Is Dunlop Aerogel 300 MP 16x19 the replacement for all the 300G orphans out there?

[slagvaerk]

Is it? I have been playing with the 300G MP 16x19 for years, but they are now getting seriously worn. Unfortunately, I found the M-Fil 300 to be less solid and too head heavy for me. Now, since it has been a while since Dunlop launched the Aerogel 300* line, I guess there must be quite a few that have compared 300G with Aerogel 300.** Please share your experiences/opinions...

(*16x19 98inch)

 

[arf22]

Bump. My 300g frames are starting to feel soft... (recently compared to a less - used 300g)

 

[logansc]

IMO the AG300 is much closer to the 300G than the MFil was. I like the over feel of the AG much better than the MFil also. It's definitely a great racquet. I sold mine in favor of the AG200 but that ended up being a mistake in the long term.

 

[hoodjem]

I sold mine in favor of the AG200 but that ended up being a mistake in the long term.

Logan,
Please explain. Are there things you did not like about the 200?

 

[logansc]

Logan,
Please explain. Are there things you did not like about the 200?

The AG 200 (18x20 version)...I was not a fan of the denser string pattern and the weight and balance just tired me out after a while. I was great during warm ups and casual hitting, but toward the end of a long match I tired and the racquet is not very forgiving. That's what originally drew me to the MFill 200 plus, a lighter static weight and the open string pattern really appealed to me. I loved the AG100 for this reason also. I hit great forehands and serves with the 100 but my backhand disappeared. Now with the Pure Storm because my racquet bag was stolen, its very similar to the 300 and I got a great deal on them.