Is it Sinner's Year, Really?

FeroBango

Legend
Nah, He will win a few more slams and will remain top 5 although I doubt he reaches double digit slams or even ATG status.
Too early still to say anything really. The Sinner game is world class but not every world class game has translated to all time greatness at the same time.

He's still a disciplined kid. He should be alright theoretically.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
Too early still to say anything really. The Sinner game is world class but not every world class game has translated to all time greatness at the same time.

He's still a disciplined kid. He should be alright theoretically.
We saw the insane level he’s capable of from November 23 to early april 24.

Right now - injuries and fatigue might be catching up to him. But everyone on tour who’s made deep runs at slams and tourneys feel it. Some have been injured to start the season with very little to no rest bc they have points to defend. My take on injuries is if it’s bad enough to withdraw from tourneys you have 500-2000 points to defend : you should not lose points up to 3 tournments in that year.

What I am not liking about sinner is - after losing to Andre Rublev : he continued to grab his hip. Apparently it didn’t bother him all grass season nor Roland Garros. But it’s back?

Maybe it is. And I do like sinner. But he always will show respect to his opponent when they win then folllow it up with “I was sick before the match” , no sleep or some new injury excuse. I don’t like it bc not everyone will sleep well consistently, be feeling great every day to play high level tennis, or be 100% free of injury.

Sometimes I think jannik makes smaller injuries that most can play through bigger than they are bc he’s losing.
 

Djokodalerer31

Hall of Fame
Number 1 on paper and paper alone.

Alcaraz's year for sure with 2 slams, 1 Masters and a silver medal.

Sinner meanwhile just 1 slam and 1 Masters.

And all those cocky Sinner fans have gone very quiet.

So basically if Djokovic wins the USO and any of the two remaining masters follow up he officially has more succesful season than Sinner, reaching two slam finals, winning one of them, reaching SF and QF of the other two, winning OG and at least one masters...
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
Sinner's health does seem fragile at the moment. Doesn't bode well for his future career! :unsure:
I think he’s over selling his health issues too as an excuse when losing matches. The hype was through the roof bc of the level he displayed earlier this year winning AO, Miami, and Rotterdam running through both draws with ease (minus the AO 5 set final). I mean Miami he just whooped through everyone.

Now he’s displaying a level that’s beatable by top 10 folks.
I can’t see him being the favorite going into USO. I put him 4th right now behind Carlos, Novak and Daniil.
 

Racquet_smash

Professional
Sinner was clearly the best player in the world until March, then his injury issues kicked in.

This guy should probably take a tought about his staff, this is ridicoulus.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
So basically if Djokovic wins the USO and any of the two remaining masters follow up he officially has more succesful season than Sinner, reaching two slam finals, winning one of them, reaching SF and QF of the other two, winning OG and at least one masters...
Yep! Don’t forget about the WTF too which he’s always the biggest threat at!
 

FeroBango

Legend
Sinner could've achieved more without the injury. It doesn't look good. Reminds me of Murray, but hope he doesn't go down that path.
Hope he gets better but what looks like a tendency to immediately cite injuries during a loss/break of serve is a little off-putting.

Regardless, he's truly a formidable force when fully fit and doesn't seemingly resort to "body not well" during losses of momentum.

May he have his fire reignited.
 

chjtennis

G.O.A.T.
Hope he gets better but what looks like a tendency to immediately cite injuries during a loss/break of serve is a little off-putting.

Regardless, he's truly a formidable force when fully fit and doesn't seemingly resort to "body not well" during losses of momentum.

May he have his fire reignited.

Well, he played on even with the injury. Should be given credit for that.
 

ChrisJR3264

Hall of Fame
Looks like missing a lot of context.

Only 2 cent troll army said he will win every single thing.

He won 1 slam 1 masters and 2 500s till now. While flopping everywhere else. Improvement over 2022 already.
Yeah I mean the guy is having a great season.
People got too hyped from his level earlier. Honestly I was quite impressed bc he displayed pure dominate level tennis.

However my concern is there’s always some excuse and he always needs to let you know about it. Not cool.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
Yeah I mean the guy is having a great season.
People got too hyped from his level earlier. Honestly I was quite impressed bc he displayed pure dominate level tennis.

However my concern is there’s always some excuse and he always needs to let you know about it. Not cool.
Yes but he has many more titles to win in 2024.

I think he is entering his prime just now. He has not developed physically until this year. And probably will get fitter from here.
 
Man, these players work hard/do their best. Carlitos lost momentum after Wimbly 2023, Jannik for the last few months. Expecting permanent success is stupidity. If fit, Jannik could re-group to dominate the remaining season, but insisting he will do so deserves the slap it gets.

Jannik's hard court success is excellent this year to date winning AO/ Rotterdam/Miami. Carlitos has won IW, so clearly behind Jannik on a review of hard court success so far. But this thread title asks " Is this Sinner's Year, Really?" What is the context? In thin air, it could be 'yes', because Jannik has done well, and improved his record. Juxtaposed to Carlitos, the answer is 'no' to date, The reasons include:

1. Carlitos has won the surface slam - the youngest player ever to do so. Proves his credentials across all surfaces at the highest level.
2. Carlitos has won the Channel Slam, the youngest player ever to do so. Shows his adaptability.
3. Carlitos has defended the Wimbly and IW titles this year. Jannik hasn't defended any and overall, I think Jannik has defended only Sofia, a 250 tournament. Already to date at age 21, Carlitos has defended Barcelona (500), Madrid( 1000) IW ( 1000) and Wimbly ( GS).
4. Carlitos was the youngest ever men's singles finalist at the Olympics, and hence the youngest to win silver.

Impressive not just for his success, but that Carlitos continues to make history.
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Man, these players work hard/do their best. Carlitos lost momentum after Wimbly 2023, Jannik for the last few months. Expecting permanent success is stupidity. If fit, Jannik could re-group to dominate the remaining season, but insisting he will do so deserves the slap it gets.

Jannik's hard court success is excellent this year to date winning AO/ Rotterdam/Miami. Carlitos has won IW, so clearly behind Jannik on a review of hard court success so far. But this thread title asks " Is this Sinner's Year, Really?" What is the context? In thin air, it could be 'yes', because Jannik has done well, and improved his record. Juxtaposed to Carlitos, the answer is 'no' to date, The reasons include:

1. Carlitos has won the surface slam - the youngest player ever to do so. Proves his credentials across all surfaces at the highest level.
2. Carlitos has won the Channel Slam, the youngest player ever to do so. Shows his adaptability.
3. Carlitos has defended the Wimbly and IW titles this year. Jannik hasn't defended any and overall, I think Jannik has defended only Sofia, a 250 tournament. Already to date at age 21, Carlitos has defended Barcelona (500), Madrid( 1000) IW ( 1000) and Wimbly ( GS).
4. Carlitos was the youngest ever men's singles finalist at the Olympics, and hence the youngest to win silver.

Impressive not just for his success, but that Carlitos continues to make history.
To be fair all of this is on us. The fans. They build these guys up because of the big3 consistent winning.

It will take another 5 years without them till people start realizing winning a few slams is insane and 10 is out of this world.

The big3 was special for a reason.

We were spoiled.
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
To be fair all of this is on us. The fans. They build these guys up because of the big3 consistent winning.

It will take another 5 years without them till people start realizing winning a few slams is insane and 10 is out of this world.

The big3 was special for a reason.

We were spoiled.
Big 3 won 12/14 slams in a decade

So 5 years later it's almost impossible anyone else has 10 slams except Carlos who started winning 3 years ago now. So that would be 8 years

Sinner started winning this year itself.
 

Djokodalerer31

Hall of Fame
If he wins USO maybe but right now Alcaraz is firmly ahead with the channel slam. Still plenty of tennis left to be played this year, we'll see.

Neither will win the USO...momentum now is on Novak's side, he will be the one, even with all the recent health complications i still think he'll edge everyone out on Arthur Ashe!...all year he was falling behind until Olympics 2024...this is his turning point as i predict two next consecutive titles at the USO and Shanghai masters...however on indoors i think it will be someone else, who will shine, maybe Sinner will finally has his chance to close the year out properly, maybe it's Alcaraz or some strong indoor competitors of the past like Medvedev or Zverev...who knows...but i have Novak winning USO and Shanghai back-to-back...
 

