his victory celebrations are often a tad over-the-top!

In the end, I guess he is just a natural show-man and isn't that what many on here claim they want to see in contrast to the more restrained, more 'boring' personalities?

I agree with most of that, and I especialy agree he is quite a gracious loser but one of the most ungracious winners. Usually it is much easier to be the other way around, but not for him. Maybe that is why crowds regularly cheer for him to lose. :)
 

marc45

G.O.A.T.
Gulbis is entitled to his opinion like anybody else but he is a hugely imperfect messenger when it comes to character evaluations it would seem. Claims not to want to tell anybody how to be, but implicitly or explicitly does it anyway. I learn to ignore many things athletes say at any rate. Big thing is, I'm still not convinced this guy gets it when it comes to what makes a player a champion. He had a great opportunity at the Open but blew it. All that promise that was showing in the spring is fading yet he seems more concerned with others. Deep down I wonder how much he really cares about winning.
 
Last edited:

THUNDERVOLLEY

G.O.A.T.
Gulbis is a spoiled brat and Janowicz is just stupid. He thought he would get a piece of fame by thrashing top players in his local newspaper. He will get that back with interest.

Neither of them will ever win anything meaningful.

Between the lines: you're still sore over Nadal's complete destruction of Djokovic.
 

marc45

G.O.A.T.
I still like the old "I like Sampras for style and Safin for character" comments. I thought Pete had great style, but I suspect most people would reverse those statements.
 

Terenigma

G.O.A.T.
I agree with what he said about Djokovic, success went to his head and when you compare him to other slam winners, he really does seem like the arrogant cocky one. Federer is a sore loser but he handles winning with grace and Murray/Nadal are both extremely humble and respectful in both wins and losses.

I do however think he has tried to tone it down a bit now tho, he's been quite likable this year but i fear its too late. In 10 years time, he wont be mentioned as much as his talent and success deserves.
 

Roddick85

Hall of Fame
Interesting interview. However, i'm not sure if the criticism of Federer/Djokovic is because of the way they act or because they were the top players for the last 5-6 years? There's always been some arrogance from Roger, he is indeed a bit of a sore loser, I'll give you that. I never sensed any arrogance from Djokovic thought, don't see where that comes from? Always a humble loser, kind of a bad winner. I don't think it's impossible that Gulbis is saying that out of jealousy.


If your going to reach the top of any sport, I think it's impossible to do so without being arrogant and thinking your better than your opposition.
 

heninfan99

Talk Tennis Guru
Despite all his talk I was front row of Gulbis' last US Open meltdown. He threw his smashed racket right at my feet! I don't think these outbursts help him. His mind seemed a mess.

I did notice, walking around the grounds, that the US Open literally had a little work shop under the bleachers where he played his match and workers started using a circular saw during the match! So you had airplane noise, saw noise and you can see he was overwhelmed.

The guy he lost too was playing excellent tennis that day. Nothing to get mad about on that end.
 
Last edited:

President

Legend
Interesting interview. However, i'm not sure if the criticism of Federer/Djokovic is because of the way they act or because they were the top players for the last 5-6 years? There's always been some arrogance from Roger, he is indeed a bit of a sore loser, I'll give you that. I never sensed any arrogance from Djokovic thought, don't see where that comes from? Always a humble loser, kind of a bad winner. I don't think it's impossible that Gulbis is saying that out of jealousy.


If your going to reach the top of any sport, I think it's impossible to do so without being arrogant and thinking your better than your opposition.

In the past, Gulbis has made comments about a "mystery" top player who praised his opponents in public and on the court while trashing them in the locker room. Seems pretty clear to me that it was Djokovic he was talking about.
 

Crisstti

Legend
How many active ATP players have spoken of their like for Djokovic?

