He's 23, he still has time. When Annacone, McEnroe and Roddick all say he's the most talented player on tour aside from Fed, that tells you something. And yes, he needs more than talent, he needs coaching, a work ethic and results on court. If someone like Stan can peak at age 29-31, there is a wan hope Nick can get his act together within the next 6 years. I still think he has a greater shot to win Wimbledon in 2019-20 than Thiem has to win RG.nick should retire
Well, tell that to these ATG's, who strongly disagree.Not really - because no one rates him that highly.
He's 23, he still has time. When Annacone, McEnroe and Roddick all say he's the most talented player on tour aside from Fed, that tells you something. And yes, he needs more than talent, he needs coaching, a work ethic and results on court. If someone like Stan can peak at age 29-31, there is a wan hope Nick can get his act together within the next 6 years. I still think he has a greater shot to win Wimbledon in 2019-20 than Thiem has to win RG.
Exactly.Who's Henri LeConte though?
Progress in tanking? That's some progress!To be fair, that was three years ago. Nick is still tanking on occasion, but not to this egregious extent. He's making progress.![]()
He's ranked 27th.
I don't think he's overrated just underperforming. He should be a mainstay in the top 10 and a GS victory is conceivable, if he ever gets his act together.
I'm just really tired of people hyping him up as some sort of giant slayer. "He always brings his A-game against the top guys." "He loves the big stage." "He thrives in this kind of environment." etc, etc.
The guy can be scary to play, but his record against the top guys is so blown out of proportion. His one win vs Fed was on clay in 2015, since then he's 0-5 if we count the Laver Cup. His two wins against Novak came during the worst stretch of his career. He's a huge server with 2 wins against Nadal on very fast courts, so not exactly shocking there. And his only win against Andy was in 2018.
People still treat him like an 18 year old with great potential. Where any good showing is hopeful that he can put it together. He won't. This is peak Kyrgios we're seeing right now, and he can't even take a set off 37 year old Fed. It's as good as things are going to get, because his career is rapidly going to spiral out of control sooner than later once these injuries become more than just nagging pains.
Who's Henri LeConte though?
25 posts in this thread and not even one has mentioned the number of injuries he has had that has derailed his career.
If he was in good physical condition, he could have been more successful
The boy just ain't right in the head.
He will retire with a career on par with another shotmaker and mental midget, Henri LeConte.
At least that guy made it to a slam final, something it's hard to imagine our lad Nicky doing.
Accomplishment wise, I would say NO. What has he won? Winning two matches against Novak an one against Roger and Rafa is almost useless if he did not win a tournament. He seems to be physically and mentally unfit to be a significant championIn terms of talent?
Yes, undoubtedly.
Nick played out of his mind in those two wins over Novak. His serve was incredible in those two matches. He has done very little since then.I hope Djokovic can reverse his H2H against Krygios before he calls it quits.
watched the Gasquet-Kyrgios match in Tokyo yesterday, and the guy is amazingly talented for sure and he is a serving machine! But, he just couldn't have cared less, he played like it was an exhibition. ...
Eh. I think we all recognized his talent right away and assumed that he would combine it with increased fitness and training. Like how Murray broke out onto the scene very quickly as a scrawny kid and bulked up and became one of the fittest players on the tour right away. Kyrgios hasnt at all done this. So I think we are seeing that talent just doesnt mean that much if you dont combine it with fitness and high level training. I dont think his level of talent is exaggerated at all. He is probably one of the most talented players to not take his career seriously at all. Even Safin, despite his stereotype, trained hard and did what was necessary to be a top player for the first several years on tour. Id keep in mind that Kyrgios hasnt played that much this year because of injuries. But id relate that to him just not being fit enough.
It's a bit up in the air whether injuries are the cause of him not playing much. Kyrgios skipped the mandatory clay masters (as well as Monte Carlo) citing injury. When the clay season was over he then said he doesn't think playing on clay is really tennis, it's more about fitness and you don't get rewarded properly for shot making. I'm not sure his extended absence had anything to do with injury.
It feels weird to see Patrick McEnroe ahead of Roger Federer, beating him by 0.01%... tennis is such a sport of small marginshttps://www.atpworldtour.com/en/stats/return-games-won/all/all/all/
Any player who does not show up in this list is highly unlikely to win more than one major, and usually not even one. He's at around 17%, and that's just not good enough. If that stat does not improve, he'll just be in the top 10 or top 20, at best, in the future.
watched the Gasquet-Kyrgios match in Tokyo yesterday, and the guy is amazingly talented for sure and he is a serving machine! But, he just couldn't have cared less, he played like it was an exhibition. He was only interested in hitting aces and winners, no rallies whatsoever. It was weird match to watch, entertaining but somehow empty, without substance. I wonder if Kyrgios is going to become a permanent exhibition man or clown of the tour, or if he will manage to put his head together and become a real pro... Kyrgios even makes Monfils look like a hardcore pro![]()
Not everyone can be Wawrinka. If people could stop bringing him up that would be great.Not necessarily. Wawrinka reached his peak when he was 29.
Wawrinka always had more game than Nick.He's 23, he still has time. When Annacone, McEnroe and Roddick all say he's the most talented player on tour aside from Fed, that tells you something. And yes, he needs more than talent, he needs coaching, a work ethic and results on court. If someone like Stan can peak at age 29-31, there is a wan hope Nick can get his act together within the next 6 years. I still think he has a greater shot to win Wimbledon in 2019-20 than Thiem has to win RG.
I hope Djokovic can reverse his H2H against Krygios before he calls it quits.
I'm just really tired of people hyping him up as some sort of giant slayer. "He always brings his A-game against the top guys." "He loves the big stage." "He thrives in this kind of environment." etc, etc.
The guy can be scary to play, but his record against the top guys is so blown out of proportion. His one win vs Fed was on clay in 2015, since then he's 0-5 if we count the Laver Cup. His two wins against Novak came during the worst stretch of his career. He's a huge server with 2 wins against Nadal on very fast courts, so not exactly shocking there. And his only win against Andy was in 2018.
People still treat him like an 18 year old with great potential. Where any good showing is hopeful that he can put it together. He won't. This is peak Kyrgios we're seeing right now, and he can't even take a set off 37 year old Fed. It's as good as things are going to get, because his career is rapidly going to spiral out of control sooner than later once these injuries become more than just nagging pains.
I used to be a big fan of Kyrgios when he started on tour. Even before all the hype, I saw him play at US Open when he was 17 and a totally new face and I was sure he was the real deal. Well after making the semis at Wimbly 3 or 4 years ago, he has done nothing at all since then. Such a great talent, but obviously no work ethics and constantly injured (likely due to poor physical conditioning). He seems to be happy to be a top 25 player. Gee, even Monfils (another clown) had enough motivation and will to reach the top 10.
It saddens me to say this but I believe Kyrgios is way overrated as a player. Sure he can blasts amazing FH and serves, but he cannot win. Federer toyed with him during the Laver Cup, it wasn't even funny. How a 37 yo player (OK, this is the GOAT but still) can make a 23 yo look slow? This is pathetic, and Kyrgios is just a curiosity on tour, an attraction due to his antics and bad attitude, not a potential great such as Zverev or Shapovalov. No wonder McEnroe selected him to play in LC, this is showtime baby, but he got trashed in no time in singles. My 2 cents.
Is Kyrgios the most overrated player in ATP?
It's his movement and footwork that is his main weakness. He has an amazing serve and good forehand but when that serve is not clicking, like it wasn't against Federer in Laver Cup or the USO, he can't really hurt great baseliners who have a good return game. Nishikori and Federer both took him apart in the last two Slams from the baseline.
His serve was working...Federer made it look like it wasn’t working.
He was also amazing in early 2017 as well. IW/Miami and beating Djokovic in Mexico as well.His peak was Wimbledon 2014.
He was also amazing in early 2017 as well. IW/Miami and beating Djokovic in Mexico as well.His peak was Wimbledon 2014.
He's 23, he still has time. When Annacone, McEnroe and Roddick all say he's the most talented player on tour aside from Fed, that tells you something. And yes, he needs more than talent, he needs coaching, a work ethic and results on court. If someone like Stan can peak at age 29-31, there is a wan hope Nick can get his act together within the next 6 years. I still think he has a greater shot to win Wimbledon in 2019-20 than Thiem has to win RG.
Don't be silly! We all know when Novak plays at least at 70% he can return anyone's serves! Nick's nothing special! His return game was just lame!Nick played out of his mind in those two wins over Novak. His serve was incredible in those two matches. He has done very little since then.
25 posts in this thread and not even one has mentioned the number of injuries he has had that has derailed his career.
If he was in good physical condition, he could have been more successful
25 posts in this thread and not even one has mentioned the number of injuries he has had that has derailed his career.
If he was in good physical condition, he could have been more successful
If he was in good physical condition, he wouldn't be injured so often.
What a pr!ck.
Not everyone can be Wawrinka. If people could stop bringing him up that would be great.