travlerajm
Talk Tennis Guru
I would have thought this would be too heavy for me too, until last last week.I don't even need to know the racket and mods because I already know it's way too heavy for me.
I would have thought this would be too heavy for me too, until last last week.I don't even need to know the racket and mods because I already know it's way too heavy for me.
I know Shroud is interested.I would have thought this would be too heavy for me too, until last last week.
That is pretty!!!!
The gorilla rings break up the boundary layer to muffle the sound. So it is more stealth.That is pretty!!!!
Looks like some sort of PWS in the sides.
Wondering how aerodynamic it is with those layered tapes on the sides. Can you describe the sound it makes when you swing? Is it like swoosh?
Most people are not knowledgeable about boundary layer in fluid mechanics.The gorilla rings break up the boundary layer to muffle the sound. So it is more stealth.
It is in the usual SW2 range.So what was the MgR/I and Recoil Weight of this magic racquet?
MgR/I is a weird metric, makes no sense. There's no intuition behind it, not sure where it originated.
tt.tennis-warehouse.com
I find it makes alot of sense in that you tune the racquet for contact. Is the racquet lagging or speeding up or neither at contact? Thats what it speaks too. That said i dont buy that there is some magic number since everyones arms are differentMgR/I is a weird metric, makes no sense. There's no intuition behind it, not sure where it originated.
I created the thread you linkedMore physics-based discussion on MgR/I
I'm creating this thread after deep-diving into MgR/I. I found it particularly intriguing since the spec has been heavily discussed on this forum, with some using it as a focal point for racquet customization, but I found it initially difficult to decipher what exactly this spec conveys in terms...tt.tennis-warehouse.com
Just make sure it is 21 for your setup
Then why don't you linearly combine them like a*MgR + b*I, with a+b = 1 and suggest the best values for a (b = 1 - a).I created the thread you linked
TDLR after thoroughly breaking down the formula, my conclusion with regard to angular acceleration is that MgR matters and moment of inertia (I) matters. But they should be treated as separate factors. I fail to see the logic in combining them as a ratio.
Nope, units are different. One is for torque, the other for moment of inertia. Makes no sense to combine.Then why don't you linearly combine them like a*MgR + b*I, with a+b = 1 and suggest the best values for a (b = 1 - a).
The road is longI would have thought this would be too heavy for me too, until last last week.
I was thinking about that. If the units are different, is it OK to take the ratio and how can it come out to be a number like 21 without units?Nope, units are different. One is for torque, the other for moment of inertia. Makes no sense to combine.
ExactlyI was thinking about that. If the units are different, is it OK to take the ratio and how can it come out to be a number like 21 without units?
I don’t believe that. When you search MgR/I on Google, the top result is almost always from this site called impacting tennis. That site is intellectual BS, sorry. Lots of conjectures, nothing to back it up.Notice how @travlerajm is silent, not wanting to give away valuable proprietary information.
I really hope someone watched you do this lol elaborate troll job, must have taken you at least an hour
I recorded some video. Will post to YouTube like usual.I really hope someone watched you do this lol elaborate troll job, must have taken you at least an hour
I recorded some video. Will post to YouTube like usual.
800g is not heavy for @Shroudthe funny thing about the op is the heavy variable is totally arbitrary. 325g isn’t heavy for me, 350g isn’t heavy for fed, 375g isn’t heavy for del po, 400g isn’t heavy for Sampras ….
Hmm. It sounds like a challenge. Half way there. Though its unlikely I could realistically add 400g MORE to a racquet. Thats like 800” of lead.800g is not heavy for @Shroud
People tend to overestimate the importance of stroke technique and underestimate the advantage of playing with a sledge hammer.Hmm. It sounds like a challenge. Half way there. Though its unlikely I could realistically add 400g MORE to a racquet. Thats like 800” of lead.
4 strips of lead like I add now is pushing it. Trav wraps between the grommets so he can add enough weight. Lead stays on for me mostly but he says no. Probably the paint. Some sticks don’t do well with lead.
Ok. Thinking about it, i would warm up with a 2 lb hammer when I played leagues. I would shadow swing all the shots except for bh overhead. Anyhow in that light yeah I could do it so could you. Especially if using the kinetic chain.
Ime the issue with such weight is deceleration on the serve.
lol, why so much hate...?i want this the Magic Ugly Racket! it is so ugly it must be good or why sane person use it?!
i have the ugly angry lady at tennis who beat me lots, but when i beat her with ugly racket she will be upset and i will be happy.
where i buy this?
ChatGPT says your knowledge of fluid dynamics is lacking:The gorilla rings break up the boundary layer to muffle the sound. So it is more stealth.
Yes, laminar flow is generally quieter than turbulent flow. This is because laminar flow involves smooth, orderly layers of fluid moving in parallel, resulting in less friction and fewer chaotic interactions. In contrast, turbulent flow is characterized by irregular, swirling patterns, which increase energy dissipation and noise generation due to higher friction and disturbances in the flow. This is why, for example, airplane wings or piping systems designed for quiet operation often aim to maintain laminar flow.
Never trust the chatbot without testing empirically.ChatGPT says your knowledge of fluid dynamics is lacking:
Did you do you do you Re calc to verify that?Turbulent air flow vs laminar air flow is going to be based on how fast the tip if the frame is moving and its duration. Air may or may not be moving turbulently as the swing occurs, but it probably does not matter. The duration of the swing is too short and there’s too much mass in the magic racquet. It matters to an airplane cuz lift is provided by differential air pressure due to air flowing faster over the top of the wing surface.
I play with a constant 20 mm beam frame which optimizes my aerodynamics.Too many assumptions. My guess is turbulent, but you don't feel any air resistance cuz the swing duration is over in less than 0.2 seconds.![]()
I would suggest using CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) to verify that @jayveeTurbulent air flow vs laminar air flow is going to be based on how fast the tip if the frame is moving and its duration. Air may or may not be moving turbulently as the swing occurs, but it probably does not matter. The duration of the swing is too short and there’s too much mass in the magic racquet. It matters to an airplane cuz lift is provided by differential air pressure due to air flowing faster over the top of the wing surface.
If I was an airport security officer, I would be scared to see this in the luggage and detain @travlerajm for questioning.I really hope someone watched you do this lol elaborate troll job, must have taken you at least an hour
I have my reasons for being a little more Sneaky these days. (got back on the winning track in Tokyo and Beijing today).No specs? @travlerajm
I have my reasons for being a little more Sneaky these days. (got back on the winning track in Tokyo and Beijing today).
I filmed some vid of me hitting with this monstrosity today. Will post it soon. It seems like it naturally helps my forehand feel more grooved, like it’s on training wheels.
400SW? That is it? Have fun with the “its too much” policeI have my reasons for being a little more Sneaky these days. (got back on the winning track in Tokyo and Beijing today).
I filmed some vid of me hitting with this monstrosity today. Will post it soon. It seems like it naturally helps my forehand feel more grooved, like it’s on training wheels.
You can tell in video that I can hardly lift it.400SW? That is it? Have fun with the “its too much” police
Sure trav. Maybe you bought stock in gorilla tape?You can tell in video that I can hardly lift it.
Sure trav. Maybe you bought stock in gorilla tape?
tt.tennis-warehouse.com
The astute observer will note that it’s actually the same racquet that I used in my most recent MEP battle (the one where I’m wearing dual knee braces, dual ankle braces, back brace, and backward cap, and ran out steam in at the 75 minute mark, and went down in flames in the super). But the racquet was missing the extra layers of gorilla. Might have made a difference.I think it did smooth out your FH from what I recall in your MEP battle videos.
Many post 65 have 75% dink and mooning games, take that away.... pickleball time.There should be no dinking and mooning post 50.
omg. What does that wristband placement do to your MgR/I numbers??I have my reasons for being a little more Sneaky these days. (got back on the winning track in Tokyo and Beijing today).
I filmed some vid of me hitting with this monstrosity today. Will post it soon. It seems like it naturally helps my forehand feel more grooved, like it’s on training wheels.