Nadal, he talked very highly of him in his USO 2010 post match press conference. Many of Rafa's fans seem to think that Rafa dislikes him now, and maybe he likes him less, but I still get the impression he likes him. They're playing two exos in South America later this year. Why would he if he didn't like him to some degree at least?, the other two guys he's playing with are friends of his (Ferrer and Nalbandián)
There's also Isner I believe.

I remembered it was the other way around. Federer and some other top players fought for more prize money for lower ranked players while Nadal said it was fine. Just really quickly I was only able to find the following article

http://espn.go.com/tennis/story/_/id/8765223/australian-open-ups-prize-money-early-losers

In it Federer, Djokovic, and Murray was named but not nadal. Was Jerzy speaking from biased towards Rafa?

I get the reason for the hate. Djokovic has his never ending showmanship, he really trying his best to cater to fans. Roger with all his fancy endorsements from Rolex and Mercedes with his "fashion".

Nadal on the other hand has a more low key approach to his market. If you are a journeyman, who would you think you can relate to more?

So while there's talk about who thinks who is a fake or ****** or what not, I take pro's opinion of each other with a gain of salt. It is more important for you to form you own opinions.

No, you remember wrong. Nadal was not mentioned in that article because he had by that time quit the players' council. But it was mentioned by more than one player that Federer had not supported (at least initially) the demand for more money and had said it was fine. Davydenko I think was the other one. And these are the players who said something publicly.

In the past, Gulbis has made comments about a "mystery" top player who praised his opponents in public and on the court while trashing them in the locker room. Seems pretty clear to me that it was Djokovic he was talking about.

Could well be, when you think of what he said in Serbian on the court after his match against Murray in Rome 2011.
 

JRstriker12

Hall of Fame
Too bad Gulbis only gets publicity for his "honest" comments and not for his play on tour. It was entertaining at first but now it's just old.

I'm getting a little tired of this schtick. Gulbis makes some comment to gain attention, everyone runs in and takes it as the truth. It's easy to snipe and make comments at the guys at the top of the game. Maybe he should talk less and work more.

Sure, maybe they aren't friends any more but there are two sides and I'm betting Djoker doesn't have the need or time to drag this thing out in the public. Why waste the energy?

If Ernests is as mental and negative as a friend as he is on court, I could see how he might get dropped.

But honestly, who in their right mind doesn't know that Djoker is more than a bit cocky.
 

Kemosabe

New User
Only thing that I have a problem with is seeing Gulbis speaking out on issues regarding "money" and "earnings" and "expenses".

Dude grew up as a part of one of the richest families in his entire country. Parents are multi-multi-millionaires and will be for generations.
 

marc45

G.O.A.T.
Nadal, he talked very highly of him in his USO 2010 post match press conference. Many of Rafa's fans seem to think that Rafa dislikes him now, and maybe he likes him less, but I still get the impression he likes him. They're playing two exos in South America later this year. Why would he if he didn't like him to some degree at least?, the other two guys he's playing with are friends of his (Ferrer and Nalbandián)
There's also Isner I believe.



No, you remember wrong. Nadal was not mentioned in that article because he had by that time quit the players' council. But it was mentioned by more than one player that Federer had not supported (at least initially) the demand for more money and had said it was fine. Davydenko I think was the other one. And these are the players who said something publicly.



Could well be, when you think of what he said in Serbian on the court after his match against Murray in Rome 2011.

yeah, I don't think Nadal has any problem with Novak..now, Novak's dad?..that's another matter, I think many of the top guys have issues with him
 

Roddick85

Hall of Fame
In the past, Gulbis has made comments about a "mystery" top player who praised his opponents in public and on the court while trashing them in the locker room. Seems pretty clear to me that it was Djokovic he was talking about.

I missed that one.
 

uncooling

Semi-Pro
In the past, Gulbis has made comments about a "mystery" top player who praised his opponents in public and on the court while trashing them in the locker room. Seems pretty clear to me that it was Djokovic he was talking about.

Yes, everyone figured out it was Djokovic back then. And now it's getting clearer with his recent comments and some other players' comment on Djokovic.
 
People will say Gulbis is a jerk but I applaud Ernest for his HONESTY this guy does not give a crap what the top guys think about him. Although Gulbis hasn't beaten Nadal yet I feel he is going to to. Gulbis has gotten close because he has the RIGHT ATTITUDE he is not going to kiss Nadal's butt and say he is God or whatever. Djokovic does come across as pretentious at times. Remember, in Montreal when he wore the Afro wig dancing? The guy can be very tacky and extra. Gulbis is right for calling Novak out for being a FRAUD!
 

octogon

Hall of Fame
Nadal, he talked very highly of him in his USO 2010 post match press conference. Many of Rafa's fans seem to think that Rafa dislikes him now, and maybe he likes him less, but I still get the impression he likes him. They're playing two exos in South America later this year. Why would he if he didn't like him to some degree at least?, the other two guys he's playing with are friends of his (Ferrer and Nalbandián)
There's also Isner I believe.


.

I don't think Nadal cares for Novak at all. Not specifically because he started losing to him, but because of the obnoxious, boorish behavior Djoker and his family started showing after he went on his win streak against Rafa in 2000. Like Guilbis said, Djoker's true colors came out when he reached the top. I think Nadal liked him in 2010, because Djoker was still being chummy and respectful towards Nadal. Nadal saw he was an egotistical ***** after 2011. Djoker never revealed his true nature to Nadal, so Nadal was suckered into liking him for a little bit. i don't believe he'd ever talk thatkindly about Djoker again today.

Exos are about money (and having a responsibility to promote the tour). Sampras and Agassi played many exos, yet they outright loathe each ther. Serena and Maria Sharapova have done exos together, yet they hate each other. Rafa and Novak doing exos isn't really evidence of much.

Federer and Nadal genuinely got along, but I felt they would have done many exos together even if they didn't like each other, because they both feel a responsibility to promte the sport as it's biggest stars.
 

wy2sl0

Hall of Fame
Ridiculously good interview. Why? Because he is an athlete speaking his mind.

We don't really get to see the real anyone just like he says. Fed wore the white suit to the Wimbledon final. Come on now. Can't take losing.

Djokovic, it is pretty obvious from how annoying his parents are that he really may be much different.

Nadal and Murray seem like genuine guys. Nadal washing his own car and drying his own court earned a lot of respect from me. He IS a great role model to our sport, and I think that is because of his family teaching him that. At the same time, I think Nadal being himself with the Rosol shoulder bump and the interview after he played Gulbis seemed honest as well. What drives me nuts is the "I must play 100% with the right feelings if I want chance to win" (against player ranked 150).
 
Last edited:

bullfan

Legend
Gulbis is a spoiled brat and Janowicz is just stupid. He thought he would get a piece of fame by thrashing top players in his local newspaper. He will get that back with interest.

Neither of them will ever win anything meaningful.

Sounds like someone is a bit jealous....

Gulbis is the most honest guy on tour. He can afford to be, he doesn't have any sponsors to support him... Of course, I think that he doesn't have the same motivation as other folks. It would be good to see him strive and achieve some top honors, but I'm not sure I think he'll do it any more than I think Monfils will. I see Gulbis and Monfils as 2 talented guys, that will never live up to thier potential.
 

papertank

Hall of Fame
I really like Gulbis. He's honest but not arrogant, and doesn't care what anyone thinks about him. He also seems to have a pretty good head on his shoulders. He'd be a good ambassador for the sport, tennis could do with a little fire at the top.
 

bullfan

Legend
I really like Gulbis. He's honest but not arrogant, and doesn't care what anyone thinks about him. He also seems to have a pretty good head on his shoulders. He'd be a good ambassador for the sport, tennis could do with a little fire at the top.

I wouldn't go as far as. Good ambassador for the sport. He's admitted to not taking the sport seriously, and treating it like a party scene. He's honest, but he has the luxury of being a huge trust fund kid.
 
Top