RSJfan
Legend
To me they’re both de facto 250s. I think Egg feels the same way at this point in time.Indian Wells and Rome for me are de fact slams, ive felt that for years.
To me they’re both de facto 250s. I think Egg feels the same way at this point in time.Indian Wells and Rome for me are de fact slams, ive felt that for years.
Tennis should return to three slams and one fake slam, as it was during the Golden Era: W, USO and FO. Egg can pad his stats with AOs.Nobody needs a 5th Slam. Unless they want to disrupt all tennis stats to date. We were happy with 4 for more than 100 years. Why change?
at least.If a second clay slam is added we would have to add at least ten slams more to Nadals tally in all fairness
The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Has met with the Pope.If a second clay slam is added we would have to add at least ten slams more to Nadals tally in all fairness
The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Where is it written that Roland Garros must be held every year?
Nobody would complain if Paris was occasionally shifted to Rome.
Hopefully the tennis-playing Pope Leo pulls some strings to make it all happen and break up this monopoly.
The Four Slams are a triumph of Anglo-Atlanticist sporting supremacy with a nod to the Continent called the FO.
The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Has met with the Pope.
Where is it written that the clay slam must be held in Paris every year? Share it with Rome.
Hopefully the tennis-playing Pope Leo pulls some strings to make it all happen and breaks up these monopolistic practices.
Where does the AO fit into this Anglo-Atlanticist affair?
No, that should be Russia, they dope better.
Think u r mixing up Paris indoors and Miami maybe?To me they’re both de facto 250s. I think Egg feels the same way at this point in time.
Oh, that’s perfect. 12 months in one year / 4 slams = 1 slam every 3 months.Players need about 3 months to adequately prepare for a slam.
There is simply no room on the calendar for a fifth slam.
If a fifth is added it will likely come at the cost of reduced participation and huge losses to one of the existing slams.
in fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grassNobody needs a 5th Slam. Unless they want to disrupt all tennis stats to date. We were happy with 4 for more than 100 years. Why change?
Getting rid of WC will never happen lolin fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grass
No, I’m afraid we still need four. Asking for three is like being an extremist of the opposite sign.in fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grass
What is WC, a toilet?Getting rid of WC will never happen lol
Wimbledon comes one month exactly after Roland-Garros.
The number is not far from the ones that won AO and RG the same year.And that is why you can count the number of men to have won the Channel Slam in the modern era with one hand.
![]()
Agree. It’s also not environmentally friendly. We should replant forests.Grass is an outdated surface and should be done away with.
And that is why you can count the number of men to have won the Channel Slam in the modern era with one hand.
Grass is an outdated surface and should be done away with.
How about making Wimbledon a grass Masters 1000 and Indian Wells the fourth Slam? Maybe they can move Miami before IW to give players some prep.We need a grass masters 1000 before we talk about a 5th slam imo.
in fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grass
image photo upload freeThink u r mixing up Paris indoors and Miami maybe?
Are you proposing three slams: Wimbledon: Grass, Paris: Clay and NYC: Hard court. Sounds attractive.
Players are whining that the season is much too long so the obvious solution is to put Melbourne on the chopping block.
All the players hate traveling down to Australia.
![]()
Are you proposing three slams: Wimbledon: Grass, Paris: Clay and NYC: Hard court. Sounds attractive.
Players are whining that the season is much too long so the obvious solution is to put Melbourne on the chopping block.
All the players hate traveling down to Australia. Which is why players skipped it for nearly 100 years and Margaret's Slams are marginalized.
![]()
Am I the only one that uses that for Wimbledon Championship.What is WC, a toilet?
Maybe the only I am aware of.Am I the only one that uses that for Wimbledon Championship.
Oh, that’s perfect. 12 months in one year / 4 slams = 1 slam every 3 months.
But real life proves this is wrong:…
This cant be true. Someone here has to use that too. AO/FO and WC eh?Maybe the only I am aware of.
Is that Sinner’s granny?
Sorry for being a disruptive individual at the same time.Thank you for both doing the math and demonstrating that the world can not be reduced to complex mathematical calculations like 12 divided by 4.
italy got some main position in ATP and tennis establishment. since that has many players from italy commit in top. italy got some really big events as DC final, hopman cup final, WTF and of course their biggest star was catch for doping but got some holiday as "punishment". and now they want to have 5th slam. i had very hard to believe that no other country could not get better offer to any of those big events! and some people think that PTPA did their lawsuit for nothing.
Article in Italian
I've used google translate:
According to rumors published today in La Stampa, Fitp has formalized an offer to the organizers of the Madrid Masters 1000 to acquire the tournament week. There would be 550 million dollars on the table .
The possible acquisition would thus allow the Internazionali d'Italia to have the much-dreamed-of expansion to two full weeks, which until now has only been granted to Slam tournaments in the calendar. For the tournament to become a "fifth Slam" in all respects, the approval of the Grand Slam Committee - formed by the current 4 Majors - would then be needed, a more complicated matter however.
The Federation's expansion project would also include the construction of a new stadium , most likely where the Grand Stand Arena now stands, to accommodate the large crowd of fans that flock to the tournament every year. In 2024, the event recorded 358,000 spectators, with an overflowing facility, at times in serious difficulty in accommodating them.
A feasible path? The cards are on the table. All that remains is to wait for Madrid's response.
I am starting to feel uneasy.Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.
Is that Sinner’s granny?
Sorry for being a disruptive individual at the same time.
Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.
ok, why dont do it transparent. we have DC final, hopman cup final, WTF, 5th slam AND china, katar, saudi, emirates and so on had offered this but italy offered this and it is clearly better offer?!! why it was not like that? BUT all we got to know is that italy got all those big events and nothing more? was it a transparent tender? if not, as it was not, so it is very conspicuous that all that got italy now that italians have most power in the ATP! plus all what happened with sinner!Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.
Weather's going to be a factor. Won't work.It's too close to Roland Garos, maybe move it to March if you make it a Grand Slam?
Yes, Chinese athletes never doped.Italy? Srsly the land of dopers lol
If a new it should be held in china
Indian Wells and Madrid aren't one week.Rome should be a 1 week tournament like all the other M1000s.