forzamilan90
Legend
TW verdict: Dimitrov is worthless..
Reality..: he is one of the 40 best tennis players in the world today.
The greatest Bulgarian male player.
TW verdict: Dimitrov is worthless..
Reality..: he is one of the 40 best tennis players in the world today.
TW verdict: Dimitrov is worthless..
Reality..: he is one of the 40 best tennis players in the world today.
TW verdict: Dimitrov is worthless..
Reality..: he is one of the 40 best tennis players in the world today.
TW verdict: Dimitrov is worthless..
Reality..: he is one of the 40 best tennis players in the world today.
I guess you've never seen Rajeev Ram play then?I don't think I've ever seen a pro player mimic another pro's game as closely has he does. I would have thought getting to the pro level you would've developed your own style.
Actually, this is not completely accurate.
Dimitrov has been getting ridiculous amounts of praise on this forum for years now. Based on his achievements, he does not deserve any of that praise, but since he has "elegant strokes" he is immediately chalked up as a future grand slam champion by many here.
I guess you've never seen Rajeev Ram play then?
And secondly, he's sadly proven time after time that he lacks the believing mentality of a true champion. Hope I'm wrong, but I think that's just something that one cannot learn. You're either born with it, or you'll never have it.
Frank Dancevic was the next Federer. Perhaps Dimitrov is the next Frank Dancevic.
Yeah that is why the 33/34 year old Federer has been number 2 or 3 the last couple of years...because his game is ineffectiveDimitrov is actually better than the mythical peak Federer ever was. He's brought the federian ballerina playing style to the next level. But it's just not effective anymore, as evolution has caught up with it.
Dimitrov is actually better than the mythical peak Federer ever was. He's brought the federian ballerina playing style to the next level. But it's just not effective anymore, as evolution has caught up with it.
Yeah that is why the 33/34 year old Federer has been number 2 or 3 the last couple of years...because his game is ineffective
I was just making the point that to say that players have evolved past Federer (as the poster put it) is bizarre given that Federer has spent most of the last 2 years as number 2 or 3.#sarcasm
He's still way too young....give him a chance to mature.What could’ve been.
He was never going to reach Federer level of greatness but I am disappointed that he is yet to win a major.
who's never won the Bucharest oopenThe greatest Bulgarian male player.
What could’ve been.
He was never going to reach Federer level of greatness but I am disappointed that he is yet to win a major.
Why should he win the Bucharest open? He's Bulgarian, not Romanian.who's never won the Bucharest oopen
if he won Istanbul open, would that count ?Why should he win the Bucharest open? He's Bulgarian, not Romanian.