Tennis2349
Professional
A few questions:
Many of us just watched college football. Miami vs Indiana. Indiana has the oldest team in history. Average age 24. And Miami has a quarterback stating he graduated two years ago when asked about his classes.
It seems college tennis is similar. I randomly looked at Ohio state and the 6th singles is 24. Over a 13 UTR, but at 16 he was a 9. Which isn’t that great.
Are we entering a new era in which traditional 17-18 year old dont have a chance at making D1 teams unless they are basically top ten to 25 in the country ? I don’t understand these age rules.
Secondly , I have noticed the American juniors with the highest utr’s often times have extremely low USTA rankings. 1200, 500, 600, 433. Etc. their results in USTA level 1’s are not great either. Round of 64, maybe round of 32 etc. and obviously foreign kids aren’t playing USTA. Should Americans just opt out?
Which tells me they are playing itf’s, prize money events, men’s events etc. not sure if they are truly “better” or just the utr is higher.
And I have never heard of any coach saying “we are looking for a 5 star”. Or “we are seeking a top 100 national player”. It strictly comes down to a utr number.
Having said that, is the whole chasing points and USTA events a waste of time and money? You might make it into level 1’s , play 3-4 a year and just have bad draws. That won’t help your utr at all. Might be better to play events like battle of Boca on weekends where you consistently play 11’s and 12’s.
In closing a local player I know (17) has been solely playing USTA events. Stuck at an 11 utr and zero d1 interest. Plays a battle of Boca and destroys and 11.5 and beats a 12.6. Seems if he did this a lot sooner he would have a higher utr. Also, these kids in USTA tournaments with the same utr seem to be much tougher.
Am I right in assuming utr (no matter how you get there) is the main factor? The USTA just seems to be a much tougher route for Americans who don’t know any better until it’s too late. They will take the foreign 12 every day of the week over a local 11.
Also, kids are training and prepping for a level 1 for a long time. Seems to be a much tougher tournament than playing events like battle of Boca that are every weekend.
Is much of this process choosing the right path and events? It seems you can be the same player, with the same skill, but have a very different utr just based on where you play.
Many of us just watched college football. Miami vs Indiana. Indiana has the oldest team in history. Average age 24. And Miami has a quarterback stating he graduated two years ago when asked about his classes.
It seems college tennis is similar. I randomly looked at Ohio state and the 6th singles is 24. Over a 13 UTR, but at 16 he was a 9. Which isn’t that great.
Are we entering a new era in which traditional 17-18 year old dont have a chance at making D1 teams unless they are basically top ten to 25 in the country ? I don’t understand these age rules.
Secondly , I have noticed the American juniors with the highest utr’s often times have extremely low USTA rankings. 1200, 500, 600, 433. Etc. their results in USTA level 1’s are not great either. Round of 64, maybe round of 32 etc. and obviously foreign kids aren’t playing USTA. Should Americans just opt out?
Which tells me they are playing itf’s, prize money events, men’s events etc. not sure if they are truly “better” or just the utr is higher.
And I have never heard of any coach saying “we are looking for a 5 star”. Or “we are seeking a top 100 national player”. It strictly comes down to a utr number.
Having said that, is the whole chasing points and USTA events a waste of time and money? You might make it into level 1’s , play 3-4 a year and just have bad draws. That won’t help your utr at all. Might be better to play events like battle of Boca on weekends where you consistently play 11’s and 12’s.
In closing a local player I know (17) has been solely playing USTA events. Stuck at an 11 utr and zero d1 interest. Plays a battle of Boca and destroys and 11.5 and beats a 12.6. Seems if he did this a lot sooner he would have a higher utr. Also, these kids in USTA tournaments with the same utr seem to be much tougher.
Am I right in assuming utr (no matter how you get there) is the main factor? The USTA just seems to be a much tougher route for Americans who don’t know any better until it’s too late. They will take the foreign 12 every day of the week over a local 11.
Also, kids are training and prepping for a level 1 for a long time. Seems to be a much tougher tournament than playing events like battle of Boca that are every weekend.
Is much of this process choosing the right path and events? It seems you can be the same player, with the same skill, but have a very different utr just based on where you play.
Last edited: