Is this NTRP 4.0 Men Singles

What is this guy's rating ?


  • Total voters
    33

jctpm

New User

Do you think the player (white cap and shorts) level is accurate for NTRP 4.0 Men Singles ? What part of his game is or is not ?
 

utsd21

Rookie

Do you think the player (white cap and shorts) level is accurate for NTRP 4.0 Men Singles ? What part of his game is or is not ?

How do you think Medvedev would be rated here on a video like this? especially based on his pretty FH?

There are some pro players that can hardly hit a BH, well, compared to their pro fellows. So, you could ridiculize their BH based on what you see.
Yet, I think they'd destroy 99% of players on this board with their BH alone, even if they were forced to hit run around BH :)

For the ranking, it doesn't matter how nice or ugly a technical element is, it only matters what results you can achieve and at what level you are competitive.
 

samarai

Semi-Pro
theres a guy on our courts, who when practicing and rallying looks like he can play college tennis at a top school. However when he plays matches, especially doubles ( breaks down even further when there is a wager on the match), his nice looking strokes falls apart fast.
 

eah123

Hall of Fame
Sure, this guy does not have textbook strokes, is slow on his feet, and uses a waiter tray serve. But he hits and serves with much more consistency than a 3.0 or 3.5, and with enough pace to apply pressure. Easily 4.0 in my area.
 

Purestriker

Legend

Do you think the player (white cap and shorts) level is accurate for NTRP 4.0 Men Singles ? What part of his game is or is not ?
Low end 4.0, but more like a 3.5 pusher. That back hand is rough. More importantly, the guy on the other court in the green shirt is struggling.
 

denoted

Semi-Pro
The only way to tell is to see what the computer says. I have "updated my priors" about what people look like on video enough times to question the universal tendency to underrate.
 

Purestriker

Legend
The only way to tell is to see what the computer says. I have "updated my priors" about what people look like on video enough times to question the universal tendency to underrate.
Correct. Great form does not always equal a higher rating. I have seen players with amazing groundstrokes that can't construct points or close matches.
 
Another thing that I've noticed is that match-up can screw with our perception of USTA ratings. I've seen decent 3.5s give solid 4.0 players trouble just because they had a playstyle the other person struggled with.

Given this players generally lethargic energy, I'd say anyone that could move him around the court would be successful. It did not seem like his opponent was doing this enough.
 

WildVolley

Legend
In the past, I played league a number of years on a 4.0 team that went to sectionals multiple times. I see nothing about this to suggest this isn't a 4.0 league or tournament set.
 

FiddlerDog

Hall of Fame
theres a guy on our courts, who when practicing and rallying looks like he can play college tennis at a top school. However when he plays matches, especially doubles ( breaks down even further when there is a wager on the match), his nice looking strokes falls apart fast.

This is the classic 3.5, in my area.
Hits 150mph forehands, every time.
Can't keep 2 balls in a row, in play.
 

FiddlerDog

Hall of Fame
Black shirt is a classic 3.5 when he crushes his approach shot into the back curtain.
3.5 players hit as hard as they can on every ball.

That crazy slice BH pass shows years of hackery paying off.
Well done. Great hands. That is textbook 4.0 backhand junker.

Use of defensive slice at :58 is 4.0 level.
A 3.5 would try to crush a winner from his back heels.

Movement and footwork is 3.5

1:06
Serve return is blocked back like a 4.0
A 3.5 would try to crush serve returns down the line for winner, every time.

Also, no split step for serve return is ATP level.

1:51 Nice racket speed on 2nd serve. That is a toss up.
3.5 crushes 2nd serves for DF, and many 4.0 dink serve the 2nd serve.

1:56, you hit wide, and do not move forward. Classic 3.0 and 3.5
4.0 would most forward when hitting into the corner.

Your net clearance at last rally is 4.0
Your recovery to center is also 4.0

In all, I love your game, and would love hitting with a guy like you.
Thanks for posting and join a local league this year!!
 

vex

Legend
A weak 4.0 with the ugliest BH I’ve ever seen. But he has directional control, an ugly but effective first serve and decent movement. Could be a low 4.0
 

jctpm

New User
Thanks for the comments and feedback. This video is from a tennis buddy of mine. I consider him to be a 3.5 here in NYC. Just wanted to know what others in the tennis community think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vex

EggSalad

Hall of Fame
Thanks for the comments and feedback. This video is from a tennis buddy of mine. I consider him to be a 3.5 here in NYC. Just wanted to know what others in the tennis community think.

3.5 was my thought but he has better consistency than some of the 3.5s I’ve seen which made me think low level pusher 4.0.

He probably beats most 3.5s with consistency and loses to 4.0s because his movement is really poor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vex

vex

Legend
3.5 was my thought but he has better consistency than some of the 3.5s I’ve seen which made me think low level pusher 4.0.

He probably beats most 3.5s with consistency and loses to 4.0s because his movement is really poor.
This
 

WildVolley

Legend
Thanks for the comments and feedback. This video is from a tennis buddy of mine. I consider him to be a 3.5 here in NYC. Just wanted to know what others in the tennis community think.

Does he play USTA and have a computer rating?
 

Chas Tennis

G.O.A.T.
Waiter's Tray serve. Forehand, not much uppermost body turn, uses shoulder joint too much. I don't evaluate two hand backhands.

Some of my 4.0 players were strong at singles. Some had form that looked very good by my eye then, but I was not evaluating or videoing them when I last played.

Here I just look at some technique issues. I don't know the % of Waiter's Tray serves at 4.0.

3.5
 

Curtennis

Hall of Fame
I'm in Philly and I think either guy would have a tough run for their money at 3.5. Green shirt is serving so weak, that I think most 4.0s would simply run him around to death on his own serve. Different regions have different skill levels for USTA for sure. Where is this one located?

Volley at 2:08 is very telling. That should have been an immediate put away, or at least anything other than what it was. This is fun recreational tennis for sure, but I think 4.0s around here aren't letting balls like that get away.
 

jctpm

New User
I'm in Philly and I think either guy would have a tough run for their money at 3.5. Green shirt is serving so weak, that I think most 4.0s would simply run him around to death on his own serve. Different regions have different skill levels for USTA for sure. Where is this one located?

Volley at 2:08 is very telling. That should have been an immediate put away, or at least anything other than what it was. This is fun recreational tennis for sure, but I think 4.0s around here aren't letting balls like that get away.
This is located in NYC. I feel he would have a tough time in 3.5 USTA. There are alot of people sandbagging and playing down in league play.
 

Shroud

Talk Tennis Guru
He has been struggling with TE for a long time. Already playing with Clash and X1 Biphase. What else can he do ?
Megamind is on the right track I would also add stretching religious stretching and then get a baseball and rub the crap out of the forearm massage it like crazy do that all the time.

Also keep it warm particularly at night you want to keep the blood flowing. Get like a neoprene sleeve not one that’s going to restrict blood flow but one that you can rap. They make products called Thigh wraps. They are neoprene and you can adjust the tension Wrap his arm up at night and sleep it will keep it warm.

Also there are sleeves like Raonic would wear, or NBA players.

Best thing would be to run around every backhand ever
 

jz000

Semi-Pro
3.75

Serve 3.5
FH 3.95
BH ??
Footwork 2.5
Consistency 4.0

But whatever, just have fun and don't stop playing.
 

ChaelAZ

G.O.A.T.

Do you think the player (white cap and shorts) level is accurate for NTRP 4.0 Men Singles ? What part of his game is or is not ?


Accurate would be what rating he earned. Simple as that. You can put whatever rating you want based on looks, but until he is playing and beating rated 4.0 players, it is just speculation. Flex will not get him a rating either, and player's self-ratings there are kinda subject. If he does play a USTA rated 4.0 and wins, that is at least a good point for discussion.

Keep swinging and post up some official matches to see how it goes.
 

2nd-srv-ace

New User
Computer rating is based on match results, not on your your technique/style of play. This also depends on your area's pool of players, if you happen to beat most of the players in your area, then you will be higher rated.
 

utsd21

Rookie
Just watch this video.

Del Po, Fed and Rafa have some really good forehands, that bring them plenty of points

go check how many winners he scored in the AO final vs Rafa from FH and how many from BH
go check where Rafa was targeting his drop shots, to the BH or to the FH
this list could go infinite

it's easy to explain why the player #2 has good FH, but that was not the point of my message
my point was, take Meddy in a crowded indoor hall, post the video here, and see how he will be rated by TT experts ;)
 

TennisDawg

Hall of Fame
How do you think Medvedev would be rated here on a video like this? especially based on his pretty FH?

There are some pro players that can hardly hit a BH, well, compared to their pro fellows. So, you could ridiculize their BH based on what you see.
Yet, I think they'd destroy 99% of players on this board with their BH alone, even if they were forced to hit run around BH :)

For the ranking, it doesn't matter how nice or ugly a technical element is, it only matters what results you can achieve and at what level you are competitive.
Medvedev is in this conversation? Please
 

TennisDawg

Hall of Fame

Do you think the player (white cap and shorts) level is accurate for NTRP 4.0 Men Singles ? What part of his game is or is not ?
Depends on his computer ranking. Does he win a good amount of 4.0 matches? It’s not pretty tennis but if you were playing him you still have to execute your shots right? He probably doesn’t beat himself. Yeah he may well be a 4.0.
 

user92626

G.O.A.T.
And it doesn’t matter that it’s not Federish. He can blow players off the court with it.
I start to think the fh technique is alot more forgiving or fundamentally loose as demonstrated by the pro's than this TT board gives it! In other words the TT hacks are making life more difficult than it really is!!!!!!!

If you pay closer attention you'll notice there's alot of variety of pro's FHs. There's NO TWO same height, same shape take back, same C, U, V-shape swing but they hit just fine.

After a certain point, I think the pros start to focus on footwork, set-ups, mental concentration and especially stamina. Look at Nadal vs Medv.

Both could crank out shots after shots virtually on equal footing but Nadal, having much a longer experience with the slams, eventually was able to accumulate enough difference to prevail. In other words, Nadal concentrated better on key points and had better stamina.
 
Top