Imagine you are a child interested in playing tennis. Imagine your parents are struggling to make ends meet
Want to learn how to play? There’s the self taught route, but clearly the majority of promising players take lessons from a young age. Coaching rates when I was a kid ranged from 60-80 for an hour, but I knew someone who charged upwards of 200 for the hour.
Now you don’t need private lessons every day, but I knew some young kids/teenagers who would get lessons 3-4 times per week. And the rest of the days are filled by playing in clinics, which also cost money, or by playing with friends (free). Still, the cost adds up
You want to play in tournaments? Guess what? They cost money. Want to play in higher level tournaments? Guess what? You have to travel, which costs money
Want to play year round? Have to pay for court time in the winter.
Racquets and balls are “cheap?” In the long run, I guess that’s the case. But strings are not. A talented kid playing 4-5x a week will probably break them on a weekly basis, if not more frequently. The stringers around here charge around 30 dollars for a strong job depending on the string choice
Shoes wear out and need to be replaced. Very expensive
Tennis is absolutely easier to get ahead in if you come from a wealthy background. It is absolutely a sport of privilege. Of course, there are exceptions, and there is a tennis center in the city (I presume the same model exists elsewhere) which subsidizes rates and offers cheap programs for inner city children. But how can you legitimately think the sport is equally accessible to anyone regardless of their SES? Serious inquiry