Is Yonex supplying like 75% of the WTA now?

Moveforwardalways

Hall of Fame
It really seems like you can’t watch a WTA match and not see Yonex everywhere. Still some Wilson, Babolat, and Head, but Yonex is by far the most common. Really amazing the surge they have had lately. Is this top notch marketing and endorsements or do that many WTA players really prefer their racquets?
 
Probably a combination of frame design (as per modern game) and marketing budget. Most of their lineup on the Ezone and VCORE side sits right inbetween control oriented and tweener rackets. I’ve been a Tfight and Prestige user for the last 13 years and recently switched to the Ezone 98. I needed the extra power with whatever impact feel I could still hold on to and found the Yonex to be a great fit.
 
Lot of yellow banana PA on both sides on world team tennis..

Hope yonex doesn't go yellow...but if they do...I am sure they will make it sparkle..
 
I just switched to Yonex after using Babolat for the last 6 or 7 years. Seems the rackets are more comfortable for an older guy like me and seems to give me a little more pop also.
 
You could get a gold one like Naomi

I might actually pull the trigger and get a couple of those. Even if it's just a collector item.

I'm not really all that suprised, Yonex makes amazing frames. Quality control is stellar too. So glad I made the switch from Wilson months ago. I can't see myself playing with any other racquet.
 
Watched Battle of the Brits Team tennis last week, mostly Blades for women except Dart (Yonex), Konta (Pure Aero), and Watson (Dunlop).
 
You see more younger/junior players playing Yonex, too. They're probably going after them when they're young, and it doesn't hurt to have Osaka and Kerber winning majors and Nick K. drawing people into the brand. When someone is hitting 140 mph serves people will naturally what to know what he's playing.
 
When someone is hitting 140 mph serves people will naturally what to know what he's playing.

That's what attracted people to Babolat--seeing Roddick pound those serves.
 
It really seems like you can’t watch a WTA match and not see Yonex everywhere. Still some Wilson, Babolat, and Head, but Yonex is by far the most common. Really amazing the surge they have had lately. Is this top notch marketing and endorsements or do that many WTA players really prefer their racquets?
Maybe because we do not see the top players lately...
#1 = Head
#2 = W
#3 = Bab
#4 = Bab
#5 = W
#6 = Head
#7 = W
#8 = Yonex
#9 = W
#10 = Yonex
 
As the top players are paid to play with their equipment, I always tought it was more interesting to see the stuff college/under 800 atp use, because they actually pay a part of their stuff. It tells much more about the quality.
Example : here in France, around the equivalent of 6.0, you see TONS of Asics shoes, and Yonex racquet. Asics shoes because they are the most resistant, Yonex racquet because they have the best QC and therefore are easy to match specs by yourself.
 
It is a combination of the fact the equipment is good.. But also the Yonex tour team are doing a great job of looking after the pro players and they treat people the same whether they are ranked 200 or 1 (less money endorsements obviously)
 
It really seems like you can’t watch a WTA match and not see Yonex everywhere. Still some Wilson, Babolat, and Head, but Yonex is by far the most common. Really amazing the surge they have had lately. Is this top notch marketing and endorsements or do that many WTA players really prefer their racquets?

they pay the best of all the racquet companies and sign lots of players
 
When I was growing up in my mid-teens around 2008 (in the UK), there were a few things I recall people negatively perceiving Yonex for:

- they were mainly used by WTA pros
- the headshape being isometric (rectangular) put people off

Now back then there was Hewitt and Nalbandian playing with Yonex, but there were tonnes of WTA pros. I think maybe 5-7 years ago Yonex really took off on the ATP side too so it's very even, or at least not so lopsided to the women's tour.

My first Yonex racket was the black and red RQiS 1 Tour. I then had the blue and lime one, but I sold them both and now wish I'd never. It was a case of wanting the latest racket and I sold them to fund the new one but for me the black and red one will always be my favourite, and Ivanovic was my favourite player (I seem to love huge forehands - del Potro is another of my faves).

Now that I'm not always after the latest and greatest, I really wish I had an RQiS 1 Tour and an N Blade 98 - what a pairing.

I love Yonex rackets to be honest, I've had a few EZone 98s and they're just brilliant in my opinion. I'm also rather into their paint jobs too.
 
Green/ Black Wilsons are also on the TV Everytime i watch..... daily..
Got a problem? Wilson I’d say is number 2 in sales for WTA, by a pretty close margin. Very few clashes, I’m surprised it’s only blade pj’s and maybe an ultra here or there.
 
no problems..just stating the facts that wilson is one of the top rackets on both tours....even D1 for the most part..
 
