Mike Sams
G.O.A.T.
TW members often remark that Murray has the tools but not the means to win Slams. He tends to do his best work in best of 3 sets. When seeing Murray at his best, it's quite a sight to behold as we've seen him demolish the big 3 numerous times on hardcourts. He's crunched Djokovic in straights in Miami, Toronto and Cincinnati. He's crushed Nadal in hardcourt Slams and even reduced Nadal to almost a high-school level player in the Japan final a few months ago. And he's had his way with Federer in numerous hardcourt matches including Doha, Indian Wells, Shanghai, Toronto, and Madrid indoors.
Why he's not able to get it all together to win Slams is anybody's guess although many on here say he just doesn't have the mental strength or patience to perform on the grandest stage.
But regardless of that, nobody denies his talent. He's smashed the big 3 in finals in best of 3. He can even blast the forehand when he's in the mood.
He has great touch and variety. In terms of tennis acumen and ingenuity and natural talent, do you regard Murray as a more talented player than the big 3 if he's in God-mode? Simply, is Murray's God-mode level almost untouchable against the big 3? And if he can bring that level of tennis to the business end of the Slams, can he get it done?
Why he's not able to get it all together to win Slams is anybody's guess although many on here say he just doesn't have the mental strength or patience to perform on the grandest stage.
But regardless of that, nobody denies his talent. He's smashed the big 3 in finals in best of 3. He can even blast the forehand when he's in the mood.
He has great touch and variety. In terms of tennis acumen and ingenuity and natural talent, do you regard Murray as a more talented player than the big 3 if he's in God-mode? Simply, is Murray's God-mode level almost untouchable against the big 3? And if he can bring that level of tennis to the business end of the Slams, can he get it done?