Is Martina Navratilova the overall tennis greatest ever ??

Don't get me wrong, I have no love for Court and deplore some of her public attitudes but I always separate that from her achivements as a player which can't be denied.
Agreed too, but also like it noted that of her 11 Aus Open slam victories that I think 4 of them were only 3 or 4 matches all up? And over half of them she never faced a player that wasn’t from Australia because nobody could afford the money or time to travel down here. So it really inflated her numbers.. facts need to be laid out :)
 
Martina is the most dominant female player of all time. She’s my pick for female GOAT. Her run from 1982-86 is what sealed the deal. And I won’t even include her records in doubles play. I’m talking only about singles play.

She owns 5 of the top 11 longest winning streaks.

She owns 4 of the top 6 seasons for winning pct.

Here’s a record that she has that I have never realized before:

Her are the WTA players that won an event 8+ times in the Open Era

12 Chicago titles. Martina
11 Eastbourne titles. Martina
9 Wimbledon titles. Martina
9 Dallas Titles. Martina
9 German Open titles. Steffi
8 WTA Tour Finals. Martina
8 Los Angeles titles. Martina
8 Miami titles. Serena
8 Family Circle titles. Evert.
And these 8 WTA finals were when women still played 5 best of sets in the final.
 
I think it's debatable whether Martina is the women's GOAT, let alone the overall GOAT. Personally, I think Martina, Steffi and Serena are all at the top tier (I have Steffi just about ahead but obviously very controversial) of women's tennis and Djokovic at the top tier of men's tennis.

We needn't have an overall GOAT for both men and women though if we did, it would be Djokovic
 
To win a slam title even in mixed doubles with 49 is epic. Say whatever you want about mixed doubles, but women have to deal with men's serve there and it's not easy task, since most of the double players have a very good serve.
 
I think it's debatable whether Martina is the women's GOAT, let alone the overall GOAT. Personally, I think Martina, Steffi and Serena are all at the top tier (I have Steffi just about ahead but obviously very controversial) of women's tennis and Djokovic at the top tier of men's tennis.

We needn't have an overall GOAT for both men and women though if we did, it would be Djokovic
Djokovic is the GOAT in singles. Martina would be the GOAT overall, you can't discount doubles, they are the part of the sport.
 
Djokovic is the GOAT in singles. Martina would be the GOAT overall, you can't discount doubles, they are the part of the sport.
They're not really part of the sport. They are their own category. Does anyone put McEnroe above Borg because of his doubles record? They are evaluated separately. The only way in which it should be considered is that Martina won singles slams while also playing doubles at the same tournament, which is of course hugely impressive. But the number of doubles slams alone doesn't make he the GOAT IMO
 
They're not really part of the sport. They are their own category. Does anyone put McEnroe above Borg because of his doubles record? They are evaluated separately. The only way in which it should be considered is that Martina won singles slams while also playing doubles at the same tournament, which is of course hugely impressive. But the number of doubles slams alone doesn't make he the GOAT IMO
If they are not part of the sport why do we have doubles and mixed doubles in slams and Olympics?
 
If they are not part of the sport why do we have doubles and mixed doubles in slams and Olympics?
They are of course all tennis but singles tennis is a different game from doubles. There's a reason that very few of the top singles players give any real focus to doubles tennis, and largely vice versa
 
It appears that anyone who has primarily used the numbers/stats to debate their goat point, either has to support this argument, or eat hypocrite crow. I hate doubles in all its forms, but definitely accept that it’s not only a part of the tennis universe, but it’s likely the most popular. Hence, it should have a big seat at the table. Martina/Court have to be goat from the “accountant's” perspective.
 
I think I agree with you BorgTheGoat Court seems to sometimes get underrated in the debate. Noticing this.
 
They are of course all tennis but singles tennis is a different game from doubles. There's a reason that very few of the top singles players give any real focus to doubles tennis, and largely vice versa
The separation of singles and doubles is a trend that started in the 1990s. Before Bolletieri, most top singles players had also very good results in doubles.
 
Agreed too, but also like it noted that of her 11 Aus Open slam victories that I think 4 of them were only 3 or 4 matches all up? And over half of them she never faced a player that wasn’t from Australia because nobody could afford the money or time to travel down here. So it really inflated her numbers.. facts need to be laid out :)

Court won 13 non-AO slams so she is competitive but I do agree that her AO count is inflated. (Now don’t get me started on Steffi Graf).

I would vote for Navratilova, closely followed by Evert. Serena Williams is up there but her overall body of work needed to be deeper.

Maureen Connolly and Monica Seles are the two great what ifs of women’s tennis.
 
The separation of singles and doubles is a trend that started in the 1990s. Before Bolletieri, most top singles players had also very good results in doubles.
Evert did not have anywhere near the same focus on doubles as Navratilova. Nor did Graf. But even if we grant that doubles used to be prioritised on a similar level, should Graf and Serena be penalised because the attitude had shifted by the time they played?
 