Yes in the past Yonex was all about Nalbandian, Hewitt, Hingis, Dementieva and barely anyone else used it.

But then they started the push and nowadays significantly more players use Yonex. Not to mention that Wawrinka and Kerber won 3 Slams both, Osaka won 2 - esp. that Yonex is popular in Asia. You have still Kyrgios, Bencic, Vekic, Tiafoe, Vekic, Vondrousova, Sevastova out there. Yonex is much more visible thanks to all of them.

Other thing is in the past Yonex didn't have stable lines like it is now. Each iteration and line was different and it was hard to follow any particular racquet. You had for example RDS 003 which was 27.25" 20-24mm and its successor was RDiS 300 27" 22-24mm. RDS 002 and RDiS 200 were different also. RQiS 1 disappeared. VCORE 95D also for some time. So it was hard to predict if any racquet will come back or not or will be different.
 
Quality racquets. I used Pro Staffs for years before making the switch to DR98, can't see me ever going back, or to something else. Definitely not Babosplat. They can eff off.
 
Yonex needs a sustainable grand slam champion on either tour....
They have tasted success ..but not drunk like Wilson, Babolat and Head..
 
Yonex needs a sustainable grand slam champion on either tour....
They have tasted success ..but not drunk like Wilson, Babolat and Head..

Probably not going to happen on the men's side for a while. Best they got is Shapo, Tiafo, and Hurkacz (Stan doesn't count because he's in the twilight of his career).

Osaka will probably stick around and win a gaggle of slams on the women's side.
 
On the womens side Yonex is okay but on the mens they won’ t have a GS champ in a while also I don’t see who could even make a SF ...
They invested in Kyrgios, Tiafoe, Chung and Shapo and none of them lives up to hype.
 
As the top players are paid to play with their equipment, I always tought it was more interesting to see the stuff college/under 800 atp use, because they actually pay a part of their stuff. It tells much more about the quality.
Example : here in France, around the equivalent of 6.0, you see TONS of Asics shoes, and Yonex racquet. Asics shoes because they are the most resistant, Yonex racquet because they have the best QC and therefore are easy to match specs by yourself.
Agree 100%. In the states I'm seeing tons of the top male juniors and low level ATP pros (1000-100) using yonex as well. Certainly seems to be taking the player's racket crown over the old Head classic days now that Head has gone a weirdly different direction.
 
Agree 100%. In the states I'm seeing tons of the top male juniors and low level ATP pros (1000-100) using yonex as well. Certainly seems to be taking the player's racket crown over the old Head classic days now that Head has gone a weirdly different direction.
I don't agree. Head had some hard time, but the todays and future times seem to be bright with Andreescu, Barty, Gauff, Mertens, Zverev still they have Djokovic. Head attracted really good talent out there. Transition from junior to senior is not so obvious that we can say it will translate into future marketing. I guess Yonex just became more popular with recent success but I don't really know who will represent them let's say in 3 years time. I can mention only Osaka is real chance for any Slam win and for ATP there is zero chance for now.
 
I don't agree. Head had some hard time, but the todays and future times seem to be bright with Andreescu, Barty, Gauff, Mertens, Zverev still they have Djokovic. Head attracted really good talent out there. Transition from junior to senior is not so obvious that we can say it will translate into future marketing. I guess Yonex just became more popular with recent success but I don't really know who will represent them let's say in 3 years time. I can mention only Osaka is real chance for any Slam win and for ATP there is zero chance for now.
You are only looking at the top who get paid big money to "endorse" the racket. Not the up and coming next gen. I'm talking about the players who pay or get discounts on rackets that they actually use, not the ones who get paid big $$$ to market their brand. IE its a question of what are these next gen using and choose to use, and not of which brand is paying top dollar for a top player to market their goods, while under the fancy paint job branding is a completely different racket....
 
You are only looking at the top who get paid big money to "endorse" the racket. Not the up and coming next gen.
Because theses are the people who will be marketing these companies in 3-5 years. Andreescu, Zverev and Barty are almost bound to be in TOP10-TOP20 in 3 years unless some bad injury happens to them. All of them should be TOP5. Gauff is 16, Sinner 18, these are players who are potentially TOP10-TOP20 in 5 years. All 5 players mentioned have a real chance of winning a GS in some upcoming time (some bigger some slimmer but I talk about potential). Meaning majority of people watching tennis will see Head racquets all the time used by very top players. While Yonex will be visible only with Osaka basing on current situation.
And these top USA juniors you are talking about have less than 5% chance to be in ATP TOP20 ever. Not to mention that last American to do anything significant was Roddick. So potentially basing this on probability none of them is going to market Yonex in few years time.
 
