Is Federer’s 4 Consecutive Years of Winning at least 2 Grand Slams underrated?

How about winning three slams in one year three different times? For reference, Rafa’s done that only once.
 
Djokovic was robbed of 2020 Wimbledon and USO or he'd have multiple slams in 6 of the last 7 seasons:

2015
2016
2018
2019
2020 (probably)
2021 (probably)
 
Djokovic was robbed of 2020 Wimbledon and USO or he'd have multiple slams in 6 of the last 7 seasons:

2015
2016
2018
2019
2020 (probably)
2021 (probably)
Yes, the Wimbledon organization should have shared the insurance indemnity amount received for the 2020 tournament suspension with Djokovic.
 
Conveniently underrated I should say.People
Great stats, I wonder why the slam rate drastically slowed down since 2008 though...
:whistle:
Right, he should have maintained the domination period at least till 2015 or something and that in the context of Djokovic and Nadal not having 2 consecutive seasons with 3 slams.
 
I wouldn't say this is an underrated stat from Federer though. I think when people talk about him winning 11 Slams in 4 years and how it's the fastest and most dominant 4 year run in the OE, they are already covering this. This gets talked about pretty often too.
 
He lost to prime Fed, Nadal, Murray in 2012 and peak Nadal/Murray in 2013

He didn’t have the luxury of multiple years facing Roddick, Bagdhatis, Gonzalez, Hewitt in slam finals :whistle:
Weren't prime Fed, Nadal and Murray all around in 2011? What happened?
 
Another proof of weak era: It is not coincidence that all his consecutive records happened during 2003-2007.

tenor.gif
 
That had whipped Nadal. Djokovic got double lucky because it gave him Career and Nole Slam on a platter.
lol hard at your desperate attempts man, everyone knows Soderling GOATed one match and went back to Pidgeon-hood afterwards. He would have ripped Feddy a new one if he'd been anywhere near the level he reached in the Rafa match lol
 
That one gets talked about all the time so it's not underrated. 4x2 on the other hand isn't really something that gets referenced often.
Cause even purely mathematically 3 times 3x in 4 years is already more than 4x2 with a year to spare.

IMO, I think it's kind of funny that Nadal gets slated for Slam distribution over surfaces when Fed's done the similar thing over time, only to make "dominance" an arbitrary metric.
 
Incorrect analysis.

Peak Federer would have beaten Murray in the USO final in 2012 and at W in 2013, plus Stan at the AO in 2014 and Nishikori at the USO that year.

Face facts, peak Federer > peak Novak Djokovic.
The bolded is debatable.

The paragraph about the bolded isn't. Fed ain't dropping slams to Murray and Stan.
 
Incorrect analysis.

Peak Federer would have beaten Murray in the USO final in 2012 and at W in 2013, plus Stan at the AO in 2014 and Nishikori at the USO that year.

Face facts, peak Federer > peak Novak Djokovic.
Peak Federer couldn’t even handle baby Nadal lmao
 
Back
Top