Counting majors is not really a good way to assess players, especially from the 70s. What impresses me most about Martina is her peak era as a singles player. 1982 to 1986. She barely lost sets, let alone matches. She was like peak McEnroe, but for five years running. But she peaked a bit late in her career and had flaws, particularly in terms of fitness before she found her groove.

The most accomplished singles player might actually be Evert. Forget the majors counting. Look more deeply at the numbers. Evert wasn't even playing the French and the Australian much of the time in her best years. But absolutely no one was even close to touching her on either green or red clay, and let's remember she won all three US Opens on har-tru. But the French Opens weren't well attended at the time, so you have to look at Chris's results in other venues. Between 1974 and 1981, she was definitely the best in the world. That's a highly sustained run of dominance. After that, during Martina's peak, Evert was firmly #2. I think only Graf comes close in terms of consistency.

For context, here are the W-L records:

Navratilova: https://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/wplayer.cgi?p=MartinaNavratilova
Evert: https://www.tennisabstract.com/cgi-bin/wplayer.cgi?p=ChrisEvert

Martina with probaby the best peak ever. Chris with perhaps the most sustained prime ever.
 
Watching Graf and Sabatini playing doubles was pretty funny. There effectively played as 2 (incredibly talented) singles players out on court, and didn't exactly have amazing communication. But they did strike gold at Wimbledon in 1988.

Carlos Kirmayr throught that Sabatini playing doubles alongside Graf was hindering her game, and also causing her to show too much respect to Graf when it came to their singles battles, and so instructed her to terminate that partnership.
 
Didn't read the thread, but obviously it comes down to doubles and how much that is considered, as the posted tweet suggests. If you're of the view that doubles accomplishments should play a significant role in overall GOAT, then yes, Martina could be considered the overall greatest tennis player.
 
Martina is my personal favorite women's player of all time.

However IMO overall GOAT is between the two that own the biggest historical record that this game is built on, the slams. The two at the top of the mountain are Court and Djokovic, the two most decorated champions of all time. 24 slams speaks volumes. Those two have the greatest trophy cabinets and winning is everything. Either Djokovic breaks the tie to become the overall GOAT, or a new player rises up and surpasses them both.
Graf is overall GOAT and it is undisputed. 22 Slams and a Golden Calendar Slam. Its not even close. There is a debate on the mens side, but if we add in the women to this there is no dispute. Graf has this and likely always will as well.
 
Graf is overall GOAT and it is undisputed. 22 Slams and a Golden Calendar Slam. Its not even close. There is a debate on the mens side, but if we add in the women to this there is no dispute. Graf has this and likely always will as well.
I don't see how it's undisputed when Court has 24 Majors and a calendar-year Grand Slam while Serena has 23 Majors and 2 non-calendar year Grand Slams, with both of them also having much more doubles success than Graf. And that's not even getting into 17 year-old Seles taking the WTA throne away from Graf and looking better than ever at age 19 before she was stabbed or the Navratilova stats across disciplines posted here.
 
I don't see how it's undisputed when Court has 24 Majors and a calendar-year Grand Slam while Serena has 23 Majors and 2 non-calendar year Grand Slams, with both of them also having much more doubles success than Graf. And that's not even getting into 17 year-old Seles taking the WTA throne away from Graf and looking better than ever at age 19 before she was stabbed or the Navratilova stats across disciplines posted here.
Doubles cannot be included in a GOAT discussion that is absurd. Non-calendar slams mean nothing, the Calendar Slam is the Grand Slam. Graf's was greater than Court's as on 3 surfaces.
Graf upset the applecart back in the day. The US media, all powerful back in the 80s were very smug about how US players were dominating, and Navratilova and Evert were the golden girls, then came along Graf who was greater than both and the media hated it, absolutely hated it. Even today that Graf Golden Calendar Slam never gets mentioned.
Funnily enough Agassi barely gets mentioned these days, he actually had a golden super slam which again never gets mentioned. Graf and Agassi certainly seem to have upset the Establishment, i sometimes wonder if that is partly how they ended up married as that was a sort of common ground.
 
Graf upset the applecart back in the day. The US media, all powerful back in the 80s were very smug about how US players were dominating, and Navratilova and Evert were the golden girls, then came along Graf who was greater than both and the media hated it, absolutely hated it.
Yes, Graf upset the apple cart when both Evert and Navratilova were older than Graf was when she retired.

Then, Seles started rocking the apple cart when she was 16 and Graf was 20 and then flipped the apple cart at age 17, winning three straight French Opens, three straight Australian Opens, three straight WTA Finals, and two straight U.S. Opens. At the time she was stabbed, Seles was looking stronger than ever, with no indication Graf would have taken her throne back. It was a shame for Seles and also a shame for Graf, who couldn't and didn't prove that she could ever take back her crown from Seles.
 
The doubles titles are very much part of the sport and hence somebody to say only singles should be considered for GOAT of the sport is silly

If they want to be specific like GOAT of clay , they can argue for GOAT of singles tennis or GOAT of men’s singles tennis , but when talking about GOAT of the sport I am not seeing how one can place anyone ahead of Graf or Martina

Graf because of the calendar slam that also included Olympics and Martina for the 59 majors
 
Back
Top