Eh?So, now that you confirmed that you haven't been saying what I pointed at all along, you can go back and re-read what I and others were talking about.
Plenty to pay attention to.
The debate is about pro stocks vs retail rackets. Are pro stocks better or special compared to retail rackets.
If weve already established that the difference between a pro stock and a retail racket is simply where its sold, then how can you continue to say pro stocks are special and better than retail rackets?
What if they were to release that pro stock for general sale in retail shops, does it cease to be special simply because youve changed not the racket composition but the sales channel?