How even the Fed haters hold Fed up to such high standards. It seems like if Fed doesn't win every single tourny he enters, it's a crisis. For the love of God, people, HE STILL MADE IT TO THE BLOODY FINAL!!! Where he indeed did lose, but lost to the almost unarguable #1 clay courter in the world, but not without giving him a run. If Fed makes it to the final of a clay tourny and loses to Nadal, Fed automatically sucks, all the slams he won count for nothing, and Nadal is the undisputed greatest of this generation. If Nadal were to make it to even the SEMIS of Wimby I'm sure people would be stating "Oh WOW!, he's playing soooooooooo good" and if he lost they would say something along the lines of "Oh, well, he plays best on clay anyway". I'm not bashing on Nadal, it's just that if Nadal is truly as great or so much greater than Fed as some of the cynical posters on this board say, why don't we hold him to the same standard?