Djokovic vs Fraud in 2011 USO SF comes to mind, although not a final.I'd argue it needs to be an ATG vs ATG, but that one was quite impressive.
Other contender would be the 1984 French Open final. McEnore was up 2-0 in set on Lendl and either up a break in the third set or had break point(s) to go up a break.
Also the 2004 French Open final would be a contender: Coria won the first two sets, 6-0, 6-3. Then, he was up 4-4, 40-0 in the third set. Gaudio eventually took sets 3-4. Coria then had 2 match points in set 5 before Gaudio came back to win.Other contender would be the 1984 French Open final. McEnore was up 2-0 in set on Lendl and either up a break in the third set or had break point(s) to go up a break.
Also the 2004 French Open final would be a contender: Coria won the first two sets, 6-0, 6-3. Then, he was up 4-4, 40-0 in the third set. Gaudio eventually took sets 3-4. Coria then had 2 match points in set 5 before Gaudio came back to win.
It was 2 sets all though. Or are u saying for goats being 0-2 v Medvedev and his era is in real terms 2 sets all and a break up...which maybe has some traction to be honestNo.
Federer down 1-3 in the 5th set of AO17 against Rafa is far more dire/impressive
It was 2 sets all though. Or are u saying for goats being 0-2 v Medvedev and his era is in real terms 2 sets all and a break up...which maybe has some traction to be honest
Gaudio?
No argument from me that both Coria and Medvedev screwed up. Not easy to think of many such big deficits being overturned in Slam finals so I'm just throwing nominations out there...Was that really a comeback?
Meddy might be considered more of a choke too tbh
it is a 100% legit slam win. if anything, wimby 2022 is asterix, and i say it as a djokovic fan and nadal disliker. so thats why uso 2023 win was so important, because even without wim 2022 he has one more slam than nadal.No. Djokovic's comeback against Tsitsipas at the French Open in 2021 is vastly superior. Plus, he beat Nadal the previous round and did not rely on corrupt government officials banning someone from competing.
The 2022 AO is an asterisked slam and doesn't count. Djokovic was unfairly and unjustly banned simply because he refused to take a dumb placebo vaccine. Nadal would've never won the AO that year had Djokovic been allowed to play.
Funnily enough i thought Federer would win, i felt the whole match he was the better player technically but Rafa was just scrapping like a warrior but i remember thinking if Roger hits a purple patch he will turn it round and lo and behold he did.Exactly
When you're playing a GOAT you will find a reason to choke, one point can tilt the whole match let alone a decisive game.
Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
I disagree, since Federer was clearly playing better so far.No.
Federer down 1-3 in the 5th set of AO17 against Rafa is far more dire/impressive
Djokovic 4-2, 30-15 down, 5th set, to Nadal at '12 AO!No.
Federer down 1-3 in the 5th set of AO17 against Rafa is far more dire/impressive
and this wasn't even down 2-3 0-40Yes, it is.
![]()
I don't think it was. It always felt like fed was going to win that match for some reason. only down a break isn't nearly as bad as down 2 sets and 0-40.No.
Federer down 1-3 in the 5th set of AO17 against Rafa is far more dire/impressive
I never thought Med was winning that match so it cant be. Fed felt done, but he also did not wait to the last second.Exactly
When you're playing a GOAT you will find a reason to choke, one point can tilt the whole match let alone a decisive game.
Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
Djo was outplaying him and so was Fed in the 2017 AO Final, if anything I thought the comebacks were coming even if I was rooting against it.Djokovic 4-2, 30-15 down, 5th set, to Nadal at '12 AO!
Nadal was fighting for his life it was epic af lolMore impressive than this year’s AO F, Nadal actually fought back to win while AO 24, Med just folded like a cheap tent.
I wrote him off as soon as he lost the 4th set.Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
It was incredible. We do not get those matches anymore. AO17, this one, WC 19... they just did incredible things.Nadal was fighting for his life it was epic af lol
The ups and downs and agony was what made that match so incredible to me. That and the wait since his last one and injury and being against Rafa... I mean I can go on forever. I might just watch that 5th set tonight.I wrote him off as soon as he lost the 4th set.
I don't think it was. It always felt like fed was going to win that match for some reason. only down a break isn't nearly as bad as down 2 sets and 0-40.
Whole tournament was clutch from him.It was incredible. We do not get those matches anymore. AO17, this one, WC 19... they just did incredible things.
Sinner will win tomorrow, but he isn't going to do anything crazy. Neither has Carlos.
They just did epic things that was pure fireworks. Nothing feels like this cause it ain't.
I did feel bad for Rafa at the time, but he got his wins later.Whole tournament was clutch from him.
![]()
Heck, his whole first half of 2022. The Felix match at RG and against Djokovic being down a break to go 5 sets. I miss that Rafa EXCITEMENT![]()
Rafa played better in 2018, but still credit to Federer who's level was honestly high af at Wimbledon 2019. He was tearing that ball UP. I was actually thinking about that match the other day, that match point Rafa saved was insane, he had to kill himself to even stay in rallies with Fed in that match.I did feel bad for Rafa at the time, but he got his wins later.
But the Fed domination of Rafa after was much needed for us Fed fans and himself.
That Rafa/Fed 19 WC was an underated match too.
Those were the days.Rafa played better in 2018, but still credit to Federer who's level was honestly high af at Wimbledon 2019. He was tearing that ball UP. I was actually thinking about that match the other day, that match point Rafa saved was insane, he had to kill himself to even stay in rallies with Fed in that match.
What reason I wonder. Federer hadn't beaten Nadal at a slam since 2007.
Saw a clip pop up of that in my feed and I am still amazed he pulled that off. He loses 1 of the next 3 points he likely loses the match in straights. Can't think of anything more improbable than that. Would have loved to have seen the live odds down 2 sets 0-40.
I still dunno how he was capable of that. Especially after being 2 sets down. That was a crazy day.Kevin Anderson was 66/1 live to defeat Federer at this Wimbledon match - the only match he won against him in 7 attempts.
![]()
Roger Federer stunned by Kevin Anderson in five-set Wimbledon thriller
Roger Federer was knocked out of Wimbledon by Kevin Anderson after a thrilling five-set battle that ended in a 2-6, 6-7 (5), 7-5, 6-4, 13-11 victory for the South Africanwww.theguardian.com
Kevin Anderson was 66/1 live to defeat Federer at this Wimbledon match - the only match he won against him in 7 attempts.
![]()
Roger Federer stunned by Kevin Anderson in five-set Wimbledon thriller
Roger Federer was knocked out of Wimbledon by Kevin Anderson after a thrilling five-set battle that ended in a 2-6, 6-7 (5), 7-5, 6-4, 13-11 victory for the South Africanwww.theguardian.com
The AO 2022 and Wimbledon 2022, including the USO 2022, suffered insensitive political interventions. But of all of them, the most serious attack on the integrity of the open tennis competition is AO 2022, because they prevented the participation of the record holder of the tournament there. This is similar, how political constraint would make it impossible for Nadal to participate in the RG. Preventing an exceptional player from participating will affect the competition more than banning the start for average players.it is a 100% legit slam win. if anything, wimby 2022 is asterix, and i say it as a djokovic fan and nafal disliker. so thats why uso 2023 win was so important, because even without wim 2022 he has one more slam than nadal.
The night before the match, I said here:
"Remember Basel 2015"
We didn't have much evidence bc they hadn't played each other in a while, but Fed won that match, a Final, in straights. I had belief, but when it got to 1-3 in the 5th there wasn't much of it left.
It was 2 sets all though. Or are u saying for goats being 0-2 v Medvedev and his era is in real terms 2 sets all and a break up...which maybe has some traction to be honest
Gaudio vs. Coria RG final had no ATGs in there and is widely acknowledged as one of the greatest comebacks ever.I'd argue it needs to be an ATG vs ATG, but that one was quite impressive.
In 2022 it was no choke, Nadal was simply too clutch and outplayed the Russian since 0-2 and 0-40. Saying Medvedev choked the AO 2022 final is equally unobjective as saying Nadal choked the AO 2017 F. No, Rafa didn't. Rafa's legs said no, plus Roger increased uis aggressivity and precission and Nadal was outplayed. As much as it was an epic match, and a great display of mental strength plus clynic groundstokes by Roger, the AO 2017 F doesn't qualify as one of the "greatest comebacks" though, as it was merely overcoming a half a set (1-3) deficit, while in the AO 22 F, RG 2004 F and RG 1984 F, the winning player needed to overcome a 2 sets deficit.The fact that Medvedev went through that same choke up 2 sets to love in the Aus Open final 2 years later against Sinner is just insane to me.
To happen once is awful but twice in such a short space? Devastating.
If Nadal supposedly "ducked" Federer in Cincy 2015, what does it tell us of Federer at the USO 2013 losing to Robredo before facing Nadal?Wasn't in straights. Nadal was bad in 2015 (and ducked Fed in Cinci that year) but surprisingly he found some good form in indoor season of all places. It was a high quality match IMO.
The AO 2024 and AO 2022 F are not the same at all, in the AO 2024 Med was exhausted from the 3rd set after having spent 20 hours on court, the equivalent of almost 2 more matches than Sinner (15 hours) before the final. There was nothing else the Russian could've done with that fatigue. At the AO 2022, Med wasn't tired, nor did he show any sumptom of fatigue.Nadal comeback was great but in retrospect when you see the same scenario played out in Med vs Sinner, it seems less impressive to me.
Med just can't keep up the aggressive play for the BO5 match without running out of steam at some point. And he can't beat the very best with his usual defensive game, he has to go for it.
Even in 2021 USO, if Novak somehow won that 3d set he would have won the match IMO. Med admitted in the presser after the match that he was getting tired.