It's more like Djokovic = Jay Z.Federer = Biggie
Nadal = Pac
Djokovic = Vanilla Ice
I never understand how a Nadal fan can call Djokovic boring. I get it if a Federer fan says it since he's known as the artist but not a Nadal fan. Djokovic has more surface range and dominated all surfaces at some point in his career. As a tennis fan, I find that more exciting than watching a player win 65-70% of their big titles/Slams at 4 or 5 venues.Only fake tennis fans and non-players think Djokovic's tennis is boring. If you had a real appreciation for the sport you'd realize how special a talent he is. Maybe if you played tennis you'd realize that.
I wish we could all grow up and understand how awful of a band they truly are.Fed can be RHCP; initially raw and unhinged, then with a more refined and insane peak (Mothers Milk -> Blood Sugar -> OHM), then steadily declined but went on forever. Could even go down the racket = guitarist route for another unrealistic parallel (universe).
So they are all...awful?Federer: Backstreet Boys
Nadal: Nsync
Djokovic: Spice Girls
A shame there are wrong sounds, huh. Anyway, I have no time for basically any of their last 6 or however many albums, so carry on by all means.I wish we could all grow up and understand how awful of a band they truly are.
oh god where to beginAIC played metal, Nirvana played some sort of alternative punk with metal influences, and Pearl Jammies were a pop rock group.
Nowhere.oh god where to begin
what are those Nirvana metal influences exactly
Joking aside...oh god where to begin
what are those Nirvana metal influences exactly
all of them got aped pretty bad by the post-grunge/pop punk/alt metal crowdPearl Jam is a good band but can be a bit boring and predictable at times and to blame for the whole post-grunge scene.
Pearl Jammies, they were the definition of boring and safe.all of them got aped pretty bad by the post-grunge/pop punk/alt metal crowd
I'm talking about the music not the image. The only Nirvana song one could maybe call metal is Scentless Apprentice.Just because Nirvana's image was fake punk / fake rebels and they dressed like lumberjacks does not mean their heaviness wasn't to an extent metal-related.
Soundgarden were transparently metal since the beginning even though they aligned themselves with the alternative crowd. They sometimes felt like a Black Sabbath tribute band lol (except Chris's pipes)Soundgarden too tried to negate their metal roots, despite the fact that all these pretentious Seattle kids grew up on metal, which is very obvious in their music...
Alternative metal was a real thing in the 90s. Especially early 90s.I'm talking about the music not the image. The only Nirvana song one could maybe call metal is Scentless Apprentice.
Soundgarden were transparently metal since the beginning even though they aligned themselves with the alternative crowd. They sometimes felt like a Black Sabbath tribute band lol (except Chris's pipes)
Nu metal era in the late 90s, early 00s would be the tennis equivalent of all big 4 getting injured around 2012 and Nishikori, Dimitrov and Raonic taking their place instead.all of them got aped pretty bad by the post-grunge/pop punk/alt metal crowd
Nah there were some pretty good bands too. Deftones, System of a Down, and... huh... I'm sure I can name some othersNu metal era in the late 90s, early 00s would be the tennis equivalent of all big 4 getting injured around 2012 and Nishikori, Dimitrov and Raonic taking their place instead.
Metal Archives?Nirvana had more in common with Pixies than with any metal band, as any non-deaf listener could tell.
Anyway, our purist friends over at the Metal Archives seem to have decided Alice in Chains and Soundgarden qualify to be a part of their encyclopedia, while Nirvana don't.
(although of course, this is the same website that doesn't consider Tool to be metal)
Yeah I can't stand them either to be fair.Metal Archives?
Their criteria is notorious. There are a bunch of metal bands they don't accept - and always for image reasons.
To treat those 10 neckbeards at Metal Archives as the all-knowing sages who decide musical matters is as funny as trusting RT and CNN...
Good player, but boring, nothing too interesting.
Federer is Nirvana— not the best, but transcendent, revolutionary.
Nadal is Alice In Chains — most superior riffs/musicianship, which is almost reminiscent of Nadals raw clay court ability. Falls behind Nirvana in popularity.
So you're saying Federer is 1000 times better than Djokovic?Federer is the Beatles
Nadal is Led Zeppelin
Djokovic is the Rolling Stones
So you're saying Federer is 1000 times better than Djokovic?
A bit harsh.
Or you mean he takes illegal substances?
But I want to justify ripping my racquet head off!Zverev is Limp Bizkit
Does The Rolling Stones always own the Beatles in their peak? Rolling Stones is garbage.Federer - The Beatles
Nadal - Rolling Stones
Djokovic - The Who
Murray - The Kinks
It's easy for 60's British bands.
That sounds like something Kurt Cobain would say.Grunge sucks
Does The Rolling Stones always own the Beatles in their peak? Rolling Stones is garbage.
Pink Floyd owned the Beatles in psychedelic rock. Their output peak to peak/H2H is also superior.
Nadal is PF
What's next?
A thread comparing the Big 3 with animals?
With colours?
With kitchen utensils?
FWIW Nadal likes to listen to Bon Jovi and U2 (per the Nadal book from Dominic Bliss), don't know about the other members of the "Big 3." However, I don't think the musician analogy is always the best comparison with Tennis players. I see Nadal closer to Marvin Hagler who gave accumulative punishment over 15 rounds and wears you down (as Nadal likes BO5 Matches plus ambidextrous), Djokovic akin to Sugar Ray Leonard (sprinter, great lateral movement, flexibility, reflexes), and Federer akin to Wilfred "Radar" Benitez (Wizardry, Grace, at times fragile mentally, dominated the people he needed to beat, but fell a little short against his rivals down the stretch).
Be Here Now had some very good songs, but more below average ones than expected as well. Even if you think the album is great, it did end Britpop.Hey Be Here Now wasn’t so bad, one of Oasis’ best albums if anything. Their next few albums after it were hot garbage.
Wow didn't know about that at all, but for some reason always associated the upbeat "Un Canto a Galicia" with Rafa, even though of course different parts of the country...3) Spanish singer (& songwriter) Julio Iglesias (Enrique's father), the best-selling Spanish-speaking artist in history, became Rafa's favourite singer, when Rafa was a teenager and they have had a good relationship since then. Rafa has attended his concerts in Spain and abroad.
Julio Iglesias talks about Rafa:Wow didn't know about that at all, but for some reason always associated the upbeat "Un Canto a Galicia" with Rafa, even though of course different parts of the country...
Lol at teen Rafa having similar taste in music to my grandmother. BlessSpanish singer (& songwriter) Julio Iglesias (Enrique's father), the best-selling Spanish-speaking artist in history, became Rafa's favourite singer, when Rafa was a teenager and they have had a good relationship since then.
I don’t think, Rafa has to queue. I'm sure, he gets tickets from somewhere else. For example, from someone, who has invited him
PJ doesn’t hold a candle to NV or AiC