colleges.wearecollegetennis.com
The site you linked is the place to go. Click on a team name, then you can see WTN rankings for each player on the roster. E.g.:is there a free public site...where the regular fan can find WTN rankings for individual players? Michigan seems over ranked at 14. South Carolina seems too high at #5
ITA / Rankings
thanks much.....Texas avg. WTN will improve greatly when the younger Bailly gets added to the roster
WTN may be misleading and somewhat discriminatory. If one doesn't get to play against higher WTN players, he won't improve his WTN ranking much. I've begun paying attention to WTN in junior ITF but rankings based on ITF points are way more essential for players' success. The out of 40 scale is a bit dubious given that one should be in the location where higher WTN players are, although I am feeling that some EU players' sky high WTNs are for justified reasons.is there a free public site...where the regular fan can find WTN rankings for individual players? Michigan seems over ranked at 14. South Carolina seems too high at #5
ITA / Rankings
noticed that as well, I have been checking team pages, no good way right now until ITA gets the Spring 2024 season running on their results
very good question.....
is there a timeline for when the ITA Results site will be working for 2024 Results?
The iOnCourt app is possibly the best platform to access In Progress, Upcoming, and Completed college tennis outcomes. https://ioncourt.com/home The app is free to use.
Should be working now at https://colleges.wearecollegetennis.com/Results/Completed?
Great!! Thank you to the staff working out the bugs and working!!
Hard to believe GA and UNC are barely in top 40 behind Vandy and Indiana. Know it’s a rebuilding year but still…Congrats to your local-ish team Memphis at #20. Do you think they can hold on to it? Do they have the schedule to possibly push for top 16? Know they were close a few years back.
Do you think Stanford looks low?
I also looked at the CTR site with projected rankings for all D1 teams. Worst P5s: Wisconsin UR 0-8, Utah 2-7 #182 Worst start for decent MM is unranked Tulane 0-5 who was a #2 seed at Jan kickoff-was #44 last year, lost a couple 3-4 including Miami. 29 d1 teams have no win yet vs another d1 but Wisc is the only P5.
Stanford does seem low. They blanked Memphis 4-0 at kickoff and two of their three losses were to Texas and TCU. One could argue they lost to a bad Michigan team but that was without Basavareddy. I think they should get back into the top 25 but then stagnate as they play no strong opponents other than Arizona. And it’s not a guarantee they win against USC, ASU or UCLA.
Big drop off for Utah this year as they had their best season ever last year making the sweet 16. They’ve already lost to Idaho State this year.
Also Michigan State at #21. Being ranked at all is massively higher than usual for the Spartans - like decades of "usual." A huge deal.
21 seems about right. They've had a lot of good wins, but none over a really top-shelf opponent. They've beaten the current 27, 28, 51, 69, and 70. It's really refreshing to see a new Big 10 school emerge. I know the tangible reasons why they're better, but it's still shocking to me to see them rise this far.
Vanderbilt is a joke at 28....
This is the nature of computer rankings, where it is computed based on all of your wins and losses with no bias for latest results.
Texas had a disappointing Nat Indoors (by its standards) but has otherwise been right there among the top 5. Their losses have been to UVA, Arizona (at Indoors) and TCU (away). Frankly, I see them winning every match remaining on their schedule but for the home date with TCU which could be a toss up (TCU won 4-3 at home). TCU is 2, UVA 3, and Arizona 5 in the latest rankings. I would take Texas over Arizona any day outdoors. It'll probably turn out alright but it would be a shame if they don't get to host the super regionals and have to travel instead.
But the rankings could, if they wanted, reflect match scores and most recent results. Anything can be plugged into the ranking algorithm.
Ha, I don’t think he has done a good job, still would like to see him replaced
I kinda agree. If you look at the current team rankings, where teams ended up in the NCAA tourney and line up the WTN's it's gotten better since the beginning of the season. There's some anomalies. Believe it or not coming from me, I thought Stanford's WTN was more accurate than most, but their ranking was low in comparison, but their ranking started to catch up later in the season.
Lol. You can be an honorary Card supporter for that one day every year.
Haha. I wasn't very clear. I meant to say, "interested to see how all the final rankings line up compared to their corresponding WTN's". But I will cheer for the Card on the last ranking day, just this once. LOL
