Is Kermode a Meddler or does Tennis need to change?

Abolish lets when serving - fine
Best of four game sets at 'next gen' - awful and sinister. Preparing to introduce it everywhere???
Do away with five set matches (except at semis and finals)? Yes, some 3 set matches in early rounds (or later rounds) are boringly one sided, but on the other hand ....

Is all this really necessary? What is driving it? Television to some extent, presumably, but also this feeling that somehow tennis has to be more 'up to date' - that change for change's sake is the ideal.

Cricket has been more bullish and proud of its traditions (e.g. stuck to wooden bats - not that I'm against graphite racquets).

The tie-break was a brilliant and necessary idea, so it's not a question of being a dyed in the wool traditionalist, but too much watering down of the structure and scoring of the game will reduce it to vapid entertainment as happened in the 'quick tennis' event at the end of 2016 (can't remember what it was called).
 
I mean I don't follow TV ratings, and tournament attendance, so I don't really know. If both are declining heavily globally, then I can understand why they're going out of their way to make such drastic changes, but something tells me that isn't the case to the degree this kind of an overhaul would indicate.
 
I'd love to see stats about the length of the average match in majors in 1968 and 1917. Maybe then we'd know if tennis is really taking longer, but I suspect it is.
 
Back
Top