Rosstour

G.O.A.T.
Neither will win the USO...momentum now is on Novak's side, he will be the one, even with all the recent health complications i still think he'll edge everyone out on Arthur Ashe!...all year he was falling behind until Olympics 2024...this is his turning point as i predict two next consecutive titles at the USO and Shanghai masters...

Yep. I see him taking the US title this year and going all out for Slams next year
 

NeutralFan

G.O.A.T.
Lol at least he beat him, while on sinners side, It was clear what would have happened at AO if med didnt have more hours in the legs than anyone in history on a slam final, your boy wont dominate man, he hits hard but thats It, you just need a better eye for tennis, but check this out, i dont consider you as stupid as your friend dking68, so im 100% sure youre trolling, because even a guy like him who clearly misses oxygen in the brain realized hes been the biggest idiot and has called it a day, i just keep debating because i finished eating and need to make the digestión entertaining, but i sure know you know whats what.

Nobody denied that he beat him, you're saying he had insane level that I have issue with. Insane high level doesn't requires 5 sets to beat Mugfoe lol.

Also, Sinner has been better on Harcourt in last 10 months and won way more tournaments than Carlos. How's Carlos better than Sinner on HC when Sinner has won way more tournaments in last 12 months ?? It's not trolling when I am giving you facts. Also if Sinner wins USO his year will be miles better than Carlos. I'll tag you when Sinner wins USO and AO back to back and then he will be just one slam behind. I hope you stick on ttw so i can show how wrong and naive you were,son!!
 
Last edited:

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
Big 3 won 12/14 slams in a decade

So 5 years later it's almost impossible anyone else has 10 slams except Carlos who started winning 3 years ago now. So that would be 8 years

Sinner started winning this year itself.
Yes, but they shouldn't be expected to win a bunch of slams. We expect them to do big3 level stuff, which is crazy.

We build them up too fast.
 

Juice4080

Semi-Pro
I think his ceilling is around 5 slams. I don't see the body nor the mentality to go beyond that. 5 slams is nothing to sneeze at really but some will feel like it's underachieving. Hopefully he proves me wrong. I wouldn't be mad
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
I think his ceilling is around 5 slams. I don't see the body nor the mentality to go beyond that. 5 slams is nothing to sneeze at really but some will feel like it's underachieving. Hopefully he proves me wrong. I wouldn't be mad
But that is below ATG status
 

nolefam_2024

Bionic Poster
So what... ATG is a term and I doubt a 5 slam winner would care if he required 6 slams to be called an ATG.
So Sinner who won slam at 22 won't win 6th? I am not sure but ok

Sinner is dominant number 1 at least till Wimbledon, so yeah I think he is going to be ATG
 

McGradey

Hall of Fame
Sinner definitely gonna win 100% of matches once he ups his serve consistency, grows stronger legs, dyes his hair, beds a pop star, becomes buddies with Elon Musk, sails round the world solo in a speedboat, stars in a Bollywood thriller, and creates the hottest NFT of 2027. Yeah, definitely.

giphy.gif
 
To be fair all of this is on us. The fans. They build these guys up because of the big3 consistent winning.

It will take another 5 years without them till people start realizing winning a few slams is insane and 10 is out of this world.

The big3 was special for a reason.

We were spoiled.
If I understand you, I see it differently. Supporting a talented player /assessing their abilities & achievements has nothing to do with the big 3.
If I think Carlitos / Jannik have the potential to achieve great results, it's because of that potential. I disagree the premise that the achievements of the big 3 cannot be matched / superseded, whilst fully accepting that it will take something very special for it to happen, and that we may not see it happening anytime soon. All records set a bar, and reaching that bar should be the aim of all who follow. Healthy aspirations should not be treated as an affront to the spectacular achievements of the big 3 / several other great players.

Expecting consistency / dedication / is natural, because the best prevalent players must aspire to remain great players and achieve more success. Their fans are entitled to anticipate good results from a talented player, fitness permitting. It doesn't require us to compare them to the big 3 or anyone else when expecting them to do well. It's exciting to witness the unfolding of a great career for young players developing their game. The constant refrain of 'they'll never match the big 3' is pointless/tedious, because as far as I can tell, no tennis fan underestimates their achievements.
 

Lleytonstation

Talk Tennis Guru
If I understand you, I see it differently. Supporting a talented player /assessing their abilities & achievements has nothing to do with the big 3.
If I think Carlitos / Jannik have the potential to achieve great results, it's because of that potential. I disagree the premise that the achievements of the big 3 cannot be matched / superseded, whilst fully accepting that it will take something very special for it to happen, and that we may not see it happening anytime soon. All records set a bar, and reaching that bar should be the aim of all who follow. Healthy aspirations should not be treated as an affront to the spectacular achievements of the big 3 / several other great players.

Expecting consistency / dedication / is natural, because the best prevalent players must aspire to remain great players and achieve more success. Their fans are entitled to anticipate good results from a talented player, fitness permitting. It doesn't require us to compare them to the big 3 or anyone else when expecting them to do well. It's exciting to witness the unfolding of a great career for young players developing their game. The constant refrain of 'they'll never match the big 3' is pointless/tedious, because as far as I can tell, no tennis fan underestimates their achievements.
I can slightly agree with these sentiments.

However, not for Sinner. Carlos has shown and has actually achieved greatness. Now, I do not see him equaling the big3, nor does he have to in order to become something insanely special.

Sinner on the other hand has done nothing other than show signs of potential. His one slam is starting to look more like a fluke. Either way, expecting him to win more than 3-5 slams is ludicrous in my eyes. He might be more in the Med, Thiem, and Delpo category. Which by the way, deserves respect as they are slam winners.

Point is, words like potential, hope, could, if, etc. are all great, but expecting it is a completely different story.

That and we disagree massively about them reaching big 3 levels.
 

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
I can slightly agree with these sentiments.

However, not for Sinner. Carlos has shown and has actually achieved greatness. Now, I do not see him equaling the big3, nor does he have to in order to become something insanely special.

Sinner on the other hand has done nothing other than show signs of potential. His one slam is starting to look more like a fluke. Either way, expecting him to win more than 3-5 slams is ludicrous in my eyes. He might be more in the Med, Thiem, and Delpo category. Which by the way, deserves respect as they are slam winners.

Point is, words like potential, hope, could, if, etc. are all great, but expecting it is a completely different story.

That and we disagree massively about them reaching big 3 levels.

That's like...3 different categories. You have Thiem, who beat Zverev for his title. Then you have Med, who beat Djokovic (at least a version of him), for his one title (and made it to three more finals). Then you have Delpo, who was tapped to be an amazing player but had some rotten luck. His record against the big 3 is far more impressive than the other two.

If Delpo had had Med's health or even Thiem's, we wouldn't be talking about them in the same sentence.
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
Rublev who's had a woeful year other than winning Madrid could actually take the lead on the men's tour with 2 Masters titles this year if he wins Canada lol

ATP in a freefall. I said it would happen for so long and was hounded for it and yet here we are. This tournament is just chaos.
It would be weird if Canada wasn't in chaos the week after the Olympics.
 

zagor

Bionic Poster
I don’t think they belong in the same conversation if we’re being honest. Charlie is way ahead at this point.

He's way ahead overall career-wise but as far as this season is concerned, we'll see how the rest of the year (USO especially) unfolds. Things can change very quickly in tennis, TTW generally has a short-term memory.

What if SInner say wins USO and YEC and Carlos goes out early or is out because of injury or something? Not saying it's gonna happen or that I would even bet on it happening but it's a possibility.
 

kevaninho

Hall of Fame
Not his year as such, but most players on the tour would love to have had 1 final, 2 SF, and 2 QF in their last 5 tournaments.

Pretty decent for a guy whos been having issues this year.

Plus every tournament hes played in hes reached at least the QF stage, including all slams.

Hardly a bad year, although many expected better after Australia.
 
.........Point is, words like potential, hope, could, if, etc. are all great, but expecting it is a completely different story.

That and we disagree massively about them reaching big 3 levels.
Good to exchange views. No one can know for sure, man. When a player shows a spark of magic, it's exciting. I'm keeping an eye on Joao Fonseca too. Wishing good things for them, their future.
 
Last edited:
Top