Because theses are the people who will be marketing these companies in 3-5 years. Andreescu, Zverev and Barty are almost bound to be in TOP10-TOP20 in 3 years unless some bad injury happens to them. All of them should be TOP5. Gauff is 16, Sinner 18, these are players who are potentially TOP10-TOP20 in 5 years. All 5 players mentioned have a real chance of winning a GS in some upcoming time (some bigger some slimmer but I talk about potential). Meaning majority of people watching tennis will see Head racquets all the time used by very top players. While Yonex will be visible only with Osaka basing on current situation.
And these top USA juniors you are talking about have less than 5% chance to be in ATP TOP20 ever. Not to mention that last American to do anything significant was Roddick. So potentially basing this on probability none of them is going to market Yonex in few years time.
Ok so your point is who has the biggest bank roll to pay players. In that case sure Head is right up there. Crap rackets but high $$$
 
Ok so your point is who has the biggest bank roll to pay players. In that case sure Head is right up there. Crap rackets but high $$$
Im trying to tell you which company will have better visibility in ATP and WTA in few years time based on current situation (because of course some unpredictable things happen too). None of these Head players was drawn to Head for big money when they succeeded. They are Head players from juniors meaning probably Head doesn’t pay them this much. I would even say it is possible Osaka and Kurgios paycheck from Yonex could be comparable to what these 5 players receive from Head all together ;)
 
Im trying to tell you which company will have better visibility in ATP and WTA in few years time based on current situation (because of course some unpredictable things happen too). None of these Head players was drawn to Head for big money when they succeeded. They are Head players from juniors meaning probably Head doesn’t pay them this much. I would even say it is possible Osaka and Kurgios paycheck from Yonex could be comparable to what these 5 players receive from Head all together ;)

" They are Head players from juniors"
So you now think what rackets they play with as a junior NOW translates into pro.... Hmmm. Ok I'm done with this useless banter.
 
" They are Head players from juniors"
So you now think what rackets they play with as a junior NOW translates into pro.... Hmmm. Ok I'm done with this useless banter.
Im talking about players who have already succeeded, shown their potential on GS level and are known for the worldwide audience. But this had already happened. How are you able to tell if a junior succeedes in senior tennis?
You can sponsor only 1 junior who then wins 20GS and gives you crazy profits and you can also sponsor 90% of juniors and none of them will reach GS SF ever meaning money wasted. So basically what Im directly referring to is you said that bacause of many juniors in US use Yonex in the future Yonex will be more popular than Head which is not true. There is such chance of course but we cannot be sure.
So yes, Head did a good job of finding great juniors to sponsor but by the time they chose them they couldnt be sure they will translate into success.
 
They should have let everyone use that ltd edition VCORE 98/100 paint job and not just Japanese players that lose in the first round
 
If Yonex brings out a series 3 Vcore SV95 with 16 x 19 and 320gsm unstrung weight
many single BH players with western FHs would be in heaven.
 
If Yonex brings out a series 3 Vcore SV95 with 16 x 19 and 320gsm unstrung weight
many single BH players with western FHs would be in heaven.
Actually I think more TT would be in heaven which is 0.05% of the market ;) For <4.5 NTRP level player using such racket doesn’t make sense.
 
We dont use NTRP here in Japan but 3 of my students use the vcore 98 one sv95 they all have single bhs and have won many singles titles for under 16 and 18.
Looking at their abilities vs ntrp 4.5 they are well above that considering these 3 including myself have points in the Japanese
My older charge is 20 and uses the sv95 with great success until he couldnt afford to string every set thanks to current demolition of the economy.
I also use a weighed up version but like them if the strings are not changed every few sets the margins for error increase exponentially.
The 95 has incredible pop from everywhere which explains average speeds are higher than the 98 versions but the 98 have more spin thanks to 16x19.
Most japanese children I teach have single BHs as many convert from "soft tennis" to hard or to us normal tennis.
Constantly improving Shapovalov uses the sv95 for a good reason and as he gets better mentally this model will be sought after more in the 16x19 as
the 16 x 20 requires fresh spin strings every set for competition use.
 
Back
Top