PCXL-Fan
Hall of Fame
Is Andre Agassi permanently 1 fast grass slam & 1 carpet World Tour Final ahead of Nadal as a more diverse champion?
Agassi has won-
Australian Open 1995, 2000, 2001, 2003
RolandGarros1999
Wimbledon1992
USOpen1994,1999
WTF1990 (carpet)
Since Agassi won a Slam on serve&volley era pre-slowed fast-grass (Wimbledon), a World Tour Final on carpet vs #1 ranked Prime Edberg, and multiple slower surface Slams (Roland Garros and Australian) would this place him as a more diverse champion than Nadal, having won the biggest titles of all the four surfaces (and Nadal has never done this)? If current fast surfaces are counter to Nadals game, how would he win the biggest fast court events vs top players in the greater surface diversification in the 90s? What is Nadals diversification legacy if there has been a huge push for surface homogenization in Nadal's era, and Nadal cannot win on the current lukewarmishly current "fastcourts"?
Agassi has won-
Australian Open 1995, 2000, 2001, 2003
RolandGarros1999
Wimbledon1992
USOpen1994,1999
WTF1990 (carpet)
Since Agassi won a Slam on serve&volley era pre-slowed fast-grass (Wimbledon), a World Tour Final on carpet vs #1 ranked Prime Edberg, and multiple slower surface Slams (Roland Garros and Australian) would this place him as a more diverse champion than Nadal, having won the biggest titles of all the four surfaces (and Nadal has never done this)? If current fast surfaces are counter to Nadals game, how would he win the biggest fast court events vs top players in the greater surface diversification in the 90s? What is Nadals diversification legacy if there has been a huge push for surface homogenization in Nadal's era, and Nadal cannot win on the current lukewarmishly current "fastcourts"?
Last edited: