Is Rafas 2022 AO down 2 sets, 2-3 and 0-40 the greatest comeback in slam final history?

Yes, it is.

840_560.jpeg
 
Other contender would be the 1984 French Open final. McEnore was up 2-0 in set on Lendl and either up a break in the third set or had break point(s) to go up a break.

Yes, this is the one I thought of first.

McEnroe at his absolute peak, against a guy who lost four slam finals in a row, comes back from 0-2 to beat McEnroe who had not lost a single match that year up to that point.
 
Other contender would be the 1984 French Open final. McEnore was up 2-0 in set on Lendl and either up a break in the third set or had break point(s) to go up a break.
Also the 2004 French Open final would be a contender: Coria won the first two sets, 6-0, 6-3. Then, he was up 4-4, 40-0 in the third set. Gaudio eventually took sets 3-4. Coria then had 2 match points in set 5 before Gaudio came back to win.
 
Also the 2004 French Open final would be a contender: Coria won the first two sets, 6-0, 6-3. Then, he was up 4-4, 40-0 in the third set. Gaudio eventually took sets 3-4. Coria then had 2 match points in set 5 before Gaudio came back to win.

Coria had no business losing that match. SMH.
 
It was 2 sets all though. Or are u saying for goats being 0-2 v Medvedev and his era is in real terms 2 sets all and a break up...which maybe has some traction to be honest

Exactly

When you're playing a GOAT you will find a reason to choke, one point can tilt the whole match let alone a decisive game.

Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
 
The 1st one that comes to mind for me is Agassi in the 1999 RG final coming back from 2 sets to love down and break points at 4 all in the 3rd, when he hadn't won a Slam in 4 years and had never won RG which would complete his career Slam.
 
No. Djokovic's comeback against Tsitsipas at the French Open in 2021 is vastly superior. Plus, he beat Nadal the previous round and did not rely on corrupt government officials banning someone from competing.

The 2022 AO is an asterisked slam and doesn't count. Djokovic was unfairly and unjustly banned simply because he refused to take a dumb placebo vaccine. Nadal would've never won the AO that year had Djokovic been allowed to play.
 
Was that really a comeback?

Meddy might be considered more of a choke too tbh
No argument from me that both Coria and Medvedev screwed up. Not easy to think of many such big deficits being overturned in Slam finals so I'm just throwing nominations out there...
 
No. Djokovic's comeback against Tsitsipas at the French Open in 2021 is vastly superior. Plus, he beat Nadal the previous round and did not rely on corrupt government officials banning someone from competing.

The 2022 AO is an asterisked slam and doesn't count. Djokovic was unfairly and unjustly banned simply because he refused to take a dumb placebo vaccine. Nadal would've never won the AO that year had Djokovic been allowed to play.
it is a 100% legit slam win. if anything, wimby 2022 is asterix, and i say it as a djokovic fan and nadal disliker. so thats why uso 2023 win was so important, because even without wim 2022 he has one more slam than nadal.
 
Last edited:
Exactly

When you're playing a GOAT you will find a reason to choke, one point can tilt the whole match let alone a decisive game.

Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
Funnily enough i thought Federer would win, i felt the whole match he was the better player technically but Rafa was just scrapping like a warrior but i remember thinking if Roger hits a purple patch he will turn it round and lo and behold he did.
 
No vote for Wimbledon 2019? The false goat / imposter best grass player ever can’t close out a match with 2 match points on his serve to secure his legacy, becoming only the 2nd male player in the Open Era to choke away championship points in a slam final.
 
No.

Federer down 1-3 in the 5th set of AO17 against Rafa is far more dire/impressive
I don't think it was. It always felt like fed was going to win that match for some reason. only down a break isn't nearly as bad as down 2 sets and 0-40.
 
Exactly

When you're playing a GOAT you will find a reason to choke, one point can tilt the whole match let alone a decisive game.

Being 1-3 to Rafa in the 5th of a Slam Final is curtains for anyone, and I'm sure everyone watching was like "ok well that's the end of that"
I never thought Med was winning that match so it cant be. Fed felt done, but he also did not wait to the last second.

AO 17 was a dream come true. I did not sleep for like 24 hours.
 
I don't think it was. It always felt like fed was going to win that match for some reason. only down a break isn't nearly as bad as down 2 sets and 0-40.

What reason I wonder. Federer hadn't beaten Nadal at a slam since 2007.
 
It was incredible. We do not get those matches anymore. AO17, this one, WC 19... they just did incredible things.

Sinner will win tomorrow, but he isn't going to do anything crazy. Neither has Carlos.

They just did epic things that was pure fireworks. Nothing feels like this cause it ain't.
Whole tournament was clutch from him.

giphy-downsized-large.gif


Heck, his whole first half of 2022. The Felix match at RG and against Djokovic being down a break to go 5 sets. I miss that Rafa EXCITEMENT :D
 
Whole tournament was clutch from him.

giphy-downsized-large.gif


Heck, his whole first half of 2022. The Felix match at RG and against Djokovic being down a break to go 5 sets. I miss that Rafa EXCITEMENT :D
I did feel bad for Rafa at the time, but he got his wins later.

But the Fed domination of Rafa after was much needed for us Fed fans and himself.

That Rafa/Fed 19 WC was an underated match too.
 
I did feel bad for Rafa at the time, but he got his wins later.

But the Fed domination of Rafa after was much needed for us Fed fans and himself.

That Rafa/Fed 19 WC was an underated match too.
Rafa played better in 2018, but still credit to Federer who's level was honestly high af at Wimbledon 2019. He was tearing that ball UP. I was actually thinking about that match the other day, that match point Rafa saved was insane, he had to kill himself to even stay in rallies with Fed in that match.
 
Rafa played better in 2018, but still credit to Federer who's level was honestly high af at Wimbledon 2019. He was tearing that ball UP. I was actually thinking about that match the other day, that match point Rafa saved was insane, he had to kill himself to even stay in rallies with Fed in that match.
Those were the days.

Stop talking about it, you are making me hate tennis again. A bunch of next gen mugs.
 
What reason I wonder. Federer hadn't beaten Nadal at a slam since 2007.

The night before the match, I said here:

"Remember Basel 2015"

We didn't have much evidence bc they hadn't played each other in a while, but Fed won that match, a Final, in straights. I had belief, but when it got to 1-3 in the 5th there wasn't much of it left.
 
Saw a clip pop up of that in my feed and I am still amazed he pulled that off. He loses 1 of the next 3 points he likely loses the match in straights. Can't think of anything more improbable than that. Would have loved to have seen the live odds down 2 sets 0-40.

Kevin Anderson was 66/1 live to defeat Federer at this Wimbledon match - the only match he won against him in 7 attempts.

 
Kevin Anderson was 66/1 live to defeat Federer at this Wimbledon match - the only match he won against him in 7 attempts.

I still dunno how he was capable of that. Especially after being 2 sets down. That was a crazy day.
 
Kevin Anderson was 66/1 live to defeat Federer at this Wimbledon match - the only match he won against him in 7 attempts.


Outside of the Finals heartbreaks like 40-15 and Wimbledon 2008, I think this match hurts the most....maybe more than US14 SF
 
it is a 100% legit slam win. if anything, wimby 2022 is asterix, and i say it as a djokovic fan and nafal disliker. so thats why uso 2023 win was so important, because even without wim 2022 he has one more slam than nadal.
The AO 2022 and Wimbledon 2022, including the USO 2022, suffered insensitive political interventions. But of all of them, the most serious attack on the integrity of the open tennis competition is AO 2022, because they prevented the participation of the record holder of the tournament there. This is similar, how political constraint would make it impossible for Nadal to participate in the RG. Preventing an exceptional player from participating will affect the competition more than banning the start for average players.
 
If Djokovic won the RG in such a way that Nadal was prevented from playing the RG due to political pressure, I would not be thrilled with such a win. But a significant portion of Nadal fans, it seems, are hypocrites.
 
This was an incredible comeback. No doubt about it.

Rates quite high because of multiple reasons -

1. Playing one of the best of his generation in hard courts who also beat Djokovic in last USO.
2. Second AO was kind of important for Nadal
3. He was completely down and out with a 4% chance.


I will be honest. It might have been the greatest Houdini act in tennis.
 
The night before the match, I said here:

"Remember Basel 2015"

We didn't have much evidence bc they hadn't played each other in a while, but Fed won that match, a Final, in straights. I had belief, but when it got to 1-3 in the 5th there wasn't much of it left.

Wasn't in straights. Nadal was bad in 2015 (and ducked Fed in Cinci that year) but surprisingly he found some good form in indoor season of all places. It was a high quality match IMO.
 
It was 2 sets all though. Or are u saying for goats being 0-2 v Medvedev and his era is in real terms 2 sets all and a break up...which maybe has some traction to be honest

Nadal comeback was great but in retrospect when you see the same scenario played out in Med vs Sinner, it seems less impressive to me.

Med just can't keep up the aggressive play for the BO5 match without running out of steam at some point. And he can't beat the very best with his usual defensive game, he has to go for it.

Even in 2021 USO, if Novak somehow won that 3d set he would have won the match IMO. Med admitted in the presser after the match that he was getting tired.
 
I'd argue it needs to be an ATG vs ATG, but that one was quite impressive.
Gaudio vs. Coria RG final had no ATGs in there and is widely acknowledged as one of the greatest comebacks ever.
The fact that Medvedev went through that same choke up 2 sets to love in the Aus Open final 2 years later against Sinner is just insane to me.

To happen once is awful but twice in such a short space? Devastating.
In 2022 it was no choke, Nadal was simply too clutch and outplayed the Russian since 0-2 and 0-40. Saying Medvedev choked the AO 2022 final is equally unobjective as saying Nadal choked the AO 2017 F. No, Rafa didn't. Rafa's legs said no, plus Roger increased uis aggressivity and precission and Nadal was outplayed. As much as it was an epic match, and a great display of mental strength plus clynic groundstokes by Roger, the AO 2017 F doesn't qualify as one of the "greatest comebacks" though, as it was merely overcoming a half a set (1-3) deficit, while in the AO 22 F, RG 2004 F and RG 1984 F, the winning player needed to overcome a 2 sets deficit.

The AO 2024 F was also not a choke at all. Medvedev had spent more than 20 hours, the equavalent of almost two more matches than Sinner (15 hours) before advancing to the final. Medvedev legs didn't respond from the 3rd set, it was clear as the sun. There was nothing else he could've done.
 
Last edited:
Wasn't in straights. Nadal was bad in 2015 (and ducked Fed in Cinci that year) but surprisingly he found some good form in indoor season of all places. It was a high quality match IMO.
If Nadal supposedly "ducked" Federer in Cincy 2015, what does it tell us of Federer at the USO 2013 losing to Robredo before facing Nadal?
Nadal comeback was great but in retrospect when you see the same scenario played out in Med vs Sinner, it seems less impressive to me.

Med just can't keep up the aggressive play for the BO5 match without running out of steam at some point. And he can't beat the very best with his usual defensive game, he has to go for it.

Even in 2021 USO, if Novak somehow won that 3d set he would have won the match IMO. Med admitted in the presser after the match that he was getting tired.
The AO 2024 and AO 2022 F are not the same at all, in the AO 2024 Med was exhausted from the 3rd set after having spent 20 hours on court, the equivalent of almost 2 more matches than Sinner (15 hours) before the final. There was nothing else the Russian could've done with that fatigue. At the AO 2022, Med wasn't tired, nor did he show any sumptom of fatigue.

Crazy how you called me a Federer hater but here you're dismissing Nadal and his rivals 24/7. Now supposedly the AO 2022 F is not that impressive, Med is a weak rival and Sampras with only 14 Slams and 0 French Open is greater than Nadal with 22 Slams and a Double Career Grand Slam, right? Who's the hater now?
 
Back
Top