Italian Open organizer eyes tournament as 5th tennis Grand Slam

Nobody needs a 5th Slam. Unless they want to disrupt all tennis stats to date. We were happy with 4 for more than 100 years. Why change?
Tennis should return to three slams and one fake slam, as it was during the Golden Era: W, USO and FO. Egg can pad his stats with AOs. :rolleyes:
 
If a second clay slam is added we would have to add at least ten slams more to Nadals tally in all fairness
The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Has met with the Pope.
Where is it written that the clay slam must be held in Paris every year? Share it with Rome.
Hopefully the tennis-playing Pope Leo pulls some strings to make it all happen and breaks up these monopolistic practices.

 
Last edited:
Paris would lose several hundred million a year, so I guess they might complain.

The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Where is it written that Roland Garros must be held every year?
Nobody would complain if Paris was occasionally shifted to Rome.
Hopefully the tennis-playing Pope Leo pulls some strings to make it all happen and break up this monopoly.

 
The Italian promoter Binaghi is suggesting sharing of the slams. Has met with the Pope.
Where is it written that the clay slam must be held in Paris every year? Share it with Rome.
Hopefully the tennis-playing Pope Leo pulls some strings to make it all happen and breaks up these monopolistic practices.


What should he do, threaten to place Paris under an interdict (old fashioned expression for forbidding church services) unless Paris agrees to share with Rome?
 
If there is a 5th grand slam, I hope it is in the southern hemisphere may be during Feb/Mar when it is summer there. May be in South America? But unlikely that will happen because the financial math may not workout.
 
A tennis slam is a form of intellectual property so the body that runs the slams could sell-off KFC-style franchises, but that would destroy the exclusivity.

There will be no slams ever unless the ATP decides to invent a "me-too" series of slams, but they show no interest in doing so.
 
Players need about 3 months to adequately prepare for a slam.
There is simply no room on the calendar for a fifth slam.
If a fifth is added it will likely come at the cost of reduced participation and huge losses to one of the existing slams.
 
Players need about 3 months to adequately prepare for a slam.
There is simply no room on the calendar for a fifth slam.
If a fifth is added it will likely come at the cost of reduced participation and huge losses to one of the existing slams.
Oh, that’s perfect. 12 months in one year / 4 slams = 1 slam every 3 months.

But real life proves this is wrong: So bad they would never be prepared for Wimbledon, if they play Roland Garros.
The Channelslammers must be geniuses.
Wimbledon comes one month exactly after Roland-Garros. And many players have been playing those two in the same year for decades. This means they can perfectly play a slam every month.
Therefore, my proposal is that they play 12 slams per year. Imagine, in not a long time, GOAT candidates should have like say 70 or 80 slams. So exciting.

Well, after this deep elaboration, now are we all in agreement that 4 slams is fine, and nobody should even dare to question this again?

Thank you.
 
in fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grass
No, I’m afraid we still need four. Asking for three is like being an extremist of the opposite sign.
BTW, do you have an agenda of keeping the Big Three records intact forever?
 
Don't need a 5th slam, probably need less Masters. The tennis season is just too packed, it's like one masters right after the other especially from Indian Wells to Rome then one week then Roland Garros. It has to be taxing on these guys.

It's weird. There's a big break between the Australian Open and Indian Wells then again between the French Open and Wimbledon then again between Wimbledon and The Canadian Masters yet it's tightly clustered between Indian Wells and The French Open. There has to be a better way to spread out these big tournaments. Take out a clay masters and add a grass masters.
 
Last edited:
in fact, i would like to have three only (different surfaces) and have masters on grass

Are you proposing three slams: Wimbledon: Grass, Paris: Clay and NYC: Hard court. Sounds attractive.
Players are whining that the season is much too long so the obvious solution is to put Melbourne on the chopping block.
All the players hate traveling down to Australia. Which is why players skipped it for nearly 100 years and why Margaret's Slam counts are marginalized and ridiculed.
:unsure:

image photo upload free
 
Last edited:
Are you proposing three slams: Wimbledon: Grass, Paris: Clay and NYC: Hard court. Sounds attractive.
Players are whining that the season is much too long so the obvious solution is to put Melbourne on the chopping block.
All the players hate traveling down to Australia.
:unsure:

AO has always been the red-headed stepchild slam. And your fav Egg has used it to inflate his stats. Your suggestion to terminate it is an excellent one.
 
The AO is a player favourite and it starts the season off with a bang, so I'd advise you not to go into business. You lack acumen.

Are you proposing three slams: Wimbledon: Grass, Paris: Clay and NYC: Hard court. Sounds attractive.
Players are whining that the season is much too long so the obvious solution is to put Melbourne on the chopping block.
All the players hate traveling down to Australia. Which is why players skipped it for nearly 100 years and Margaret's Slams are marginalized.
:unsure:
 
Oh, that’s perfect. 12 months in one year / 4 slams = 1 slam every 3 months.

But real life proves this is wrong:…

Thank you for both doing the math and demonstrating that the world can not be reduced to complex mathematical calculations like 12 divided by 4.
 
italy got some main position in ATP and tennis establishment. since that has many players from italy commit in top. italy got some really big events as DC final, hopman cup final, WTF and of course their biggest star was catch for doping but got some holiday as "punishment". and now they want to have 5th slam. i had very hard to believe that no other country could not get better offer to any of those big events! and some people think that PTPA did their lawsuit for nothing.

Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.

Article in Italian

I've used google translate:

According to rumors published today in La Stampa, Fitp has formalized an offer to the organizers of the Madrid Masters 1000 to acquire the tournament week. There would be 550 million dollars on the table .

The possible acquisition would thus allow the Internazionali d'Italia to have the much-dreamed-of expansion to two full weeks, which until now has only been granted to Slam tournaments in the calendar. For the tournament to become a "fifth Slam" in all respects, the approval of the Grand Slam Committee - formed by the current 4 Majors - would then be needed, a more complicated matter however.

The Federation's expansion project would also include the construction of a new stadium , most likely where the Grand Stand Arena now stands, to accommodate the large crowd of fans that flock to the tournament every year. In 2024, the event recorded 358,000 spectators, with an overflowing facility, at times in serious difficulty in accommodating them.

A feasible path? The cards are on the table. All that remains is to wait for Madrid's response.
 
Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.

giphy.gif
 
Italy is the world's tennis powerhouse featuring Sinner and Jasmine Paolini. Rome deserves to host a slam.
Italia will make an offer that nobody can refuse.
ok, why dont do it transparent. we have DC final, hopman cup final, WTF, 5th slam AND china, katar, saudi, emirates and so on had offered this but italy offered this and it is clearly better offer?!! why it was not like that? BUT all we got to know is that italy got all those big events and nothing more? was it a transparent tender? if not, as it was not, so it is very conspicuous that all that got italy now that italians have most power in the ATP! plus all what happened with sinner!
 
Back
Top